Skip to main content

Disney Gets Internet Access


For most of its history, sequels haven’t really been Disney’s thing -not high quality, theatrical animated canon ones at least. Ralph Breaks the Internet (which ought to be called Ralph Wrecks the Internet) is only their third after The Rescuers Down Under (the studio’s single most underrated gem) and Fantasia 2000 (which contains some of their best ever animation). The arcade game world and creative premise of Wreck-It Ralph actually did offer a lot of opportunity for a follow-up though, and I was really looking forward to what a sequel would do. Going to the internet wasn’t what I expected, but I remained optimistic even while the trailers for this movie were pretty insufferable, emphasizing mostly the shameless Disney Princess scene. Luckily, the movie is not as bad as the trailers, but it does have some bugs.
Craving something new from her game, Vanellope von Schweetz (Sarah Silverman) is delighted when Wreck-It Ralph (John C. Reilly) creates a new track for her. But a player, while manoeuvring it, accidentally breaks the games’ wheel control causing the game itself to be shut down and Vanellope rendered homeless. Hearing that they could find a replacement wheel online, Ralph and Vanellope journey into the arcades’ recently installed wifi and connect to the internet. While trying to make real money to buy the wheel, Vanellope becomes enamoured with a tough online racing game called Slaughter Race as Ralph’s insecurity threatens their friendship.
The problem with making a movie about the internet is that the internet is in a constant state of change. What was true about it when a movie enters production won’t necessarily be when it’s released, so the filmmakers have to keep their fingers on its pulse in order to satirize it effectively. But director Rich Moore is an inventive guy, and in a number of places lambastes the internet as much as he can under the Disney family friendly banner (which really isn’t a lot -the internet is definitely not a PG-rated place). There are some astute, creative, and funny observations and interpretations in this movie, such as a great animation gag involving online avatars, and a murky dark web where pop-up ads take you. However half the internet jokes aren’t very inspired and quite a few are downright outdated. It’s been almost a decade since jokes about cat videos have been funny or pertinent, yet here they are in this movie. Predictive text in search engines even is a bit old hand and the film doesn’t quite get how viral videos work. At times it’s very clear that this movie is being made by people who aren’t quite in tune with internet culture. It could have used some more millennials on its creative team. As far as imagination goes, the look and feel of the world of the internet is somewhat reminiscent of Futurama (on which Moore was a director), not quite as unique or well-realized as Moore’s worlds in Wreck-It Ralph or Zootopia.
The film immediately recaptures the endearing relationship between Ralph and Vanellope though, and Reilly and Silverman have terrific chemistry. The strength of their characters was the real key to what made the first movie so great and they have a lot of good moments here too. But while Vanellope’s arc is interesting and resonant, Ralph’s comes across almost a little regressive. It’s not a bad character direction per se, but it does feel a bit off for Ralph and allows for a couple really awful clichés to dampen the last act of the movie. Gal Gadot is a welcome addition as Shank, a Slaughter Race daredevil and inspirational figure for Vanellope. Taraji P. Henson voices Yesss, the personification of a social media algorithm, whose not nearly evil enough to come anywhere close to an accurate depiction. Alan Tudyk of course is here, as is a funny Bill Hader. But returning actors Jack McBrayer and Jane Lynch get very little to do, as Fix-It Felix and Sergeant Calhoun are confined to the wings of this movie. A subplot for them is even set up but never actually followed through and their parts are only barely more than cameos.
That brings me to the Princesses and the excessive Disney sequence, which is the most awkward part of the film. Even setting aside the fact the movie stops dead in its tracks to be a Disney ad and the blatant corporate manipulation, it’s not all that clever and mostly just exists to remind the audience how many properties Disney owns. As for the much promoted Princess gathering, it is nice for Disney fans to hear the likes of Jodi Benson voicing Ariel again and Paige O’Hara voicing Belle, alongside recent additions Idina Menzel, Kristen Bell, and Auli’i Cravalho (Kelly Macdonald of Brave gets one line that’s a lame joke, followed by a pretty good joke). But the subversive nature of their self-awareness itself feels outdated and disingenuous. Add to that a very out-of-place musical number written by Alan Menken that feels a little cheap for the sequel to a movie that was one of the least synergistic Disney movies in the companys’ history.
However, just like the first movie, Ralph Breaks the Internet conveys a unique but important message in an accessible way. The greatest asset at play is the films’ theme of friendship and specifically, respecting anothers’ autonomy. Ralph’s attachment to Vanellope is notably a little unhealthy, and it manifests in very potent ways throughout. Towards the end, the film touches on a very real aspect of a lot of friendships too and to its credit, sticks to its guns and goes through with an unconventional, even risky ending. It’s worth noting as well that this movie breaks with the Disney villain tradition, which is very refreshing and allows its theme an even greater impact.
Ralph Breaks the Internet can’t overcome its weaker story and humour elements as well as its predecessor, which is a modern Disney Classic; and the self-indulgent Disney sequence especially doesn’t work. But it does have a strong heart and conviction to it, and the characters generally still ring true. Ultimately it is fun, very nicely animated, and heartwarming. But I do wish its connection was a little stronger.

Follow me on Twitter: https://twitter.com/Jordan_D_Bosch
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Strange History of the American Spoof Movie

Parody movies have been around for a lot longer than we tend to think of them. Even from the earliest days of Hollywood there were movies meant to satirize a particular subject or genre. In the silent era, Buster Keaton was responsible for a few. And in the early sound era, almost as soon as the monster pictures took off did you see comic versions of them -Abbott and Costello hosting a few. But parody movies tended to be subtle for most of cinema history, or parody came in conjunction with another goal of the comedy. It really wasn’t until the 1980s and 90s that it took off and became popularly understood. And there is perhaps a line to be drawn to the counterculture comedy explosion that began in the 1970s through avenues like  Saturday Night Live , which frequently parodied from even its earliest years popular movies and cultural properties of the time. But that is still a way’s back. To my generation though, ‘parody movie’ is perhaps a less known term than the more blunt ‘s...
Post a Comment
Read more

Notes on the Title Cards of The Lord of the Rings

It might be sacrilege for one who both considers The Lord of the Rings  trilogy to be one of the greatest triumphs of cinema and has been an avid lover of the films since adolescence, to declare that the original theatrical cuts of the films are better than the much beloved extended editions. Easily it’s my most controversial opinion regarding these movies. Don’t get me wrong, I do like the extended editions quite a lot, especially as someone who just enjoys spending time in that universe. They flesh it out more, add extra flavour, and in increasing the length by about an hour really emphasize the epic quality of these films. But I find that the original cuts are generally more cleanly paced, more seamlessly edited, and much more accessible to audiences. All the stuff there is to love about The Lord of the Rings  is there in the original versions, the plethora of new and extended scenes merely add to that for fans. And of those, they fall into three camps for me: 1....
1 comment
Read more

A Stylish and Charmingly Reinvented David Copperfield

The Personal History, Adventures, Experience and Observation of David Copperfield the Younger of Blunderstone Rookery (Which He Never Meant to Publish on Any Account)  is the most important book Charles Dickens ever wrote. It is not the most famous or influential by any means (that would of course be A Christmas Carol ), but it is the book that is the purest expression of the authors’ style, identity, and worldview. It is his most personal work, semi-autobiographical in its story of the chronology from infancy to adulthood of a character who overcomes great loss and hardships to find a fulfilling life as a writer. To read David Copperfield  is to understand Dickens himself. Armando Iannucci knew this when he decided to make a new adaptation of the novel for a twenty-first century audience. He also knew that Dickens adaptations are ubiquitous at this point. Films are a bit rarer, but every few years a new television adaptation rears its head to keep the authors’ unique world an...
Post a Comment
Read more