Skip to main content

Dick


Vice is a really unpleasant film. That’s the intent to some degree of course, but it doesn’t make it any more fulfilling to sit through. The movie is over two hours of a man reminding us how awful the Bush administration was and more specifically how bad a person Dick Cheney is. Adam McKay clearly wanted to make this movie for a long time, his mixture of hatred of and fascination with the former U.S. Vice President boiling over as though it had forcibly been repressed in the decade since he left office. But now McKay has let all of it out, venting, educating (I’m sure he believes), and breaking down the minutia of what made Cheney such a terrible and powerful political figure in admittedly creative and sometimes impressive ways. But there’s no constructive reason for this, there’s nothing meaningful McKay ultimately has to say with this satirical biopic.
Told from the point-of-view of an Iraq war veteran (Jesse Plemons), the film chronicles the trajectory of the career of Dick Cheney (Christian Bale) from a Yale drop-out Wyoming lineman to working in the Nixon administration under Donald Rumsfeld (Steve Carrell) through his term as Secretary of Defence during the first Bush administration and finally becoming George W. Bush’s (Sam Rockwell) running mate and manipulating the foreign and domestic policy of the United States during the second Bush administration.
Like McKay’s last film The Big Short, Vice operates under the presumption that its audience doesn’t know anything about its subject matter. But while The Big Short was dealing in the intricacies of the housing crisis, Vice is about much more common knowledge history and politics; yet it still condescends to its audience, especially millennials and working class Americans who it paints in broad stereotypes on the occasions they appear. The manner in which the movie talks down to you and takes glee in spelling out the political corruption taking place, it feels as though McKay is pointing the finger at his American audience, while smugly basking in his own observations and research. There’s emphasis placed on scenes where focus groups are falling for doctored terminology, or how Cheney and others confidently get away with things in the knowledge that average Americans won’t care about boring bureaucratic details that enable abuses of power. And often these are brought into contrast with brief yet brutal scenes depicting resulting atrocities. Rumsfeld gloating about Americas’ global power is cut against the bombing of a harmless Vietnamese village; Cheney reconstructing the government definition of torture is presented alongside terrified Muslims being waterboarded. Eisenstein himself couldn’t have edited it better. Obviously the goal with such technique is to present these characters in the worst light possible, and while it’s aggravating, it’s not entirely for the reason the film intends. Because of the comedic lens which halfway normalizes these interactions and the air of superiority, you’re more angry with the filmmakers than with the politicians. Way more people than McKay thinks knows what happened during those governments -even when in office, Cheney was never a beloved figure. This is just preaching.
The text of this film is so spiteful that it overshadows the genuinely interesting and original stuff in it. Some of the presentation gags like Cheney elaborately proposing an obscene display as a showcase of his skilful spin language or a false ending complete with a half minute of credits are decently entertaining touches. There’s even a bit where Dick and Lynn Cheney (Amy Adams) have a Shakespearean conversation completely in verse that’s very evocative of Richard III, and a scene late in the movie where Cheney breaks the fourth wall that’s even more so. But these comedic flourishings could just as easily be too clumsy and lazy, such as the appearance of a drunk and disorderly George W. Bush at his fathers’ gala in the early ‘90s, or Cheney’s heart following his transplant in 2012 being visibly black.
Vice boasts a talented cast however, and I can’t say Christian Bale’s performance isn’t good. It’s not just the incredible make-up and prosthetics, he replicates Cheney’s mannerisms and voice quite well in a way that’s only halfway to parody, which is about right for this movie. His Big Short co-star Steve Carrell seems to be enjoying playing the amoral and slimy Rumsfeld after recent heavier roles like in Beautiful Boy and Last Flag Flying. Amy Adams does well as the ambitious Lynn, with Alison Pill and Lily Rabe as Mary and Liz, the formers’ homosexuality forming a not insignificant subplot. Sam Rockwell manages to be mildly entertaining as W, but rarely rises above a caricature. The cast also includes Tyler Perry as Colin Powell, Justin Kirk as Scooter Libby, LisaGay Hamilton as Condoleeza Rice, Eddie Marsan as Paul Wolfowitz, Shea Whigam as Lynn’s father, and an Alfred Molina cameo in what might be the movies’ funniest moment.
For a film about Dick Cheney, Vice is not at all interested in any nuances about its title character, which is why the story is told by a third party. This makes for a film that feels very inhuman, which again is kind of what it’s going for, but it achieves this largely in a roundabout obnoxious way. The political landscape of America right now is chaotic, and the last thing a lot of Americans need is a depressing reminder of the seemingly inescapable pattern of hateful politicians achieving undeserved power and mocking the people with it. They deserve even less a movie that does the same thing.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Strange History of the American Spoof Movie

Parody movies have been around for a lot longer than we tend to think of them. Even from the earliest days of Hollywood there were movies meant to satirize a particular subject or genre. In the silent era, Buster Keaton was responsible for a few. And in the early sound era, almost as soon as the monster pictures took off did you see comic versions of them -Abbott and Costello hosting a few. But parody movies tended to be subtle for most of cinema history, or parody came in conjunction with another goal of the comedy. It really wasn’t until the 1980s and 90s that it took off and became popularly understood. And there is perhaps a line to be drawn to the counterculture comedy explosion that began in the 1970s through avenues like  Saturday Night Live , which frequently parodied from even its earliest years popular movies and cultural properties of the time. But that is still a way’s back. To my generation though, ‘parody movie’ is perhaps a less known term than the more blunt ‘s...

Notes on the Title Cards of The Lord of the Rings

It might be sacrilege for one who both considers The Lord of the Rings  trilogy to be one of the greatest triumphs of cinema and has been an avid lover of the films since adolescence, to declare that the original theatrical cuts of the films are better than the much beloved extended editions. Easily it’s my most controversial opinion regarding these movies. Don’t get me wrong, I do like the extended editions quite a lot, especially as someone who just enjoys spending time in that universe. They flesh it out more, add extra flavour, and in increasing the length by about an hour really emphasize the epic quality of these films. But I find that the original cuts are generally more cleanly paced, more seamlessly edited, and much more accessible to audiences. All the stuff there is to love about The Lord of the Rings  is there in the original versions, the plethora of new and extended scenes merely add to that for fans. And of those, they fall into three camps for me: 1....

Back to the Feature: New York, New York (1977)

New York, New York  is a two hour forty minute musical movie largely about a toxic relationship and I understand why it was Martin Scorsese’s first big flop. Some have blamed its poor reception on the kind of movie it was, of a style and tone Scorsese wasn’t known for, but I find that hard to believe. Even after only five films, he’d proven himself an extremely versatile director, and Alice Doesn’t Live Here Anymore  found an audience. Sure this jazz musical love letter to New York City was following up Taxi Driver and its’ far more cynical take on the city, but then it’s also ‘from the director of Taxi Driver ’ which itself was a big hit. Was it a matter of public appetite for musicals, or mere word of mouth and early critical reception that dissuaded viewers? Irrespective of that, I was stunned to discover this movie was the origin of the titular song, which I’d assumed was much older (it’s definitely got the sound of something that might have come out of the Jazz sce...