Skip to main content

Here Comes Santa Klaus


Though Disney has become a terrifyingly powerful media conglomerate impossible to avoid in modern discussions of cinema, there are still those who remember and understand what made Disney special in decades past. When artistry and commercialism seemed to go hand-in-hand, imagination and magic were studio emphasized brandings that were somewhat accurate. Its’ earliest features inspired hundreds of subsequent animators and studios, and fostered the talents of others. One of those was Sergio Pablos, a Spanish animator who began working at Disney in the 90’s as a character designer on the likes of The Hunchback of Notre Dame, Hercules, and Tarzan. Subsequently he conceived Despicable Me for Universal, but never stepped into the directors’ chair until Netflix gave him and his newly formed animation studio the opportunity to produce an original, traditionally-animated movie.
That is a big deal. Traditional animation is essentially dead in North American cinema, and certainly no prominent studio would take the risk of attempting to revive it, even Disney –the only company that meaningfully could- despite the fact as numerous non-American animated films have proven, the hand-drawn (or hand-drawn simulated) 2D form still reigns supreme in terms of aesthetic creativity and visual splendour. Klaus, Pablos’ Christmas movie that acts as a mythic yet contemporary origin story for Santa Claus, is a Spanish production but an English-language film, complete with name voice talent and American screenwriters. Most importantly though, it feels like an American animated feature for the fact it owes so much stylistically to the Disney legacy.
This is particularly evident in the characters, who have an energy and expressiveness very reminiscent of classic Disney (and here and there, elements of late Disney, two of the leads bearing similar designs to Treasure Planet for example –which Pablos had worked on); though the Mouse isn’t the only source -the character designers (including animator extraordinaire James Baxter) apparently taking cues from Don Bluth, early DreamWorks (notably The Prince of Egypt), and even Warner Brothers cartoons. Yet for as familiar as the animation on Klaus is, it’s also newly innovative, abundantly unique, and utterly spellbinding. The deep textures and volumetric lighting give the film a distinctly rich look that conveys the illusion of 3D renderings of 2D illustrations. It’s a technique that is sharp and captivating, and really works to the advantage of the environment -which is a far north settlement in Svalbard, cold and desolate and imposing. Therein the highly expressionist, rigid look of the architecture and dreary, colourless veneer of the foggy climate stands in sharp contrast to the boldly eclectic and aesthetically lunatic tendencies of the character animation. And yet such backgrounds are among the most striking visual components of the film, especially in daylight. The movie is just all round a cornucopia of glorious hand-crafted imagery that any animation fan would adore.
The narrative itself is eventually pretty good too, in spite of an uneven start. While the holiday icon has the films’ title, its’ protagonist is actually an arrogant, wealthy, and spoiled young postman called Jesper (voiced by Jason Schwartzman) sent to a remote island in the Arctic Sea to be the local mail carrier for its isolated village. The characters’ bratty attitude, mean-spirited sarcasm, and whininess is an obnoxious throwback to David Spade’s equally insufferable pampered prince in Disney’s Emperor’s New Groove, but fortunately Jesper becomes more bearable as the film goes on and Schwartzman plays his personal journey with apt conviction. Where Klaus himself is introduced, voiced with solemn gravity by J.K. Simmons, the film takes a Santa Claus: The Movie approach to his provenance and personality: he’s a woodsman with a very sad backstory and a consequent penchant for making toys, who strikes up a partnership with Jesper to deliver them to the village’s forsaken children. And it’s with the meeting of these two characters that the story improves considerably, that the films’ soul and meaning begin to take shape and it doesn’t let up for the duration of the runtime. Not only is it just a neat and engaging origin for the Santa Claus figure, but the film is made noticeably warmer for this friendship and the heartwarming holiday spirit it takes pleasure in.
As sentimental as it may seem, the movies’ virtuousness really goes a long way towards rendering it endearing –not a surprise really for a film that aims to be a holiday classic. It’s no accident that the villain of the piece is less a singular figure as it is essentially hate itself, and that the most lovable embodiment of the ripple effect of altruism, generosity, charity, and kindness is an adorable little Sámi girl called Márgu. The movie has its priorities straight and in following through on its precepts, showing why what Klaus and Jesper are doing is a noble thing and how it affects change for the better both personally and universally; it accentuates the movies’ charm and thematic grandeur.
The movie is funny, much more so than the trailer let on (in fact it’s often wild and very creative with its’ humour), and in addition to Schwartzman and Simmons, the voice cast features a great Rashida Jones and Joan Cusack, the former as the towns’ cynical schoolteacher and obligatory love interest.  It’s true the film doesn’t exactly skirt conventions with its clichés, another staple no doubt adapted from Disney. But it does convey them through a different lens and an enrapturing style that spurns the homogeneity that exists in a lot of American film animation today. Klaus is a wonderful Christmas movie, one that may have real staying power, and it’s a reason for optimism for Netflix’s (and other streaming services’) future endeavours in animation.

Support me on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/JordanBosch
Follow me on Twitter: https://twitter.com/Jordan_D_Bosch

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Notes on the Title Cards of The Lord of the Rings

It might be sacrilege for one who both considers The Lord of the Rings  trilogy to be one of the greatest triumphs of cinema and has been an avid lover of the films since adolescence, to declare that the original theatrical cuts of the films are better than the much beloved extended editions. Easily it’s my most controversial opinion regarding these movies. Don’t get me wrong, I do like the extended editions quite a lot, especially as someone who just enjoys spending time in that universe. They flesh it out more, add extra flavour, and in increasing the length by about an hour really emphasize the epic quality of these films. But I find that the original cuts are generally more cleanly paced, more seamlessly edited, and much more accessible to audiences. All the stuff there is to love about The Lord of the Rings  is there in the original versions, the plethora of new and extended scenes merely add to that for fans. And of those, they fall into three camps for me: 1....

The Subtle Sensitivity of the Cinema of Wong Kar-wai

When I think of Wong Kar-wai, I think of nighttime and neon lights, I think of the image of lonely people sitting in cafes or bars as the world passes behind them, mere flashes of movement; I think of love and quiet, sombre heartbreak, the sensuality that exists between people but is rarely fully or openly expressed. Mostly I think of the mood of melancholy, yet how this can be beautiful, colourful, inspiring even. A feeling of gloominess at the complexity of messy human relationships, though tinged with an unmitigated joy in the sensation of that feeling. And a warmth, generated by light and colour, that cuts through to the solitude of our very soul. This isn’t a broadly definitive quality of Wong’s body of work -certainly it isn’t so much true of his martial arts films Ashes of Time  and The Grandmaster. But those most affectionate movies on my memory: Chungking Express , Fallen Angels , Happy Together , 2046 , of course  In the Mood for Love , and even My Blueberry Nig...

The Prince of Egypt: The Humanized Exodus

Moses and the story of the Exodus is one of the most influential mythologies of world history. It’s a centrepoint of the Abrahamic religions, and has directly influenced the society, culture, values, and laws of many civilizations. Not to mention, it’s a very powerful story, and one that unsurprisingly continues to resonate incredibly across the globe. In western culture, the story of Moses has been retold dozens of times in various mediums, most recognizably in the last century through film. And these adaptations have ranged from the iconic: Cecil B. DeMille’s The Ten Commandments;  to the infamous: Ridley Scott’s Exodus: Gods and Kings . But everyone seems to forget the one movie between those two that I’d argue has them both beat. As perhaps the best telling of one of the most influential stories of all time, I feel people don’t talk about The Prince of Egypt  nearly enough. The 1998 animated epic from DreamWorks is a breathtakingly stunning, concise but compelling, ...