Skip to main content

Searching Makes Your Desktop a Star


A concept like the one used to convey the plot of Searching is a risky venture. It’s not dependable and has to do a lot to even be sustainable for an hour and forty minutes, requiring completely new ways to create suspense, develop characters, and move its story along. Director Aneesh Chaganty took this challenge with all its hurdles and did the best in his ability to make it work.
This is a film shot entirely from the point-of-view of computer screens and smartphones, an idea that’s been attempted before but never to warm reception. However Chaganty manages much more with the gimmick than is to be expected, as even with its inherent flaws this movie and its presentation never bores you.
It revolves around the disappearance of a teenager Margot Kim (Michelle La) and her father David’s (John Cho) attempt to investigate and find her through clues in her internet and social media history, uncovering her secrets along the way and making connections with the help of his case detective (Debra Messing).  
This camera allows for an intimacy few other movies can attain. It gives the audience a first-person perspective of what David is seeing, doing, and learning. This means there are portions of the movie where there’s little to no dialogue and all we’re seeing is David googling stuff or watching videos. However the movie still retains the effect of its suspense, because we’re finding out things alongside him -sometimes we even know something before he does. For example, we see his daughter calling him a few times on the screen while the webcam shows him asleep. This movie finds a way to make research, clicking links, reconfiguring security settings, and simply searching in a web browser thrilling. Because in addition to the grim score and the mystery, we know how hideous a place the internet can be, and are as anxious David is at what it’ll reveal about his daughter. And there’s some creativity in the format as well -there would have to be. The easy parts are conveying conversations -the movie just needs to show a video call. Action is a bit more difficult. For that the movie uses video footage on news sites or a youtube page to show what David’s doing in the world outside his laptop. Pictures are used as a frequent communication tool as well.
But while Chaganty proves his story can be told through merely screens, there are limitations to this commitment to style. The audience is divorced from the action, the developments that take place elsewhere, because they become a third person viewer. Plot-wise there are things that don’t make sense, confrontations that don’t have the weight they deserve; and also, while there are a number of moments where David has his webcam on himself, there are large chunks of the movie where he’s either reduced to the corner or not on screen at all, depriving the movie of a human presence. Ingmar Bergman said “the human face is the great subject of the cinema”, and there are times where Davids’ face needs to be seen in this movie for the sake of an emotional response or confused reaction, and instead we’re just looking at a webpage with little more than still images of people on it.
In spite of this John Cho does a really good job acting the desperate, fearful, and angered father. Everyone can relate to his drive and determination. Additionally, Michelle La is a superb troubled teenager, and Debra Messing is pretty exemplary too.
Importantly, this movie understands the internet, and goes to great lengths to replicate it. It’s a film whose web designer is just as important as its production designer, but it goes beyond just using real computer software and internet hubs, creating authentic looking sites and search results. Searching understands that the internet can be used as a great tool, but also that it has an extraordinary capacity for manipulation, secrecy, and harassment. There’s a frightening implication in a series of facebook messages David finds, trolls attack Davids’ character in comments sections -an offensive gif is created, and of course we see Margot sexually harassed on a livestream. The movie also has some things to say on internet anonymity, what people can get away with when they’re hidden behind usernames and private accounts, and just how dangerous that environment is.
With factors such as these, this movie does present a pretty decent mystery in a curious way. That’s what Searching is really, a curiosity. One worth checking out for its novelty and how it can tell a story with that novelty, even if it falls short of other films that have had similar plots.


Follow me on Twitter: https://twitter.com/Jordan_D_Bosch 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Strange History of the American Spoof Movie

Parody movies have been around for a lot longer than we tend to think of them. Even from the earliest days of Hollywood there were movies meant to satirize a particular subject or genre. In the silent era, Buster Keaton was responsible for a few. And in the early sound era, almost as soon as the monster pictures took off did you see comic versions of them -Abbott and Costello hosting a few. But parody movies tended to be subtle for most of cinema history, or parody came in conjunction with another goal of the comedy. It really wasn’t until the 1980s and 90s that it took off and became popularly understood. And there is perhaps a line to be drawn to the counterculture comedy explosion that began in the 1970s through avenues like  Saturday Night Live , which frequently parodied from even its earliest years popular movies and cultural properties of the time. But that is still a way’s back. To my generation though, ‘parody movie’ is perhaps a less known term than the more blunt ‘s...

Notes on the Title Cards of The Lord of the Rings

It might be sacrilege for one who both considers The Lord of the Rings  trilogy to be one of the greatest triumphs of cinema and has been an avid lover of the films since adolescence, to declare that the original theatrical cuts of the films are better than the much beloved extended editions. Easily it’s my most controversial opinion regarding these movies. Don’t get me wrong, I do like the extended editions quite a lot, especially as someone who just enjoys spending time in that universe. They flesh it out more, add extra flavour, and in increasing the length by about an hour really emphasize the epic quality of these films. But I find that the original cuts are generally more cleanly paced, more seamlessly edited, and much more accessible to audiences. All the stuff there is to love about The Lord of the Rings  is there in the original versions, the plethora of new and extended scenes merely add to that for fans. And of those, they fall into three camps for me: 1....

Back to the Feature: New York, New York (1977)

New York, New York  is a two hour forty minute musical movie largely about a toxic relationship and I understand why it was Martin Scorsese’s first big flop. Some have blamed its poor reception on the kind of movie it was, of a style and tone Scorsese wasn’t known for, but I find that hard to believe. Even after only five films, he’d proven himself an extremely versatile director, and Alice Doesn’t Live Here Anymore  found an audience. Sure this jazz musical love letter to New York City was following up Taxi Driver and its’ far more cynical take on the city, but then it’s also ‘from the director of Taxi Driver ’ which itself was a big hit. Was it a matter of public appetite for musicals, or mere word of mouth and early critical reception that dissuaded viewers? Irrespective of that, I was stunned to discover this movie was the origin of the titular song, which I’d assumed was much older (it’s definitely got the sound of something that might have come out of the Jazz sce...