Skip to main content

Jonah Hill Reflects on the ‘90s With Style if not Strength


A lot of actors have been making the leap to director lately. Bo Burnham and Bradley Cooper have made their quite impressive directorial debuts already this year, and now Jonah Hill joins the throng with his reflective interpretation of a certain kind of childhood experience in Los Angeles in the mid ‘90s. Mid90s is the name of this film in fact, and Hill clearly put a lot of effort into its look and feel, though I wish he put more into making it an enjoyable experience.
Stevie (Sunny Suljic) is a kid growing up in Los Angeles with his single mother (Katherine Waterston) and bullying older brother Ian (Lucas Hedges). When he discovers a skateboarding shop seemingly run by a quartet of teenage troublemakers, he slowly works his way into joining their gang, idolizing their carefree daredevilry and anti-authoritarian attitudes.
Hill really commits to his aesthetic for this movie. If the film wasn’t actually shot on an old video camera, he goes the extra mile to make it look like it was. There’s a grainy, grimy look to the film that characterized most home videos made during that era, the colours are often desaturated and toned down, the lighting at times is almost certainly natural, and the aspect ratio is reduced to 4:3 for the entire runtime. Just as much detail goes into the fundamentally 90’s hairstyles, fashion trends and skater culture that dominated the California youth scene in the age of Tony Hawk. Yet the movie is smart enough not to just coast on nostalgic iconography. There are definitely instances of it, especially early on with Ninja Turtles bedsheets, Sunny-D, and Super Nintendo making appearances, but it’s focus is more on a specific character journey with the mid ‘90s as a mere backdrop.
The writing is also generally pretty good and authentic. There’s a very natural pace and cadence to the dialogue that is almost reminiscent of Richard Linklater, with the distinct style already making me think of Slacker by way of The 400 Blows. The movie also doesn’t hold back on the language of its adolescent characters, and I don’t mean just by letting them swear regularly. The casual sexism, homophobia, and racism of youth at the time is on full display in these boys. It’s possible this may have been a tad too far in the vein of realism though, because it’s one of the contributing factors to the characters not being very likeable and the story on a whole lacking resonance.
Sunny Suljic gives it his all, but for most of this movies runtime I hated Stevie, nicknamed “Sunburn” by his skater friends. And that’s not entirely unintentional -at a point he’s clearly not meant to be a good kid, but the whole trajectory of his arc in the film is inherently unlikeable. He’s about twelve years old and unsatisfied with his life, so he easily falls in with a troupe of bad influences. You can make out something of what Hill is going for in this, potentially a commentary on peer pressure and youth psychology; but the movie spends a lot of time with this quintet of hooligans making bad decisions, Stevie chief among them, and it isn’t pleasant to watch. There are uncomfortable sequences, one in particular between Stevie and a girl at least five years older than him that you feel uneasy watching. And I could abide stuff like this if there were a point, but there really doesn’t seem to be one. Stevie’s story doesn’t quite have a resolution and none of the skaters learn a lesson, even after multiple close calls. The closest to a likeable figure in the bunch is the de-facto leader Ray (Na-kel Smith), wise enough to want to get out of his stagnancy and who tries to impress on Stevie the importance of appreciating what he’s got, especially next to the fractured, impoverished backgrounds of the rest of the gang.
 Stevie’s home-life is indeed not ideal, but he is still comparatively privileged. There’s a heavy implication that his mother is a sex worker, but this has no bearing on her caring demeanour and deep concern for his safety. The only evidence of family misfortune is his asshole of a brother, who belittles, mocks, and beats on him. Speaking as one, older brothers are assholes, and Ian’s not far removed from countless other mean and insecure teenagers, especially for that time. Lucas Hedges, as usual, is really great by the way and the best actor in the movie -though Waterston’s a close second. What’s important is there’s not a strong enough reason to compel Stevie into his destructive attitude and choices, and his coming-of-age is characterized by a rejection of learning from mistakes.
I think the intent of Hill with Mid90s was to offer a modern Californian answer to The 400 Blows (I would argue we already got that with Lady Bird). But he fails to make his lead character relatable in his miscreant actions or give him the endearing conscience that kept Antoine Doinel engaging. Still, Mid90s shouldn’t be dismissed outright and Hill certainly shows promise. I look forward to seeing his future projects behind the camera. He, like his protagonist, just needs to grow.

Follow me on Twitter: https://twitter.com/Jordan_D_Bosch 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Strange History of the American Spoof Movie

Parody movies have been around for a lot longer than we tend to think of them. Even from the earliest days of Hollywood there were movies meant to satirize a particular subject or genre. In the silent era, Buster Keaton was responsible for a few. And in the early sound era, almost as soon as the monster pictures took off did you see comic versions of them -Abbott and Costello hosting a few. But parody movies tended to be subtle for most of cinema history, or parody came in conjunction with another goal of the comedy. It really wasn’t until the 1980s and 90s that it took off and became popularly understood. And there is perhaps a line to be drawn to the counterculture comedy explosion that began in the 1970s through avenues like  Saturday Night Live , which frequently parodied from even its earliest years popular movies and cultural properties of the time. But that is still a way’s back. To my generation though, ‘parody movie’ is perhaps a less known term than the more blunt ‘s...

Notes on the Title Cards of The Lord of the Rings

It might be sacrilege for one who both considers The Lord of the Rings  trilogy to be one of the greatest triumphs of cinema and has been an avid lover of the films since adolescence, to declare that the original theatrical cuts of the films are better than the much beloved extended editions. Easily it’s my most controversial opinion regarding these movies. Don’t get me wrong, I do like the extended editions quite a lot, especially as someone who just enjoys spending time in that universe. They flesh it out more, add extra flavour, and in increasing the length by about an hour really emphasize the epic quality of these films. But I find that the original cuts are generally more cleanly paced, more seamlessly edited, and much more accessible to audiences. All the stuff there is to love about The Lord of the Rings  is there in the original versions, the plethora of new and extended scenes merely add to that for fans. And of those, they fall into three camps for me: 1....

Back to the Feature: New York, New York (1977)

New York, New York  is a two hour forty minute musical movie largely about a toxic relationship and I understand why it was Martin Scorsese’s first big flop. Some have blamed its poor reception on the kind of movie it was, of a style and tone Scorsese wasn’t known for, but I find that hard to believe. Even after only five films, he’d proven himself an extremely versatile director, and Alice Doesn’t Live Here Anymore  found an audience. Sure this jazz musical love letter to New York City was following up Taxi Driver and its’ far more cynical take on the city, but then it’s also ‘from the director of Taxi Driver ’ which itself was a big hit. Was it a matter of public appetite for musicals, or mere word of mouth and early critical reception that dissuaded viewers? Irrespective of that, I was stunned to discover this movie was the origin of the titular song, which I’d assumed was much older (it’s definitely got the sound of something that might have come out of the Jazz sce...