Skip to main content

Nicole Kidman Destroys


A plot synopsis of Destroyer, the new film from Girlfight and Æon Flux director Karyn Kusama, reads like an extremely typical gritty cop movie. And while it does concede to a number of plot and character clichés, Destroyer is certainly not typical. While it isn’t exactly unique in its story, it is thoroughly engaging in its style and direction, but most importantly in its ambiguously moral and damaged lead character.
Again, this isn’t indicative of the movies’ presentation, but Erin Bell (Nicole Kidman) is an extremely unorthodox LAPD officer who takes it upon herself to track down Silas (Toby Kebbell), a gang leader and bank robber whose organization she and her then partner Chris (Sebastian Stan) infiltrated nearly twenty years earlier. As she ruthlessly tries to ascertain his whereabouts and reflects on her time in his crew she also must deal with her estranged daughter Shelby (Jade Pettyjohn) who’s making increasingly dangerous and self-destructive choices. 
Nicole Kidmans’ performance is arresting, invigorating, and terrifying. In her appearance alone she’s been stripped of all conventional artifice and made dirty and crude with heavy creases under her eyes, thin, greasy hair and bangs, and a sickly paleness to her complexion. She wouldn’t be out of place in a movie like Monster or The Revenant. But her character is also ceaselessly interesting, an anti-hero of a different calibre even in a genre known for them. While her intent is to thwart a dangerous criminal, she’s acting purely out of a vendetta, and the means she goes to to get information become increasingly more severe as the movie unfolds. We see too that her personal life is a shambles, that she’s lost all of her daughters’ respect and trust, the entirety of their relationship indicating she’d been a bad mother.
Erin regrets all of this, but also seems to know it’s too late for her to turn around, and as such is unafraid to resort to beating up a slimy lawyer (Bradley Whitford) or kidnapping Silas’ girlfriend (Tatiana Maslany). She’s not a bad cop in the way Riggs is a “bad cop”, she’s a bad cop in that she’s far too violent and unstable to be on the police force. In foiling a bank robbery, her carefree shooting is certainly liable to harm an innocent person, driven as she is to kill her target. She may be on the side of good but she is only the shell of a good person. Yet you understand all the pain that’s led her to this point even before the full details of its inception are shown. Kidman brilliantly brings this character to life in the best of a string of great performances she gave in 2018; and particularly in one scene with her daughter at a diner late in the film -which forces if not a re-evaluation than a re-contextualization of her character- and the subsequent ending, earns the Oscar nomination she didn’t receive.
The film weaves the story of her infiltration alongside the current plot in which we get a better idea of the nature of Silas’ outfit. Here we see the den the gang inhabit in squalor fit for Trainspotting, as well as Silas’ manipulative nature when he goads one underling (Zach Villa) into Russian roulette. Even though the end result of that original operation is clear in the current timeline, it unfolds pretty well and provides an origin for both Erin’s amoral trajectory and her mission in this story. Her time there is what made her. Toby Kebbell’s an often underrated actor due to appearing in movies like Fantastic Four, Warcraft, Ben-Hur, and The Hurricane Heist, but here he makes for a decently threatening villain who can live up to the reputation the movie gives him. Sebastian Stan and Tatiana Maslany are unsurprisingly really good as well, and Jade Pettyjohn really sells the disgruntled teenager taking joy in how much her mother hates her horrible older boyfriend (Beau Knapp).
Kusama directs with as brutal and dirty an aesthetic as Erin herself. The film is very muted and never really strays from its gritty tone, the colourlessness filling out the drab world and emphasizing its degradation. The intensity doesn’t wane and through every story beat, derivative though they may be, your investment is held. Because the shattering subversive nature of Destroyer keeps you on your toes for an unconventional resolution -and this is true. The film takes on new meaning at the diner scene, which transforms it into something more soulful, and everything that follows has a solemn tragedy to it that’s as unexpected as any plot twist.
It goes without saying this is one of Nicole Kidmans’ best performances; and also that that character compellingly written by Phil Hay and Matt Manfredi, skilfully directed by Kusama is what carries Destroyer and allows it to leave an impact many other crime dramas otherwise like it would not.

Follow me on Twitter: https://twitter.com/Jordan_D_Bosch

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Strange History of the American Spoof Movie

Parody movies have been around for a lot longer than we tend to think of them. Even from the earliest days of Hollywood there were movies meant to satirize a particular subject or genre. In the silent era, Buster Keaton was responsible for a few. And in the early sound era, almost as soon as the monster pictures took off did you see comic versions of them -Abbott and Costello hosting a few. But parody movies tended to be subtle for most of cinema history, or parody came in conjunction with another goal of the comedy. It really wasn’t until the 1980s and 90s that it took off and became popularly understood. And there is perhaps a line to be drawn to the counterculture comedy explosion that began in the 1970s through avenues like  Saturday Night Live , which frequently parodied from even its earliest years popular movies and cultural properties of the time. But that is still a way’s back. To my generation though, ‘parody movie’ is perhaps a less known term than the more blunt ‘s...

Notes on the Title Cards of The Lord of the Rings

It might be sacrilege for one who both considers The Lord of the Rings  trilogy to be one of the greatest triumphs of cinema and has been an avid lover of the films since adolescence, to declare that the original theatrical cuts of the films are better than the much beloved extended editions. Easily it’s my most controversial opinion regarding these movies. Don’t get me wrong, I do like the extended editions quite a lot, especially as someone who just enjoys spending time in that universe. They flesh it out more, add extra flavour, and in increasing the length by about an hour really emphasize the epic quality of these films. But I find that the original cuts are generally more cleanly paced, more seamlessly edited, and much more accessible to audiences. All the stuff there is to love about The Lord of the Rings  is there in the original versions, the plethora of new and extended scenes merely add to that for fans. And of those, they fall into three camps for me: 1....

Back to the Feature: New York, New York (1977)

New York, New York  is a two hour forty minute musical movie largely about a toxic relationship and I understand why it was Martin Scorsese’s first big flop. Some have blamed its poor reception on the kind of movie it was, of a style and tone Scorsese wasn’t known for, but I find that hard to believe. Even after only five films, he’d proven himself an extremely versatile director, and Alice Doesn’t Live Here Anymore  found an audience. Sure this jazz musical love letter to New York City was following up Taxi Driver and its’ far more cynical take on the city, but then it’s also ‘from the director of Taxi Driver ’ which itself was a big hit. Was it a matter of public appetite for musicals, or mere word of mouth and early critical reception that dissuaded viewers? Irrespective of that, I was stunned to discover this movie was the origin of the titular song, which I’d assumed was much older (it’s definitely got the sound of something that might have come out of the Jazz sce...