Skip to main content

RIFFA Day 3: Film Critic Master Class and Anthropocene

Klaus Eder talking film criticism with moderator Dilani Rabindran

       If there was a theme to the Third Day of RIFFA it's that the current state of affairs is bad. Whether it be personal technology, modern cinema, or the physical world as we've remade it, in the old vs. new debate the old was winning out, or at least being more vehemently argued for, while the problems in modernity were being spotlighted.
       Obviously such generalities are flawed though, and that's demonstrated by my first real disappointment of the festival. Selfless is a film that’s equal parts documentary, sermon, and Terrence Malick movie as it examines modern technology and social media dependence, on which it blames most problems facing today’s teenagers. It doesn’t seem to understand the neutrality of technology and social media though, that they’re only symptoms of much larger social and cultural institutions that don’t go away when you turn off your phone. Nor can the film grasp the irony of decrying the artificiality of such things whilst filtering and manufacturing most of its content to better align with its preconceived point. It’s a real shame this doc refused to plume to the root issues with the internet age and social media, interrogating the information it yields rather than the means in which that information is received; instead dwelling on superficial concerns from a decade ago, wistfully idolizing a British family who live off the grid, indulging in hollow acclamations on life and beauty, and affording screen-time to one of the most obnoxiously condescending human beings as an expert.
       My palette was thoroughly cleansed of this film though by attending Klaus Eder's master class "What Are Film Critics Good For?" It's always a delight to hear other critics discussing criticism, and especially when the man in question has served on the juries of Venice, TIFF, and Cannes, and came up in the profession during the height of the German New Wave (as he mentions a few times). He talked of the differences between European and North American critics, what the democratization of information and opinions has meant for art criticism, and defined real criticism as educating the public, encouraging them to think deeper about film and learn its history. Yet he was open to admitting to the subjective nature of criticism, that a films' merits can't be objectively determined; that a movies' resonance with the viewer is the most important thing. The greatest validation for a critic he explained is when someone goes to a movie and enjoys it because of his review. But of course, he seemed to have a dim view of much of modern cinema, which he expressed as much through his silence as otherwise, stating that he prefers old films as he gets older. I didn't agree with all of his points, but it was a wonderful, enlightening discussion nonetheless.
       I watched another German film afterwards, Break Free -Two People, Two Years, One Dream about a couple embarking on a road trip through Africa intended as six months but becoming two years. It's a journey of self-discovery as they find themselves in various communities, forging relationships, and enduring harsh conditions and illnesses, while being blockaded by political and bureaucratic red tape. It's charming and interesting, vivid at times, but with the pacing of a nature documentary. It also doesn't so much end as just stop, which was a bit jarring.
Trevor Herriott, Jennifer Baichwal, Sue Deranger, and Jared Clarke
       However, the poor, sometimes ugly conditions glimpsed in this movie served an effective preview for the ultimate event of the day: Anthropocene: The Human Epoch, the best film I've yet seen at the festival and one I wish I could have experienced on an IMAX screen! The Koyaanisqatsi of climate documentaries, it's a beautiful and beautifully harrowing exposé of the catastrophic impact human beings have had on the planet. Presented with only minimal interviews with impacted peoples and restrained narration by Alicia Vikander, it allows the imagery and visual language of worldwide ruination to convey much of its crucial message, hammering home the urgency of substantial action this way more powerfully than it ever could have under conventional means. It may be the best climate change documentary I've ever seen, a label that isn't quite accurate as climate change is only one part of the devastation illustrated. Director Jennifer Baichwal participated in a panel afterwards with writer Trevor Herriott, biologist and NDP hopeful Jared Clarke, and Indigenous climate activist Sue Deranger, the most blunt and impassioned of them all. It was grim, depressing, and frustrating to hear their talk about what's not being done, what should be done, and the near-impossibility that it will; and it's a discussion that needs to be had with more influential figures than us ecologically conscious artists and art fans.
       Of all the presentations I attended yesterday, the Anthropocene showing and panel had the most legitimacy behind its condemnation of the modern world. And its implications will be on my mind through the rest of the festival and beyond.


Support me on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/JordanBosch
Follow me on Twitter: https://twitter.com/Jordan_D_Bosch

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Disney's Mulan, Cultural Appropriation, and Exploitation

I’m late on this one I know. I wasn’t willing to spend thirty bucks back in September for a movie experience I knew was going to be far poorer than if I had paid half that at a theatre. So I waited for it to hit streaming for free to give it a shot. In the meantime I heard that it wasn’t very good, but I remained determined not to skip it entirely, partly out of sympathy for director Niki Caro and partly out of morbid curiosity. Disney’s live-action Mulan  I was actually mildly looking forward to early in the year in spite of my well-documented distaste for this series of creative dead zones by the most powerful media conglomerate on earth. Mulan  was never one of Disney’s classics, a movie extremely of its time in its “girl power” gender politics and with a decidedly American take on ancient Chinese mythology. It got by on a couple good songs and a strong lead, but it was a movie that could be improved upon, and this new version looked like it had the potential to do that, emphasizing

The Hays Code was Bad, Sex in Movies is Good

Don't Look Now (1973) Will Hays, Who Knows About Sex In 1930, former Republican politician and chair of the Motion Picture Association of America Will Hayes introduced a series of self-censorship guidelines for the movie industry in response to a mixture of celebrity scandals and lobbying from the Catholic Church against various ‘immoralities’ creating a perception of Hollywood as corrupt and indecent. The Hays Code, or the Motion Picture Production Code, was formally adopted in 1930, though not stringently enforced until 1934 under the auspices of Joseph Breen. It laid out a careful list of what was and wasn’t acceptable for a film expecting major distribution. It stipulated rules against profanity, the depiction of miscegenation, and offensive portrayals of the clergy, but a lot of it was based around sexual content: “sexual perversion” of any kind was disallowed, as were any opaquely textual or visual allusions to reproduction, and right near the top “No licentious or suggestiv

Pixar Sundays: The Incredibles (2004)

          Brad Bird was already a master by the time he came to Pixar. Not only did he hone his craft as an early director on The Simpsons , but he directed a little animated film for Warner Bros. in 1999, that though not a box office success was loved by critics and quickly grew a cult following. The Iron Giant is now among many people’s favourite animated movies. Likewise, Bird’s feature debut at Pixar, The Incredibles , his own variation of a superhero movie, is often considered one of the studio’s best. And for very good reason, as the most talented director at Pixar shows.            Superheroes were once the world’s greatest crime-fighting force until several lawsuits for collateral damage (and in the case of Mr. Incredible, a hilarious suicide prevention), outlawed their vigilantism. Fifteen years later Mr. Incredible, now living as Bob Parr, has a family with his wife Helen, the former Elastigirl. But Bob, in a combination of mid-life crisis and nostalgia for the old day