Skip to main content

The Criterion Channel Presents: Meek's Cutoff (2010)


Before making her great indie hit Certain Women, Kelly Reichardt directed a little-known western that’s never had a Criterion release in spite of its current availability on the Criterion Channel. Anyway, it’s called Meek’s Cutoff and it’s pretty good. It’s based on the true story of how Stephen Meek (here played by an unrecognizable Bruce Greenwood) disastrously led a wagon train through the Oregon desert on what was planned to be a two-week journey that ballooned into longer than five. However the film, in addition to stripping the trains’ company down to three couples and a child, centres the focus on the women, specifically Michelle Williams’ Emily Tetherow. And Reichardt is really serious about that female point of view, in some scenes framing the men (Neal Huff, Paul Dano, and Will Patton) and Meek in the background, talking and arguing amongst themselves in half-audible dialogue, while the wives (Williams, Shirley Henderson, and Zoe Kazan) aren’t permitted to contribute, their fates solely in the hands of their husbands. In fact, the women characters don’t often speak at all unless with their husbands, not even socializing much with each other as one might expect. This might be the first western I’ve seen to really acknowledge the history of the old west and what living in it meant for women, illustrating well their forced passivity. Yet the movie also shows the resilience embedded through this kind of life, particularly in how Emily copes with the whole ordeal. She also shows great strength of conviction when she comes to the defence of a Cayuse (Rod Rondeaux) they capture along the way, subtly demonstrating her far superior empathy and leadership skills in a manner that feels completely organic.
Reichardt’s minimalist style serves her well here. The sound mixing, which often renders some voices incoherent, dull costuming, and use of what seems to be natural lighting creates an authentic atmosphere of meandering aimlessly through a vast wilderness, with a tone of melancholy gradually turning to despair like a much less tedious version of what Gus Van Sant tried to evoke in Gerry. The mood has a wistful mellowness to it and the cinematography is utterly engrossing. There’s a real beauty to how the film is composed. In what might be one of my favourite uses of double exposure in a movie ever, Reichardt slowly transitions from one landscape shot to another by overlapping them with such grace that it’s downright awe-inspiring to watch. Moments like this alone make Meek’s Cutoff, a fascinating, illuminating feminist western worth watching for any fan of contemplative indie movies.

Criterion Recommendation: Holy Motors (2012)
Few movies of the past decade are as uniquely captivating as Leos Carax’s bizarre and fascinating Holy Motors, a film about art, identity, and cinema itself. Ambiguous even in its premise, it follows a man called Mr. Oscar (Denis Lavant), a kind of actor, as he plays a wild variety of characters through a twenty-four hour period in Paris. A movie that demands to be dissected, it is gloomy yet joyous, absurd yet deep, incomprehensible yet transparent, fragmented yet whole. Its cast includes both distinguished French luminaries Michel Piccoli and Édith Scob (in a great nod to Eyes Without a Face), and international superstars Kylie Minogue and Eva Mendes, the latter of whom called the film “the coolest, most creative thing I’ve ever done”. It’s a marvellously strange, surreal, sensational, provocative, and brilliant work of art that deserves a place in the Criterion Collection for its awesome accordion interlude alone.
Support me on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/JordanBosch
Follow me on Twitter: https://twitter.com/Jordan_D_Bosch
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Strange History of the American Spoof Movie

Parody movies have been around for a lot longer than we tend to think of them. Even from the earliest days of Hollywood there were movies meant to satirize a particular subject or genre. In the silent era, Buster Keaton was responsible for a few. And in the early sound era, almost as soon as the monster pictures took off did you see comic versions of them -Abbott and Costello hosting a few. But parody movies tended to be subtle for most of cinema history, or parody came in conjunction with another goal of the comedy. It really wasn’t until the 1980s and 90s that it took off and became popularly understood. And there is perhaps a line to be drawn to the counterculture comedy explosion that began in the 1970s through avenues like  Saturday Night Live , which frequently parodied from even its earliest years popular movies and cultural properties of the time. But that is still a way’s back. To my generation though, ‘parody movie’ is perhaps a less known term than the more blunt ‘s...
Post a Comment
Read more

Notes on the Title Cards of The Lord of the Rings

It might be sacrilege for one who both considers The Lord of the Rings  trilogy to be one of the greatest triumphs of cinema and has been an avid lover of the films since adolescence, to declare that the original theatrical cuts of the films are better than the much beloved extended editions. Easily it’s my most controversial opinion regarding these movies. Don’t get me wrong, I do like the extended editions quite a lot, especially as someone who just enjoys spending time in that universe. They flesh it out more, add extra flavour, and in increasing the length by about an hour really emphasize the epic quality of these films. But I find that the original cuts are generally more cleanly paced, more seamlessly edited, and much more accessible to audiences. All the stuff there is to love about The Lord of the Rings  is there in the original versions, the plethora of new and extended scenes merely add to that for fans. And of those, they fall into three camps for me: 1....
1 comment
Read more

Back to the Feature: New York, New York (1977)

New York, New York  is a two hour forty minute musical movie largely about a toxic relationship and I understand why it was Martin Scorsese’s first big flop. Some have blamed its poor reception on the kind of movie it was, of a style and tone Scorsese wasn’t known for, but I find that hard to believe. Even after only five films, he’d proven himself an extremely versatile director, and Alice Doesn’t Live Here Anymore  found an audience. Sure this jazz musical love letter to New York City was following up Taxi Driver and its’ far more cynical take on the city, but then it’s also ‘from the director of Taxi Driver ’ which itself was a big hit. Was it a matter of public appetite for musicals, or mere word of mouth and early critical reception that dissuaded viewers? Irrespective of that, I was stunned to discover this movie was the origin of the titular song, which I’d assumed was much older (it’s definitely got the sound of something that might have come out of the Jazz sce...
Post a Comment
Read more