Skip to main content

Scorsese and Friends Solemnly Reflect on a Career of ‘Painting Houses’


There’s been a lot of stupid discourse surrounding Martin Scorsese lately because so many people are upset or delighted that he’s not too keen on Marvel movies, and it’s all so tiresome and unimportant. He hasn’t done much to discourage this obnoxious debate of course, but its’ even more annoying seeing industry professionals, big name actors and directors criticizing the guy (none worse than the Russo Brothers) for daring to voice an unpopular opinion on the most popular movies on the planet. And it’s distracting from why we should be talking about Scorsese right now –his new movie that is one of his most ambitious in a career not wanting for risky endeavours. A gangster epic that reteams him with Robert De Niro and Joe Pesci for the first time in twenty-four years and reaffirms why he’s one of our most revered filmmakers.
Of course The Irishman, based on the book I Heard You Paint Houses by Charles Brandt, has actually been a passion project of De Niro’s for about fifteen years, who brought Scorsese onboard before the film was consigned to development hell for over a decade. It was the confirmed casting of Al Pacino (who in four decades had never worked with Scorsese before) and Pesci (coming out of retirement for one last project with Scorsese and De Niro) that finally gained the film traction, and though no major studio was willing to foot the bill for the long and expensive crime drama, Netflix bought the rights, meaning that after a brief theatrical run (which I was lucky enough to catch) it’ll be arriving on the platform available for widespread consumption –not ideal for Scorsese, but at least with his vision intact.
In it, De Niro plays mob hitman Frank Sheeran, and the decades-spanning film follows his rise in the employ of Russell Bufalino (Pesci) and subsequent work for and friendship with Jimmy Hoffa (Pacino) at the height of his popularity as head of the Teamsters Union. Making liberal use of CGI de-aging visual effects to resurrect its’ lead stars in their prime, the film is a contemplative slow burn (at three and a half hours total runtime) that chooses not to focus on the action and violence typical of gangster films –and especially this movies’ most obvious cousin, Scorsese’s 1990 mafia classic Goodfellas –but instead hones in on such a lifestyle and what it does to a person. De Niro’s Sheeran is an ambitious and effective enforcer, clever and loyal if lacking in social graces, but a man with a compromised conscience, an almost apathetic inability to see the long-term consequences of just being associated with figures like Hoffa and Bufalino, and a complacent distance from any meaningful connection to his family. He only lives for the life of crime, yet never seems to enjoy it the way Goodfellas’ Henry Hill did.
However, he does manage to forge a real friendship with Hoffa, standing by him from the Kennedy election through Hoffa’s imprisonment and up to his famous disappearance –on which the movie poses a potential theory. Regardless, as the film presents the tumult of the 60’s and 70’s as they concerned Hoffa, we see this relationship grow, the chemistry between De Niro and Pacino well-established and completely apparent here. Indeed, one of the films’ small delights is in seeing these legends (Pesci included of course) merely interacting in otherwise monotonous conversations or negotiations or strategizing, tinged with instances of well-timed humour (the movie is actually fairly funny, employing some of the same narration and metatextual techniques Scorsese incorporated into The Wolf of Wall Street). At times, it’s just enough to see such figures sharing the screen in 2019 and delivering exemplary dialogue from Steven Zaillian’s sharp yet heavily humanist script; especially when you factor in an appearance from Harvey Keitel and realize all of Scorsese’s regular players of the 70’s and 80’s are together again.
And I don’t think it’s an accident. The Irishman is a very self-reflective film that intentionally hearkens back to Scorsese’s earlier career. Much like Quentin Tarantino’s Once Upon a Time in Hollywood, this movie really feels like a filmmaker coming to terms with his legacy, thoughtfully considering how far he’s come, expressing some regrets, and attempting to reconcile his place in a changing world. Of course, Scorsese is a much more accomplished and versatile director than Tarantino, but he seems to be drawing in some part from a like source. In the way The Irishman pensively examines and challenges themes of friendship and trust and the price of violence and greed over a long period of time, there’s something of Sergio Leone’s crime odyssey Once Upon a Time in America to the film. Certainly, Scorsese at least equals Leone in the sad, melancholy place he ends his story.
The last half-hour brutally emphasizes these themes, and better than nearly any other mafia movie de-glamorizes organized crime by showing exactly where it will lead a life. Though you never quite sympathize with Sheeran due to the choices he makes, the film ultimately conveys him as a pitiful old figure with some of the gut-punchiest commentary on aging, remorse, and loss that I’ve seen on film in some time. And the final shot, evocative of another famous final shot, is especially poignant.
The movies’ biggest obstacle is foreseeably enough some of the de-aging effects. The further back the story is set the more plastic De Niro’s face looks (particularly one brief flashback to the war). He and Pesci especially don’t quite look real in many of the scenes set in the 50’s and early 60’s, and the way their characters move is sometimes odd, clearly the result of actors in their seventies physically acting out characters in their forties. It’s considerably better in the later decades though where any digital touch-ups to De Niro and Pacino are barely noticeable and the actors are compelling enough to overpower the occasional weak spot.
But on a movie like this a technical imperfection in the make-up is far from a deal-breaker when virtually everything else is done so well. De Niro delivers possibly his best performance of the decade, Pacino is as dedicated and bombastic as ever, and years of retirement haven’t hindered Pesci’s ability to own every scene he’s in. Outside of these major New Hollywood stars, Scorsese fills his supporting cast with veterans of the HBO shows he produced: Ray Romano of Vinyl, Stephen Graham of Boardwalk Empire, Bobby Canavale of both (Boardwalk Empire’s Aleksa Palladino and Jack Huston appear in minor roles as well), alongside a large ensemble that also includes Jesse Plemmons and a tremendously icy Anna Paquin. Additionally, Scorsese has his long-time collaborators Robbie Robertson delivering an excellent score, and Thelma Schoonmaker (a legend in her own right) editing with a precision and sharpness that rivals any of her younger colleagues. And the director himself divests an unbelievable amount of effort and stamina to the film, likely in the knowledge it’s his last gangster picture, determined to leave audiences with a monument of a movie and some meaningful final words.

Support me on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/JordanBosch
Follow me on Twitter: https://twitter.com/Jordan_D_Bosch

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Disney's Mulan, Cultural Appropriation, and Exploitation

I’m late on this one I know. I wasn’t willing to spend thirty bucks back in September for a movie experience I knew was going to be far poorer than if I had paid half that at a theatre. So I waited for it to hit streaming for free to give it a shot. In the meantime I heard that it wasn’t very good, but I remained determined not to skip it entirely, partly out of sympathy for director Niki Caro and partly out of morbid curiosity. Disney’s live-action Mulan  I was actually mildly looking forward to early in the year in spite of my well-documented distaste for this series of creative dead zones by the most powerful media conglomerate on earth. Mulan  was never one of Disney’s classics, a movie extremely of its time in its “girl power” gender politics and with a decidedly American take on ancient Chinese mythology. It got by on a couple good songs and a strong lead, but it was a movie that could be improved upon, and this new version looked like it had the potential to do that, emphasizing

The Hays Code was Bad, Sex in Movies is Good

Don't Look Now (1973) Will Hays, Who Knows About Sex In 1930, former Republican politician and chair of the Motion Picture Association of America Will Hayes introduced a series of self-censorship guidelines for the movie industry in response to a mixture of celebrity scandals and lobbying from the Catholic Church against various ‘immoralities’ creating a perception of Hollywood as corrupt and indecent. The Hays Code, or the Motion Picture Production Code, was formally adopted in 1930, though not stringently enforced until 1934 under the auspices of Joseph Breen. It laid out a careful list of what was and wasn’t acceptable for a film expecting major distribution. It stipulated rules against profanity, the depiction of miscegenation, and offensive portrayals of the clergy, but a lot of it was based around sexual content: “sexual perversion” of any kind was disallowed, as were any opaquely textual or visual allusions to reproduction, and right near the top “No licentious or suggestiv

Pixar Sundays: The Incredibles (2004)

          Brad Bird was already a master by the time he came to Pixar. Not only did he hone his craft as an early director on The Simpsons , but he directed a little animated film for Warner Bros. in 1999, that though not a box office success was loved by critics and quickly grew a cult following. The Iron Giant is now among many people’s favourite animated movies. Likewise, Bird’s feature debut at Pixar, The Incredibles , his own variation of a superhero movie, is often considered one of the studio’s best. And for very good reason, as the most talented director at Pixar shows.            Superheroes were once the world’s greatest crime-fighting force until several lawsuits for collateral damage (and in the case of Mr. Incredible, a hilarious suicide prevention), outlawed their vigilantism. Fifteen years later Mr. Incredible, now living as Bob Parr, has a family with his wife Helen, the former Elastigirl. But Bob, in a combination of mid-life crisis and nostalgia for the old day