Skip to main content

Terrors of the Deep


On Wikipedia’s page for Underwater, the interesting fact is noted that this is the last film released under Twentieth Century Fox, prior to its name change a couple days ago to Twentieth Century Studios (making it much harder for film writers to use shorthand for the studio now that ‘Fox’ no longer exists). It’s fitting though, given how much this movie has in common with another famous …er… ‘Twentieth Century’ title, Alien.
Director William Eubank doesn’t do much to hide that fact, or if he does he’s not very good at it. From the small team isolated in a dark abyss being picked off one by one to the mysterious nature of their inhuman adversary, kept in shadows, to even the contradictory natures of the two women in the group, one primarily headstrong, resourceful, and commanding, and the other anxious and seemingly timid, there’s not much plausible deniability for where this movie is deriving most of its influence, both narratively and aesthetically. There’s even an infant creature with a design so akin to the chestburster of the horror classic, one could make a decent argument for outright plagiarism.
But as much as the film is on a structural level simply “Alien: Under the Sea”, it works to distinguish itself in a handful of areas, making much more use for instance of its environment. The film is rather tritely set underneath the Bermuda Triangle, but in the way it characterizes the depths of that ocean, it may owe more to Gravity, given its frequent emphasis that in addition to these monsters terrorizing its characters, the bottom of the ocean is a harsh, harsh place to be marooned. The pitch darkness, intense atmospheric pressure, and tectonic shifts are as formidable an obstacle for the surviving crew of this breached drill as the hostile humanoid creatures they also have to contend with. And Eubank does a great job maintaining the claustrophobia of such a situation in addition to the harrowing atmosphere –this movie could easily have been just as serviceable a disaster flick without the fantastical elements.
But that would likely not allow for the cautionary tale the script by Brian Duffield and Adam Cozad strives to get across –the implication being extremely Lovecraftian in that these monsters were awoken from the bowels of the earth by this drill digging too deep, with even heftier gravity by the climax. An underpinning theme of the film is the lack of oversight, and evidence of secretive conspiracies of the company running this operation (another thing it shares with Alien). But the movie doesn’t say anything new in this regard, or even has the time –the most damning commentary concerning corporate greed only coming in the end credits, as though the writers are convinced there’s consequences worth exploring in a separate movie that will almost certainly never happen (and that they had to know).
As to the monsters themselves, they haven’t any real menace until late in the film. Where Alien withheld the reveal of its creature due to the intricacies and complete uniqueness of H.R. Giger’s nightmarish design, Underwater seems to do so out of pure obligation –because that’s what these kind of horror movies are supposed to do. In appearance, these humanoids have an imposing scale, but aren’t much scarier than the average Doctor Who monster, with features that might vaguely resemble Lovecrafts’ Cthulu, but only one originally horrifying kill. They’re made a more interesting and greater threat in the last act, but aren’t very memorable otherwise.
Yet, Eubank keeps the momentum up and the visuals interesting through a few invigorating stylistic touches. Right from the start, the movie throws your expectations by opening with a voiceover monologue about the psychological toll of living in a deep sea environment, which it returns to a couple times at momentous points, establishing a centred point of view and focus on character it never quite lives up to. But then in a few key action scenes, Eubank employs visceral slow-motion edits immediately preceding or at the peak of their impact, so as to give these scenes of chaos a moment of clarity. They’re incongruous in light of the careful suspense and gritty terror all around them, but their anomalous and heightened nature makes them that much more fascinating until their purpose comes together at the end.
The focal point of each of these sequences and the rock that keeps you engaged throughout is Kristen Stewart. She has a backstory that you care nothing about and exists mainly to inform her actions late in the film, but her presence and performance is so committed, arduous, and enigmatic that it draws you in effortlessly and makes you care about her in a way the script alone could never replicate. She carries the movie in spite of its’ other heavyweight Vincent Cassel, her dedication to him and his researching investing you in his character more than Cassel’s own performance does. Of the rest of the cast, which includes John Gallagher Jr., Mamoudou Athie, and a predictably insufferable T.J. Miller, Jessica Henwick is the only other one to really stand out, playing a larger role ultimately than otherwise expected. It factors into the ending which in full knowledge of this films’ Alien cliches, is rather subversive and a little bit bold, and certainly the right choice, one that does actually manage to stick with you after the film has ended.
For its’ derivative material and lesser aspects, there’s craft to Underwater. It might be one of the better examples in recent memory of a director making the most of an otherwise insubstantial script. It’s not great, but it is thrilling enough, visually compelling, and rooted in a strong lead performance to make for some solid entertainment while waiting for the last of the 2019 holdovers to make their wide debuts.

Support me on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/JordanBosch
Follow me on Twitter: https://twitter.com/Jordan_D_Bosch
Letterboxd: https://letterboxd.com/jbosch/ 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Disney's Mulan, Cultural Appropriation, and Exploitation

I’m late on this one I know. I wasn’t willing to spend thirty bucks back in September for a movie experience I knew was going to be far poorer than if I had paid half that at a theatre. So I waited for it to hit streaming for free to give it a shot. In the meantime I heard that it wasn’t very good, but I remained determined not to skip it entirely, partly out of sympathy for director Niki Caro and partly out of morbid curiosity. Disney’s live-action Mulan  I was actually mildly looking forward to early in the year in spite of my well-documented distaste for this series of creative dead zones by the most powerful media conglomerate on earth. Mulan  was never one of Disney’s classics, a movie extremely of its time in its “girl power” gender politics and with a decidedly American take on ancient Chinese mythology. It got by on a couple good songs and a strong lead, but it was a movie that could be improved upon, and this new version looked like it had the potential to do that, emphasizing

The Hays Code was Bad, Sex in Movies is Good

Don't Look Now (1973) Will Hays, Who Knows About Sex In 1930, former Republican politician and chair of the Motion Picture Association of America Will Hayes introduced a series of self-censorship guidelines for the movie industry in response to a mixture of celebrity scandals and lobbying from the Catholic Church against various ‘immoralities’ creating a perception of Hollywood as corrupt and indecent. The Hays Code, or the Motion Picture Production Code, was formally adopted in 1930, though not stringently enforced until 1934 under the auspices of Joseph Breen. It laid out a careful list of what was and wasn’t acceptable for a film expecting major distribution. It stipulated rules against profanity, the depiction of miscegenation, and offensive portrayals of the clergy, but a lot of it was based around sexual content: “sexual perversion” of any kind was disallowed, as were any opaquely textual or visual allusions to reproduction, and right near the top “No licentious or suggestiv

Pixar Sundays: The Incredibles (2004)

          Brad Bird was already a master by the time he came to Pixar. Not only did he hone his craft as an early director on The Simpsons , but he directed a little animated film for Warner Bros. in 1999, that though not a box office success was loved by critics and quickly grew a cult following. The Iron Giant is now among many people’s favourite animated movies. Likewise, Bird’s feature debut at Pixar, The Incredibles , his own variation of a superhero movie, is often considered one of the studio’s best. And for very good reason, as the most talented director at Pixar shows.            Superheroes were once the world’s greatest crime-fighting force until several lawsuits for collateral damage (and in the case of Mr. Incredible, a hilarious suicide prevention), outlawed their vigilantism. Fifteen years later Mr. Incredible, now living as Bob Parr, has a family with his wife Helen, the former Elastigirl. But Bob, in a combination of mid-life crisis and nostalgia for the old day