Skip to main content

A Hellish Reboot (Yes It’s Too Easy But I Tried Harder Than This Movie)


Guillermo del Toro really wanted to make Hellboy 3; an end to his planned trilogy of films based off of the popular Dark Horse comic series by Mike Mignola. His fans wanted that too, as his two Hellboy movies were quite distinct from most of their genre contemporaries: a mix of superhero film with elements of gothic fiction and creature features presented in a fun and charismatic way with a cast of lesser-name actors playing their parts with the utmost dedication. But that sequel fell apart for a number of reasons (mostly del Toro’s budget conditions), so instead, we have a Hellboy reboot directed by Neil Marshall, admittedly one of the best directors from Game of Thrones. However his skills wouldn’t be apparent from this movie alone, which isn’t just horribly told and excruciatingly excessive, but mind-bogglingly incompetent.
After the completely inconsequential death of his former partner, Hellboy (David Harbour), demon agent of the Bureau for Paranormal Research and Defence is sent by his adopted father Trevor Bruttenholm (Ian McShane) to England to aid their British counterpart the Osiris Club. While there however, Hellboy learns of a grand conspiracy by supernatural monsters to resurrect a powerful Arthurian witch Nimue (Milla Jovovich) who would bring about the apocalypse.
The pacing of this movie is horrendous, so many beats are rushed, unfocussed, and sloppy that they’re jarring to watch. Every exposition scene is hurrying along to the next action sequence when they’re not trying in vain to be both. That happens a lot in this movie: characters dispensing important (or often insignificant lore-based) information while some major action or violent set-piece is occurring, to the degree that one character exposits as they’re literally decomposing. None of this is helped by an awful script and atrocious editing that leaves the film feeling fragmented and incoherent. On top of it all the movie has a serious tone problem, shifting between ham-fisted violent imagery, comic relief, pseudo-serious drama, and even in one instance a sudden bizarre homage to campy 1940s film serials in which Thomas Haden Church makes a bewilderingly nonsensical cameo as some kind of G.I.Joe character. All of this, the severe pacing, editing, dialogue, and tone are immediately apparent in the opening backstory sequence, which has to be one of the worst of its kind I’ve ever seen!
This sequence also establishes from the start that Hellboy is an immensely stupid movie, not only in its story, which is dull clichéd, pedantic, and reliant on borrowing plot points from del Toro’s movies without any understanding of how to pull them off; but in how much it caters and panders to adolescent sensibilities of violence. In an effort to constantly remind the audience of its R-rating, the movie features quite a bit of ludicrous gore –and not the kind of uncomfortable gore you’d find in horror movies, but just exploitative graphic effects: people being torn in half by demons, a man getting his jaw ripped off, multiple impalements, etc. There’s no purpose for any of these beyond the sheer gimmick of their presence –it’s exactly what we were afraid Deadpool and Logan would be! Additionally, the film basks in its demonic content and imagery, as though it needs to exclaim loudly and often how metal it is. Occasionally there’s an interesting graphic design that kind of works, like the hag character Baba Yaga (until the filmmakers decide to go for pure gross-out effect with her) and her Howl’s Moving Castle home –a sequence which also features a set-piece that appears to be an ironic homage to Pan’s Labyrinth.
And then there’s the cast. David Harbour already had a hell of a job filling the shoes of Ron Perlman, but his dialogue and make-up don’t do him any favours. He sounds so awkward and uncomfortable saying a lot of these lines, and the make-up seems to really inhibit his expressiveness. The characters’ personality doesn’t extend beyond one-liners either, all the more reminding you how much more relatively rounded Perlmans’ interpretation was, who was tough and sardonic yes, but also an awkward misfit. This movie doesn’t seem to be aware either that “Hellboy” is kind of a silly name, and that there was a reason in del Toro’s movies most of his friends and acquaintances instead called him “Red”. Ian McShane is one of the more tolerable elements, but even he can’t compare to his predecessor, the late great John Hurt. The relationship between him and Hellboy is much more abrasive in this movie too, and though it’s not inherently a bad idea, it makes investing in either of them much more difficult. Sasha Lane and Daniel Dae Kim are also in this film, both affecting unconvincing English accents (Lane in particular is fed a lot of stereotype British phrases, shining a spotlight on her disingenuousness). And Jovovich over-acts her thin villain, but never quite to the degree of being an enjoyable performance –there’s still too little substance there.
Hellboy makes all the same mistakes as 2017’s The Mummy, but somehow manages to be even worse; and just like The Mummy, it makes its previous incarnation look like a masterpiece by comparison. This movie is so slipshod and idiotic that it literally gave me a headache. If you can, re-watch del Toro’s movies for your Hellboy fixation, and pray to the Devil the sequel this film sets up never happens.

Follow me on Twitter: https://twitter.com/Jordan_D_Bosch

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Strange History of the American Spoof Movie

Parody movies have been around for a lot longer than we tend to think of them. Even from the earliest days of Hollywood there were movies meant to satirize a particular subject or genre. In the silent era, Buster Keaton was responsible for a few. And in the early sound era, almost as soon as the monster pictures took off did you see comic versions of them -Abbott and Costello hosting a few. But parody movies tended to be subtle for most of cinema history, or parody came in conjunction with another goal of the comedy. It really wasn’t until the 1980s and 90s that it took off and became popularly understood. And there is perhaps a line to be drawn to the counterculture comedy explosion that began in the 1970s through avenues like  Saturday Night Live , which frequently parodied from even its earliest years popular movies and cultural properties of the time. But that is still a way’s back. To my generation though, ‘parody movie’ is perhaps a less known term than the more blunt ‘s...

Notes on the Title Cards of The Lord of the Rings

It might be sacrilege for one who both considers The Lord of the Rings  trilogy to be one of the greatest triumphs of cinema and has been an avid lover of the films since adolescence, to declare that the original theatrical cuts of the films are better than the much beloved extended editions. Easily it’s my most controversial opinion regarding these movies. Don’t get me wrong, I do like the extended editions quite a lot, especially as someone who just enjoys spending time in that universe. They flesh it out more, add extra flavour, and in increasing the length by about an hour really emphasize the epic quality of these films. But I find that the original cuts are generally more cleanly paced, more seamlessly edited, and much more accessible to audiences. All the stuff there is to love about The Lord of the Rings  is there in the original versions, the plethora of new and extended scenes merely add to that for fans. And of those, they fall into three camps for me: 1....

Back to the Feature: New York, New York (1977)

New York, New York  is a two hour forty minute musical movie largely about a toxic relationship and I understand why it was Martin Scorsese’s first big flop. Some have blamed its poor reception on the kind of movie it was, of a style and tone Scorsese wasn’t known for, but I find that hard to believe. Even after only five films, he’d proven himself an extremely versatile director, and Alice Doesn’t Live Here Anymore  found an audience. Sure this jazz musical love letter to New York City was following up Taxi Driver and its’ far more cynical take on the city, but then it’s also ‘from the director of Taxi Driver ’ which itself was a big hit. Was it a matter of public appetite for musicals, or mere word of mouth and early critical reception that dissuaded viewers? Irrespective of that, I was stunned to discover this movie was the origin of the titular song, which I’d assumed was much older (it’s definitely got the sound of something that might have come out of the Jazz sce...