Skip to main content

Cinema's First Underdog Lacrosse Movie


The Grizzlies is a movie that has a lot going against it. First of all, it’s a small scale Canadian release set in Nunavut (which is a place so alien to most Canadians it might as well be another country), it has a white saviour by way of Freedom Writers complex as its plot, and it’s an underdog sports movie about lacrosse of all things. So it has an uphill battle in terms of audience attention and critical appraisal; and that’s not even addressing the fact it’s centred on an Inuit community, an area of focus that will always struggle against stories about white people. And The Grizzlies is certainly weakened by some of its choices that either repeat well-worn tropes or compromise its material to pander to white audiences, however there is a silver lining to it that renders it not dismissible.
Based on a true story, the film follows Russ Sheppard (Ben Schnetzer) a high school teacher suddenly given an appointment to the remote Nunavut town of Kugluktuk. Attempting to apply his customary southern teaching methods doesn’t work on his students, many of whom don’t even show up for school and have an immediate disrespect for them. Discovering the town has a high suicide rate and wanting the kids to have a positive force in their life, he introduces them to lacrosse. Gradually the kids become interested, eventually forming a team, with a chance even to play in a national convention down in Toronto.
This movie can’t get away from the fact that it’s another in a long line of white saviour stories where the problems of First Nations people are solved by a white man, which is at the very least a tiresome if not directly off-putting trope in media today. It’s worth noting that the film is to some degree aware of this though. Sheppard isn’t much of a likeable character, and at least at first, it’s intentional. He’s seen to be obtuse with his class early on and refuses to adjust to the local way of life.  He’s a representative to both them and us of everything wrong with southern white privilege, and the movie’s not afraid to call him out on his presumptuousness a couple times (by Tantoo Cardinal, who is terrific as the no-nonsense principal). However the remnants of this behaviour persist further into the film when narratively he’s supposed to be coming to an understanding with the kids. There’s a scene where he turns down an offer to join a family dinner and a couple instances where he makes an insulting comment about the land that feel less self-aware. He’s driven by a clear ego, taking it upon himself to assume what’s best for these kids right up till the end.
This might be unbearable if not for the characters and stories around him.  Whenever the plot veers into the troubled lives of the students the movie’s a lot more interesting. I’m way more invested in Zach (Paul Nutarariaq), Adam (Ricky Marty-Pahtaykan), Spring (Anna Lambe), Kyle (Booboo Stewart), and Miranda (Emerald MacDonald) than I am in Sheppard; because there’s genuine drama there, compelling issues to be addressed, and the actors are all doing a great job. Nutarariaq is especially captivating and sympathetic as the sardonic, short-tempered, and troubled Zach. But each one of them is handling tough material aptly, each one of them has a story and conflict that is worth exploring. By the end you understand these kids and where they’re coming from arguably better than Sheppard. But it is still Sheppard’s story. He’s the one with the straightest character arc and the focal point of the narrative. The Grizzlies is certainly a movie made for white audiences, incorporating white values and storytelling devices, and not ultimately following through with the socio-political and racial themes it presents. However in this regard, it is much better than something like Green Book, owing perhaps to the skillfulness of director Miranda de Pencier, whose work to highlight the cultural disparity ensures the film isn’t completely robbed of authenticity.
And credit where it’s due, this movie believably sells lacrosse as something teenagers would be into. It doesn’t present the sport and the teens own relationship to it in any unique way though, so the lacrosse-oriented scenes tend to be among the dullest. By its own admission the film omits several female players and doesn’t take any chances in structuring the teams’ journey. Even the ending, which is much more of the Cool Runnings variety than The Mighty Ducks, is very generic.
There is something to be said though for exposing audiences to a world that’s incredibly unfamiliar to them. Most Canadians have never been to Nunavut, let alone Kugluktuk, and so The Grizzlies did good by showcasing that environment and its customs. Despite the sometimes grim nature of the subject matter, it’s not as devoid of recognition as we might presume. Hopefully we’re not completely ignorant southerners too. I also admire the movie for opening with a trigger warning, which is bound to be mocked by idiots, over a couple scenes of domestic violence and suicide. This is a movie that wants to be a PSA, and I think including a notice like that is very considerate, and worth looking into as a substitute for a pre-movie MPAA sticker.
The Grizzlies is a mediocre movie with lots of little great movies showing up now and again throughout its runtime. The lives, drama, and significance of the Inuit students are wonderfully engaging, and showcase a lot of rising talent I’d like to see more of -and who alone make it a film worth seeing. But they’re bound within a tame execution and drearily placed focus that does little justice to a pretty inspiring story.

Support me on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/JordanBosch
Follow me on Twitter: https://twitter.com/Jordan_D_Bosch
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Strange History of the American Spoof Movie

Parody movies have been around for a lot longer than we tend to think of them. Even from the earliest days of Hollywood there were movies meant to satirize a particular subject or genre. In the silent era, Buster Keaton was responsible for a few. And in the early sound era, almost as soon as the monster pictures took off did you see comic versions of them -Abbott and Costello hosting a few. But parody movies tended to be subtle for most of cinema history, or parody came in conjunction with another goal of the comedy. It really wasn’t until the 1980s and 90s that it took off and became popularly understood. And there is perhaps a line to be drawn to the counterculture comedy explosion that began in the 1970s through avenues like  Saturday Night Live , which frequently parodied from even its earliest years popular movies and cultural properties of the time. But that is still a way’s back. To my generation though, ‘parody movie’ is perhaps a less known term than the more blunt ‘s...
Post a Comment
Read more

Notes on the Title Cards of The Lord of the Rings

It might be sacrilege for one who both considers The Lord of the Rings  trilogy to be one of the greatest triumphs of cinema and has been an avid lover of the films since adolescence, to declare that the original theatrical cuts of the films are better than the much beloved extended editions. Easily it’s my most controversial opinion regarding these movies. Don’t get me wrong, I do like the extended editions quite a lot, especially as someone who just enjoys spending time in that universe. They flesh it out more, add extra flavour, and in increasing the length by about an hour really emphasize the epic quality of these films. But I find that the original cuts are generally more cleanly paced, more seamlessly edited, and much more accessible to audiences. All the stuff there is to love about The Lord of the Rings  is there in the original versions, the plethora of new and extended scenes merely add to that for fans. And of those, they fall into three camps for me: 1....
1 comment
Read more

Back to the Feature: New York, New York (1977)

New York, New York  is a two hour forty minute musical movie largely about a toxic relationship and I understand why it was Martin Scorsese’s first big flop. Some have blamed its poor reception on the kind of movie it was, of a style and tone Scorsese wasn’t known for, but I find that hard to believe. Even after only five films, he’d proven himself an extremely versatile director, and Alice Doesn’t Live Here Anymore  found an audience. Sure this jazz musical love letter to New York City was following up Taxi Driver and its’ far more cynical take on the city, but then it’s also ‘from the director of Taxi Driver ’ which itself was a big hit. Was it a matter of public appetite for musicals, or mere word of mouth and early critical reception that dissuaded viewers? Irrespective of that, I was stunned to discover this movie was the origin of the titular song, which I’d assumed was much older (it’s definitely got the sound of something that might have come out of the Jazz sce...
Post a Comment
Read more