Skip to main content

The Criterion Channel Presents: Dreams (1990)


“I had another dream.”
Akira Kurosawa had a lot on his mind in his later years, and his 1990 movie Dreams was his way of expressing it all in as close to tangible terms as he could. Coming five years after his last great epic Ran, it was the perfect movie to end his extraordinary career on (though he made two more before his death in 1998); being not only a supremely underrated movie but possibly Kurosawa’s most personal –it was his first since 1945 that he wrote independently. 
The film is comprised of a series of eight largely unrelated vignettes (though the last four seem to be linked by their themes and the presence of a wanderer protagonist played by Akira Terao -who looks suspiciously like Kurosawa himself). Each is supposedly based on recurring dreams Kurosawa has had throughout his life, and they’re utterly fascinating -from the dreamlike “Sunshine Through the Rain”, about a boy paying the price for his curiosity, to “The Tunnel”, an unnerving tale about a soldier haunted by the men he led into battle; “Crows”, which follows a man traversing the painted landscapes of Vincent van Gogh (played by Martin Scorsese of all people), to “The Weeping Demon”, set against the devastation of a world sapped of life. Through these parables, Kurosawa explores his childhood and lifelong fears and anxieties, his relationship to philosophy, mythology, life, death, art, and spirituality, and amid all the pessimism, the terror of environmental catastrophe, war, and nuclear apocalypse, he even dares to hope. It’s a viscerally rich, beautifully poetic statement on the world, the human spirit, our passions, our demons, and our collective impulse for destruction as Kurosawa sees it. 
And there’s so much incredible imagination on display to boot. This film allowed Kurosawa to immerse himself more fully in the fantastical, both drawing on Japanese mythology and conjuring his own magical dreamscapes to sensational results. It’s really a shame that he couldn’t use colour until late in his career, because he can work wonders with it. His painters’ touch is on display in the vivid art direction, costume design, and scene composition. It’s easily one of his most visually exciting and captivating movies. Of course, credit where it’s due, part of that is owing to his American benefactors –this was during the period when Kurosawa was very unpopular in Japan. His fans Steven Spielberg and George Lucas helped realize Dreams though, with Spielberg convincing Warner Brothers to distribute the film and Lucas providing the resources of ILM for its special effects. However even with those names attached, Dreams was merely a lukewarm hit, and is still overlooked next to his grander late-stage triumphs like Kagemusha and Ran. Perhaps it was because Dreams is quite unlike any other Kurosawa film, which is saying a lot given how distinct each of his films is. But I think it’s one of his greatest achievements, and I warrant no other movie is a greater ode to the man and the filmmaker that Kurosawa was.

Criterion Recommendation: Trainspotting (1996)
With a new Danny Boyle film out now, it’s a good time to recommend his very best movie for entry into the Criterion Collection. Almost certainly the most important Scottish film ever made, Trainspotting is about the lives of a gang of young heroin junkies in Edinburgh, left behind by a system that doesn’t care for the urban poor. It’s among the most harrowing portraits of addiction in cinema, with its hectic editing and cinematography, stylized and experimental direction, innovative narrative devices, and brilliant visual effects that range from evocative to terrifying, pulling you into the dingy underworld of drug abuse like no other. Yet it’s a remarkably lively movie, owing to the performances by an excellent cast whose careers were made by this film and a fun, contagious soundtrack. Trainspotting was said to have captured the youth of the 90’s and its effects have not since waned.

Support me on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/JordanBosch
Follow me on Twitter: https://twitter.com/Jordan_D_Bosch
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Strange History of the American Spoof Movie

Parody movies have been around for a lot longer than we tend to think of them. Even from the earliest days of Hollywood there were movies meant to satirize a particular subject or genre. In the silent era, Buster Keaton was responsible for a few. And in the early sound era, almost as soon as the monster pictures took off did you see comic versions of them -Abbott and Costello hosting a few. But parody movies tended to be subtle for most of cinema history, or parody came in conjunction with another goal of the comedy. It really wasn’t until the 1980s and 90s that it took off and became popularly understood. And there is perhaps a line to be drawn to the counterculture comedy explosion that began in the 1970s through avenues like  Saturday Night Live , which frequently parodied from even its earliest years popular movies and cultural properties of the time. But that is still a way’s back. To my generation though, ‘parody movie’ is perhaps a less known term than the more blunt ‘s...
Post a Comment
Read more

Notes on the Title Cards of The Lord of the Rings

It might be sacrilege for one who both considers The Lord of the Rings  trilogy to be one of the greatest triumphs of cinema and has been an avid lover of the films since adolescence, to declare that the original theatrical cuts of the films are better than the much beloved extended editions. Easily it’s my most controversial opinion regarding these movies. Don’t get me wrong, I do like the extended editions quite a lot, especially as someone who just enjoys spending time in that universe. They flesh it out more, add extra flavour, and in increasing the length by about an hour really emphasize the epic quality of these films. But I find that the original cuts are generally more cleanly paced, more seamlessly edited, and much more accessible to audiences. All the stuff there is to love about The Lord of the Rings  is there in the original versions, the plethora of new and extended scenes merely add to that for fans. And of those, they fall into three camps for me: 1....
1 comment
Read more

Back to the Feature: New York, New York (1977)

New York, New York  is a two hour forty minute musical movie largely about a toxic relationship and I understand why it was Martin Scorsese’s first big flop. Some have blamed its poor reception on the kind of movie it was, of a style and tone Scorsese wasn’t known for, but I find that hard to believe. Even after only five films, he’d proven himself an extremely versatile director, and Alice Doesn’t Live Here Anymore  found an audience. Sure this jazz musical love letter to New York City was following up Taxi Driver and its’ far more cynical take on the city, but then it’s also ‘from the director of Taxi Driver ’ which itself was a big hit. Was it a matter of public appetite for musicals, or mere word of mouth and early critical reception that dissuaded viewers? Irrespective of that, I was stunned to discover this movie was the origin of the titular song, which I’d assumed was much older (it’s definitely got the sound of something that might have come out of the Jazz sce...
Post a Comment
Read more