Skip to main content

The Criterion Channel Presents: Bob & Carol & Ted & Alice (1969)


Probably one of the most important movies of the 1960s sexual revolution is Bob & Carol & Ted & Alice. Coming out the same year as Andy Warhol’s seminal erotic film Blue Movie, Paul Mazursky’s feature directing debut was a slightly more conventionally tasteful alternative to that explicit art piece. However it still dealt in ideas unthinkable in Hollywood only a decade before. It’s about a well-off Los Angeles couple Bob (Robert Culp) and Carol Sanders (Natalie Wood), who return from a relationship therapy retreat with more open and experimental ideas regarding sex and marriage, and their conservative friends Ted (Elliott Gould) and Alice Henderson (Dyan Cannon) reacting to this. Boasting a sharp script and strong characters, the film epitomizes (albeit a bit late) the 60’s ideologies of free love and sexual openness, as it explores first Bob and then Carol’s infidelities, and Ted and Alice’s initial distaste but growing curiosity for their friends’ new lifestyle. Such betrayals are justified as harmless in the former couples’ eyes through their belief in and the films’ major theme on the distinction between love and sex -something that Mazursky isn’t quite as sure about as his characters, given how the climactic scene plays out, when Ted and Alice finally are seduced over to their friends’ side and participate in the movies’ famous partner-swapping foursome. 
Yet there is still a kind of idealization of sexual liberation in the implicit revitalizing power it has on both relationships, and the parade of couples (many of whom are mixed race and ages, and even a couple homosexual) who illustrate the final moments. Gould and Cannon are the movies’ lifeblood, acting as the films’ conscious avatars for a large portion of its audience -needing to be if not convinced, at least made to understand as much as most non-hippie viewers, the taboo practices of their counterparts. The movie gets by on some good humour as well, from the awkward Ted and Alice being somewhat uncomfortable in Bob and Carol’s newfound closeness to each other (and them), to Bob having a civil and friendly conversation with the frightened tennis instructor Carol had just slept with. But most of all given its purpose, Bob & Carol & Ted & Alice is sexy. I’m not going to deny the sexual appeal of Wood or Cannon, and though I don’t swing that way I can fathom an attractiveness to Culp or Gould (provided 1960’s body hair isn’t a turn-off). These are attractive people in a movie about sex at a significant juncture in the culture around it, and they aren’t afraid to show off and discuss sexuality. Regardless of your opinions of the ideas depicted, it was a bold film then and still a bold film now.

Criterion Recommendation: The Shawshank Redemption (1994)
The twenty-fifth anniversary of this American masterpiece is as good a time as any to induct it into the Criterion Collection. The Shawshank Redemption is for my money one of the greatest movies ever made; a beautiful film about endurance, friendship, and hope as it chronicles the twenty year incarceration of an innocent man in a corrupt Maine penitentiary. Its’ marvellous cinematography, muted aesthetic, and claustrophobic sensibility is matched by an excellence of storytelling and character development most movies can only dream of, and stupendous performances by Tim Robbins, Morgan Freeman, Bob Gunton, and James Whitmore that are respectively entrancing, sombre, frustrating, and heartbreaking. It’s part of an exclusive club of films that never fail to lift my spirits. If you haven’t already, watch it, watch it again, and then watch it a third time, and I defy you to justify why it isn’t included in such a great cinematic canon as Criterion.

Support me on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/JordanBosch
Follow me on Twitter: https://twitter.com/Jordan_D_Bosch
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Disney's Mulan, Cultural Appropriation, and Exploitation

I’m late on this one I know. I wasn’t willing to spend thirty bucks back in September for a movie experience I knew was going to be far poorer than if I had paid half that at a theatre. So I waited for it to hit streaming for free to give it a shot. In the meantime I heard that it wasn’t very good, but I remained determined not to skip it entirely, partly out of sympathy for director Niki Caro and partly out of morbid curiosity. Disney’s live-action Mulan  I was actually mildly looking forward to early in the year in spite of my well-documented distaste for this series of creative dead zones by the most powerful media conglomerate on earth. Mulan  was never one of Disney’s classics, a movie extremely of its time in its “girl power” gender politics and with a decidedly American take on ancient Chinese mythology. It got by on a couple good songs and a strong lead, but it was a movie that could be improved upon, and this new version looked like it had the potential to do that, emphasizing
Post a Comment
Read more

The Hays Code was Bad, Sex in Movies is Good

Don't Look Now (1973) Will Hays, Who Knows About Sex In 1930, former Republican politician and chair of the Motion Picture Association of America Will Hayes introduced a series of self-censorship guidelines for the movie industry in response to a mixture of celebrity scandals and lobbying from the Catholic Church against various ‘immoralities’ creating a perception of Hollywood as corrupt and indecent. The Hays Code, or the Motion Picture Production Code, was formally adopted in 1930, though not stringently enforced until 1934 under the auspices of Joseph Breen. It laid out a careful list of what was and wasn’t acceptable for a film expecting major distribution. It stipulated rules against profanity, the depiction of miscegenation, and offensive portrayals of the clergy, but a lot of it was based around sexual content: “sexual perversion” of any kind was disallowed, as were any opaquely textual or visual allusions to reproduction, and right near the top “No licentious or suggestiv
Post a Comment
Read more

Pixar Sundays: The Incredibles (2004)

          Brad Bird was already a master by the time he came to Pixar. Not only did he hone his craft as an early director on The Simpsons , but he directed a little animated film for Warner Bros. in 1999, that though not a box office success was loved by critics and quickly grew a cult following. The Iron Giant is now among many people’s favourite animated movies. Likewise, Bird’s feature debut at Pixar, The Incredibles , his own variation of a superhero movie, is often considered one of the studio’s best. And for very good reason, as the most talented director at Pixar shows.            Superheroes were once the world’s greatest crime-fighting force until several lawsuits for collateral damage (and in the case of Mr. Incredible, a hilarious suicide prevention), outlawed their vigilantism. Fifteen years later Mr. Incredible, now living as Bob Parr, has a family with his wife Helen, the former Elastigirl. But Bob, in a combination of mid-life crisis and nostalgia for the old day
1 comment
Read more