Skip to main content

A Most Favourable Film


Queen Anne sat on the throne of England from 1702 to 1714. Her reign most notably saw the Acts of Union that formed Great Britain and the end of the War of the Spanish Succession. She suffered numerous miscarriages before her husband died in 1708 and six years later she passed with no direct heir, resulting in the end of the House of Stuart and the succession of the German Hanoverians.
She is not one of the popular British monarchs but is an important figure nonetheless and her life was characterized by a lot of sadness and tragedy. It’s this that Greek filmmaker Yorgos Lanthimos wanted to explore in his dark comedy The Favourite, set near the end of Anne’s reign and depicting the rivalry between two women vying to be her court favourite with all the political power it entails.
Depressed and in poor health due to gout, Queen Anne (Olivia Colman) leaves the running of the kingdom more or less in the hands of her court favourite advisor and confidante Sarah Churchill Lady Marlborough (Rachel Weisz). But when Sarah’s cousin Abigail Hill (Emma Stone) arrives at court for employment, her family having lost most of its wealth, Sarah faces unlikely competition as Abigail begins to earn the Queens’ favour through flattery and kindness in opposition to Sarah’s brash honesty and intellect.
The script by Deborah Davis and Tony McNamara is packed full of really sharp wit, sarcasm, and a delightful strain of passive aggression in the dialogue that’s a lot of fun to experience. Incorporated into the posh style of diction spoken by the characters, it’s wonderfully smart and biting, at times reminding me of the brilliant writing of Blackadder. It makes the characters feel alive and fresh, which is an especially strong asset when none of them are particularly likeable. The power plays have a real energy to them and a relative frankness that doesn’t betray the tone set by the films’ mocking view of the early eighteenth century.
Working magic with the material is a trio of lead actresses each giving an utterly marvellous performance that commands your attention. Approvingly top billed and most important is Olivia Colman as a heartbreaking and bewildering Anne. Colman has been one of Britain’s best actresses for years now as anyone who’s seen Broadchurch, The Night Manager, Tyrannosaur, or even Green Wing and Peep Show can attest, and it’s wonderful to see her finally getting the international acclaim she deserves. The misery of her character and consequent naïvety comes off very profoundly, so that though she’s eccentric, pettish, and unreasonable at times it’s understandable and sympathetic. There’s a wonderful scene, her first bonding with Abigail, that details how her rabbits are each named for one of the children she lost, and it’s made very clear how those traumas as well as the weight of being Queen and the knowledge that she’s the last of her line has resulted in her present behaviour and attitude. Colman flawlessly shines in Anne’s joy, rage, and sorrow, making her the only character you truly care about.
Emma Stone is fantastic and more conniving than I’ve ever seen her as the film follows Abigail’s rise in status. She’s the Becky Sharp of the movie, and plays the part of the scheming upstart incredibly well. Yet it’s a dynamic performance too, and Stone very much seems to relish playing both the genuine-turned-masquerading innocence and cunningly manipulative nature of Abigail. Rachel Weisz is a perfect envious bitch, whose casual cruel remarks to Anne are ultimately what threaten her favour. She has an aura of power about her from the very start and is exceptionally clever, which Weisz plays with unwavering confidence. She boasts some of the movies’ greatest lines, keeping her brilliant wit even late in the film once her fortunes are falling. It’s still perhaps not as strong as Weisz’s performance is Disobedience but it is striking. Nicholas Hoult heads up the supporting cast as the charismatic bastard of an Opposition Leader Robert Harley, while Joe Alwyn plays Samuel Marsham, a git who’s attracted to Abigail, but has his advances spurned by her in increasingly comical ways. Additionally, James Smith plays Sidney Godolphin and Mark Gatiss plays Sarah’s husband and general the Duke of Marlborough. These men though are fairly useless on their own, this is a movie that delights in the women holding the power.
To convey the movies’ unusual look and feel to evoke a kind of ironically dark and dramatic scale, Lanthimos makes a number of particular stylistic choices. The story is broken up into chapters, each named for a subtly significant quote contained therein, and throughout the film there’s a grand classical score that undercuts otherwise monotonous scenes or single shots. These include excerpts of Bach, Handel, and Vivaldi and their use is very reminiscent of Kubrick. There’s a Peter Greenaway influence in the production design, tone, and editing, as well as how the backgrounds stand out against the actors, and a few sequences emphasizing the ludicrous ugly men have a definite Dreyer feel. Most notably though is the frequent use of fisheye lenses and fluid wide shots in the cinematography that keeps the world of the film off-kilter and creates a sense of space and greater isolation.
Quite possibly the greatest comedy of the year, The Favourite is an inventive, shrewd, and unconventional movie about a compelling feud of loyalty, love, and power. It’s got an Oscar-worthy screenplay, and Colman, Stone, and Weisz are each indomitable as three of the most engaging female characters ever to grace a period movie. Queen Anne has gotten a worthy film and it lives up to its title as a definitive favourite of 2018!

Follow me on Twitter: https://twitter.com/Jordan_D_Bosch

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Strange History of the American Spoof Movie

Parody movies have been around for a lot longer than we tend to think of them. Even from the earliest days of Hollywood there were movies meant to satirize a particular subject or genre. In the silent era, Buster Keaton was responsible for a few. And in the early sound era, almost as soon as the monster pictures took off did you see comic versions of them -Abbott and Costello hosting a few. But parody movies tended to be subtle for most of cinema history, or parody came in conjunction with another goal of the comedy. It really wasn’t until the 1980s and 90s that it took off and became popularly understood. And there is perhaps a line to be drawn to the counterculture comedy explosion that began in the 1970s through avenues like  Saturday Night Live , which frequently parodied from even its earliest years popular movies and cultural properties of the time. But that is still a way’s back. To my generation though, ‘parody movie’ is perhaps a less known term than the more blunt ‘s...

Notes on the Title Cards of The Lord of the Rings

It might be sacrilege for one who both considers The Lord of the Rings  trilogy to be one of the greatest triumphs of cinema and has been an avid lover of the films since adolescence, to declare that the original theatrical cuts of the films are better than the much beloved extended editions. Easily it’s my most controversial opinion regarding these movies. Don’t get me wrong, I do like the extended editions quite a lot, especially as someone who just enjoys spending time in that universe. They flesh it out more, add extra flavour, and in increasing the length by about an hour really emphasize the epic quality of these films. But I find that the original cuts are generally more cleanly paced, more seamlessly edited, and much more accessible to audiences. All the stuff there is to love about The Lord of the Rings  is there in the original versions, the plethora of new and extended scenes merely add to that for fans. And of those, they fall into three camps for me: 1....

Back to the Feature: New York, New York (1977)

New York, New York  is a two hour forty minute musical movie largely about a toxic relationship and I understand why it was Martin Scorsese’s first big flop. Some have blamed its poor reception on the kind of movie it was, of a style and tone Scorsese wasn’t known for, but I find that hard to believe. Even after only five films, he’d proven himself an extremely versatile director, and Alice Doesn’t Live Here Anymore  found an audience. Sure this jazz musical love letter to New York City was following up Taxi Driver and its’ far more cynical take on the city, but then it’s also ‘from the director of Taxi Driver ’ which itself was a big hit. Was it a matter of public appetite for musicals, or mere word of mouth and early critical reception that dissuaded viewers? Irrespective of that, I was stunned to discover this movie was the origin of the titular song, which I’d assumed was much older (it’s definitely got the sound of something that might have come out of the Jazz sce...