Skip to main content

Come for the Character, Stay for the Chaos


There’s a lot of character and a lot of mystique to Drew Goddard’s slick and stylish neo-noir, Bad Times at the El Royale. A 70’s-set ensemble crime film, it’s got a lot of the same cleverness to it as Goddard’s previous directorial effort, Cabin in the Woods, missing only the flourish and wit of a Joss Whedon script. But Goddard’s an accomplished screenwriter himself, and though clearly a better writer of plot than character, still manages to craft a mostly intriguing, intense, and fun thriller.
Four strangers: a soul singer (Cynthia Erivo), an old priest (Jeff Bridges), a vacuum cleaner salesman (Jon Hamm), and an abrasive young hippie (Dakota Johnson) check into the El Royale, a once luxurious hotel built on the border of California and Nevada, which has fallen into disrepair. Its’ sole employee is a nervous young clerk (Lewis Pullman) who checks them into their rooms. But each guest is hiding something, and as secrets unravel and stakes escalate it becomes a question of who will be able to survive their night at this shady old lodge.
This movies’ visual language is spectacular. It utilizes circular pans, tracking shots, and long takes really smartly, emphasizing a foreboding mood, suspense, and even a mysterious terror. The film is also meticulously edited. There’s a lot of music in this movie, mostly soul, R&B, and a little rock, and the cutting often accommodates the music to near Baby Driver levels of rhythmic cohesion, especially in the opening scene. The lighting and colour scheme, informed by time sensitive kitschy interior design patterns and bright neon signs outside lends a vibrant look to the El Royale, which is itself a seedy, enigmatic character and den of corruption and crime. And the films’ concession to images conveying something more than dialogue in multiple sequences is a good use of the medium.
However, Goddard’s script is still really solid, for the most part. The story is structured very interestingly, broken up by episodes honing in on a particular character at a time, revealing their history, and setting up their role in the larger narrative. Through this, the movie’s also able to show multiple actions and revelations from different perspectives, throwing in an implicit red herring or two along the way. Much like Cabin in the Woods, this film is constantly out to surprise you, and though its twists aren’t nearly as radical as in that film, they’re still plenty effective. It builds tension with the skill of a Hitchcock movie, and its’ presentation and artistic choices keep you firmly invested.
That’s not entirely true of the characters, who are very sharply written, but some of them lack satisfying development. There’s backstory, intrigue, and build-up for a few that ultimately goes nowhere. The actors are all good though. Jeff Bridges and Jon Hamm bring their usual level of dedication to their roles, Dakota Johnson succeeds at being genuinely intimidating (the Fifty Shades movies should not be held against her), as does Chris Hemsworth, who shows up later in the film as a dangerously sadistic cultist. Newcomers Lewis Pullman and Cailee Spaeney are really good respectfully as the fearful, damaged young employee and a vacant, warped young woman connected to Johnson’s character. But the stand-out is Cynthia Erivo, and not just for her superb singing voice which underscores a number of important scenes. There’s little artifice to her character, yet Erivo keeps her relatable, sensitive, and bold. Nick Offerman appears in a minor albeit important role and Canadian director Xavier Dolan makes a cameo appearance, as does Shea Whigham and The Good Place’s Manny Jacinto as a thug.
However the movie does have pacing and story issues. The near two and a half hour runtime doesn’t bother me as much as the last act feeling inordinately rushed (particularly near the end where it feels like it’s on a tight schedule not to overtake one-hundred forty minutes) and loses focus of some of the more interesting elements of the plot. One of the character backstories comes in here and interrupts the flow of the action drastically, while three of the other characters, their compelling history and relationships, are left insufficiently explored. The climax is still well-shot, performed and edited, but it can’t help feel a little careless. And the movie ends without all of its questions answered, some of which should remain unresolved, but others definitely warranted more explanation.
Bad Times at the El Royale has a brilliant set-up, clever and engrossing enough that its merely competent pay-off is disappointing. However it is coloured by strong performances, superb dialogue and plotting, excellent visual and technical prowess, a darkly comic tone, and a brazenly fun narrative style that make it just the right kind of 70’s themed pulp it aspires to be.

Follow me on Twitter: https://twitter.com/Jordan_D_Bosch 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Disney's Mulan, Cultural Appropriation, and Exploitation

I’m late on this one I know. I wasn’t willing to spend thirty bucks back in September for a movie experience I knew was going to be far poorer than if I had paid half that at a theatre. So I waited for it to hit streaming for free to give it a shot. In the meantime I heard that it wasn’t very good, but I remained determined not to skip it entirely, partly out of sympathy for director Niki Caro and partly out of morbid curiosity. Disney’s live-action Mulan  I was actually mildly looking forward to early in the year in spite of my well-documented distaste for this series of creative dead zones by the most powerful media conglomerate on earth. Mulan  was never one of Disney’s classics, a movie extremely of its time in its “girl power” gender politics and with a decidedly American take on ancient Chinese mythology. It got by on a couple good songs and a strong lead, but it was a movie that could be improved upon, and this new version looked like it had the potential to do that, emphasizing

The Hays Code was Bad, Sex in Movies is Good

Don't Look Now (1973) Will Hays, Who Knows About Sex In 1930, former Republican politician and chair of the Motion Picture Association of America Will Hayes introduced a series of self-censorship guidelines for the movie industry in response to a mixture of celebrity scandals and lobbying from the Catholic Church against various ‘immoralities’ creating a perception of Hollywood as corrupt and indecent. The Hays Code, or the Motion Picture Production Code, was formally adopted in 1930, though not stringently enforced until 1934 under the auspices of Joseph Breen. It laid out a careful list of what was and wasn’t acceptable for a film expecting major distribution. It stipulated rules against profanity, the depiction of miscegenation, and offensive portrayals of the clergy, but a lot of it was based around sexual content: “sexual perversion” of any kind was disallowed, as were any opaquely textual or visual allusions to reproduction, and right near the top “No licentious or suggestiv

Pixar Sundays: The Incredibles (2004)

          Brad Bird was already a master by the time he came to Pixar. Not only did he hone his craft as an early director on The Simpsons , but he directed a little animated film for Warner Bros. in 1999, that though not a box office success was loved by critics and quickly grew a cult following. The Iron Giant is now among many people’s favourite animated movies. Likewise, Bird’s feature debut at Pixar, The Incredibles , his own variation of a superhero movie, is often considered one of the studio’s best. And for very good reason, as the most talented director at Pixar shows.            Superheroes were once the world’s greatest crime-fighting force until several lawsuits for collateral damage (and in the case of Mr. Incredible, a hilarious suicide prevention), outlawed their vigilantism. Fifteen years later Mr. Incredible, now living as Bob Parr, has a family with his wife Helen, the former Elastigirl. But Bob, in a combination of mid-life crisis and nostalgia for the old day