Skip to main content

RIFFA Day 4: Narrative Features, International and LGBTQ Shorts

Eva Löbau's Alice anxiously awaits an interview in The Chairs Game
       The great bragging rights of attending a film festival is getting to see movies, sometimes great movies, before the rest of the world. I know I’m envious of the lucky folks at Cannes who have already seen Bong Joon-ho’s Parasites, Celine Sciamma’s Portrait of a Lady on Fire, or Robert Eggers’ The Lighthouse. And on the fourth day of RIFFA I felt at least a sampling of that kind of privilege. At last I got to see a couple narrative features from little-known international directors that probably won’t ultimately be seen by a substantial audience. And that is a great shame. Rafiki was such a film, which I saw earlier this year, and is still one of my favourites. But the least I can do is tell people about these movies.
Crush My Heart is an interesting one. An Austrian movie about a Romeo & Juliet kind of romance that forms between two teenagers trapped in the grips of a Romani mob. It’s the feature debut of writer-director Alexandra Makarová, who cuts it into four parts following the evolution of the relationship between Pepe (Roman Pokuta) and Marcela (Simona Kovácová), leant to Pepe’s vile uncle Rocky (Frantisek Balog) in fulfilment of her fathers’ debt. The film is quite harsh by implication, often miserable due to the circumstances depicted and its plot is relatively formulaic. Through the shifting tones of heightened romance and pessimism though, the movie is carried by a magnetic performance from Kovácová and a monstrously lecherous one from Balog.
However the prize for best performance of the day from an actor I'd never heard of goes to Eva Löbau in The Chairs Game, another feature debut from Lucia Chiarla based on her own short film. It's a film about a lethargic freelancer called Alice in Berlin who's having trouble making ends meet as she struggles with depression and her finances, resulting in her going to some very irresponsible places and taking extreme measures to stay afloat. As farcical as the movie often is, the sadness of Alice's predicament and mental illness is pervasive, you feel immense empathy in spite of her rabbit hole of lies and procrastination. It's a truly marvellous performance from Löbau, one of my favourites of the year, and Chiarla directs with apt visual and narrative prowess (she really knows how to use blank space to create an atmosphere of emptiness) and admirable humanity. Easily, one of the festival's best.
After two features I decided to check out a series of international short films: Fatimah, a Jordanian documentary of a young girl's life in a Syrian refugee camp (the ubiquity of flies was particularly striking); 2nd Class, a Swedish film wherein a teacher educates the son of a Nazi who attacked her on the importance of love; Line of Duty, an Indian examination of the hate and paranoia that fuels war; and Touttay, an experimental Indian film about freedom of thought, juxtaposing the performance art of a banned poem about Gandhi with the creation and realization of such an adaptation. I was unimpressed that a lot of my audience walked out of this film, presumably due to its unconventional nature -or perhaps its length at a towering fifty minutes. I found it to be quite interesting.
At the end of the night, I made a point to check out the group screening of LGBTQ themed shorts. The Estonian Tomorrow Island, about a Soviet agent attempting to escort her lover across the Bering Strait was very good until its annoyingly clichéd and disappointing ending. Much better was a Dutch film Dante vs. Mohammad Ali about the romance that develops between two boxing opponents in the Dutch countryside. Jack and Anna, an American film based on a true story, touches on lesbian and trans themes as it depicts the discovery in 1913 of a relationship between two women, one of whom has been secretly living as a man. And lastly, fed up with so many queer stories ending in tragedy, If You Dare Desire... takes the Tarantino approach of rewriting the real suicide of two Indian girls, allowing them to circumvent the circumstances of their deaths whilst focusing on their difficult yet tender relationship. There's an ethical debate to be had here, but for what it's worth the depiction of the girls is heartfelt and respectful, both actresses are great, and the film expresses a strong assertiveness not common enough in LGBTQ oriented media.
And thus it's with a heavy heart that I come to the end of the film screenings of RIFFA. In four days I've seen twenty-nine movies from across ten countries and sat for panels and a master class. What a week! Tomorrow I will beguile with the close of the festival, the Red Carpet and Awards show at Casino Regina.

Support me on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/JordanBosch
Follow me on Twitter: https://twitter.com/Jordan_D_Bosch

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Strange History of the American Spoof Movie

Parody movies have been around for a lot longer than we tend to think of them. Even from the earliest days of Hollywood there were movies meant to satirize a particular subject or genre. In the silent era, Buster Keaton was responsible for a few. And in the early sound era, almost as soon as the monster pictures took off did you see comic versions of them -Abbott and Costello hosting a few. But parody movies tended to be subtle for most of cinema history, or parody came in conjunction with another goal of the comedy. It really wasn’t until the 1980s and 90s that it took off and became popularly understood. And there is perhaps a line to be drawn to the counterculture comedy explosion that began in the 1970s through avenues like  Saturday Night Live , which frequently parodied from even its earliest years popular movies and cultural properties of the time. But that is still a way’s back. To my generation though, ‘parody movie’ is perhaps a less known term than the more blunt ‘s...

Notes on the Title Cards of The Lord of the Rings

It might be sacrilege for one who both considers The Lord of the Rings  trilogy to be one of the greatest triumphs of cinema and has been an avid lover of the films since adolescence, to declare that the original theatrical cuts of the films are better than the much beloved extended editions. Easily it’s my most controversial opinion regarding these movies. Don’t get me wrong, I do like the extended editions quite a lot, especially as someone who just enjoys spending time in that universe. They flesh it out more, add extra flavour, and in increasing the length by about an hour really emphasize the epic quality of these films. But I find that the original cuts are generally more cleanly paced, more seamlessly edited, and much more accessible to audiences. All the stuff there is to love about The Lord of the Rings  is there in the original versions, the plethora of new and extended scenes merely add to that for fans. And of those, they fall into three camps for me: 1....

Back to the Feature: New York, New York (1977)

New York, New York  is a two hour forty minute musical movie largely about a toxic relationship and I understand why it was Martin Scorsese’s first big flop. Some have blamed its poor reception on the kind of movie it was, of a style and tone Scorsese wasn’t known for, but I find that hard to believe. Even after only five films, he’d proven himself an extremely versatile director, and Alice Doesn’t Live Here Anymore  found an audience. Sure this jazz musical love letter to New York City was following up Taxi Driver and its’ far more cynical take on the city, but then it’s also ‘from the director of Taxi Driver ’ which itself was a big hit. Was it a matter of public appetite for musicals, or mere word of mouth and early critical reception that dissuaded viewers? Irrespective of that, I was stunned to discover this movie was the origin of the titular song, which I’d assumed was much older (it’s definitely got the sound of something that might have come out of the Jazz sce...