Skip to main content

The Oscars' Most Desperate Ploy

The reception of the very first Academy Awards in 1929 -not a lot has changed.
At the very first Academy Awards ceremony in 1929, there was an accolade handed out that has never been present at any ceremony since. It was called the Best Unique or Artistic Picture Award and its sole winner is F.W. Murnau’s Sunrise, or a Song of Two Humans, a far better film than Best Picture winner Wings. It was discontinued after a year because the Academy realized it was redundant and lessened the very idea of a “Best Picture”.  Wings was a more popular movie, and during the early years of the Academy it was essentially a popularity contest, but eventually it adopted the idea behind the Best Unique or Artistic Picture more than simply the movie that was most successful that year.
Earlier today it was announced that the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences, in an attempt to boost dwindling ratings for their Oscar show, were going to be changing some significant aspects of their ceremony starting with next years’ awards. Firstly, they’re going to move some of their lower-profile categories off the show to the commercial breaks, with only brief recaps during the main show a la the Tonys. Sound mixers and sound designers will almost certainly be affected by this and I won’t be surprised if the three short film categories (live-action, animated, and documentary) are eliminated altogether despite assurances no award will be completely removed from the telecast.
But the other and arguably more significant change is the addition of a new category for Best Popular Film, or something to that effect, which will award a commercially successful film of the year; and unlike the Foreign Language, Animated, or Documentary awards, this one will likely be presented on close if not equal terms with Best Picture to rouse more audience interest.
I hate this. I really really do. To start, if the Academy wants to condense their show to actually end on time for a change, there are far better ways to do that than by sidelining peoples’ chance to celebrate their achievements just because a supporting performance is arbitrarily more important than production design. Maybe cut those stupid stunts for example, like ordering pizza or crashing a movie screening, that are almost always more awkward than entertaining to watch. Or the live performances of Best Original Song nominees that most likely were introduced to bring in more viewers, but are really an exercise more fit for the Tonys. There are plenty of gags and sketches that pad out the runtime, and they can be funny, but they’re not important in a show that’s’ purpose is to honour excellence.
And the addition of an award for popular movies is the most blatant type of pandering that greatly insults both the Best Picture nominees and its own. The prestige of the art of the one is lessened by the presence of the other and any movies nominated in the new category are being told their primary value is how much money they’ve made. This move also insults cinephiles and Oscar fans, as well as casual moviegoers, suggesting that the movies they pay to see aren’t good enough to be considered Best Picture worthy (I mean, by and large they aren’t, but its’ bad form to openly say so). It’s so obvious this is a desperate push to win viewers over and I don’t think that many are going to fall for it.
What’s also clear is that this is an excuse to give Black Panther a nomination, and at this point in the year it’s deserving of one without all this bullshit. It doesn’t need a new category to be nominated; it’s in the same class as movies like Indian Horse and First Reformed. Michael B. Jordan gave still the best supporting performance I’ve seen this year, the costuming and production design are well-worth Oscar notice, and Ryan Coogler at least deserves consideration for his direction. But Black Panther couldn’t possibly be nominated for Best Picture as a blockbuster! It’s that same othering that resulted in the periphery movie categories, which imply that foreign language, animated, or documentary films are separate entities that don’t count as “Best Pictures” -only those categories at least serve a purpose in granting more exposure for films that otherwise wouldn’t get any. “Popular movies” get tons of exposure already, make bank for their studio, and don’t need any more recognition than they already get.
At the end of the day all this does is cheapen the Oscars’ value and detract even more from their credibility. In a way it’s a kind of hilarious bid for attention, if it weren’t coming at the expense of esteemed artists getting their accomplishments brushed over. The Oscars have an image problem, there’s no denying that, but this is certainly not the answer. In fact if anything, it proves just how out of touch the Academy is. By attempting to make the Oscars seem less elitist for a casual moviegoing audience, they’ve made themselves look more elitist than ever.

Follow me on Twitter: https://twitter.com/Jordan_D_Bosch 
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Strange History of the American Spoof Movie

Parody movies have been around for a lot longer than we tend to think of them. Even from the earliest days of Hollywood there were movies meant to satirize a particular subject or genre. In the silent era, Buster Keaton was responsible for a few. And in the early sound era, almost as soon as the monster pictures took off did you see comic versions of them -Abbott and Costello hosting a few. But parody movies tended to be subtle for most of cinema history, or parody came in conjunction with another goal of the comedy. It really wasn’t until the 1980s and 90s that it took off and became popularly understood. And there is perhaps a line to be drawn to the counterculture comedy explosion that began in the 1970s through avenues like  Saturday Night Live , which frequently parodied from even its earliest years popular movies and cultural properties of the time. But that is still a way’s back. To my generation though, ‘parody movie’ is perhaps a less known term than the more blunt ‘s...
Post a Comment
Read more

Notes on the Title Cards of The Lord of the Rings

It might be sacrilege for one who both considers The Lord of the Rings  trilogy to be one of the greatest triumphs of cinema and has been an avid lover of the films since adolescence, to declare that the original theatrical cuts of the films are better than the much beloved extended editions. Easily it’s my most controversial opinion regarding these movies. Don’t get me wrong, I do like the extended editions quite a lot, especially as someone who just enjoys spending time in that universe. They flesh it out more, add extra flavour, and in increasing the length by about an hour really emphasize the epic quality of these films. But I find that the original cuts are generally more cleanly paced, more seamlessly edited, and much more accessible to audiences. All the stuff there is to love about The Lord of the Rings  is there in the original versions, the plethora of new and extended scenes merely add to that for fans. And of those, they fall into three camps for me: 1....
1 comment
Read more

Back to the Feature: New York, New York (1977)

New York, New York  is a two hour forty minute musical movie largely about a toxic relationship and I understand why it was Martin Scorsese’s first big flop. Some have blamed its poor reception on the kind of movie it was, of a style and tone Scorsese wasn’t known for, but I find that hard to believe. Even after only five films, he’d proven himself an extremely versatile director, and Alice Doesn’t Live Here Anymore  found an audience. Sure this jazz musical love letter to New York City was following up Taxi Driver and its’ far more cynical take on the city, but then it’s also ‘from the director of Taxi Driver ’ which itself was a big hit. Was it a matter of public appetite for musicals, or mere word of mouth and early critical reception that dissuaded viewers? Irrespective of that, I was stunned to discover this movie was the origin of the titular song, which I’d assumed was much older (it’s definitely got the sound of something that might have come out of the Jazz sce...
Post a Comment
Read more