Skip to main content

Hotel Transylvania 3: Cruise Control


The Hotel Transylvania movies are made for two audiences: children, and Genndy Tartakovsky fans. For my generation growing up, Tartakovsky was a big deal. The man pretty much single-handedly invented Cartoon Network in the late 90’s and early 2000’s, with shows like Dexter’s Laboratory, Samurai Jack, and the first Star Wars: Clone Wars (he was also heavily involved in The Powerpuff Girls). And it’s his unique style more than anything that has separated the Hotel Transylvania movies from other animated kids’ fare. The obnoxiously titled Hotel Transylvania 3: Summer Vacation makes the series a trilogy and breaks with the tradition of releasing these films around Halloween. Whether this effects its performance remains to be seen, but it certainly mixes up the premise and atmosphere.
Count Dracula (Adam Sandler) is still running Hotel Transylvania, but mistaking his loneliness for stress, his daughter Mavis (Selena Gomez) arranges a cruise trip for the family and all the other denizens of the hotel. However the cruise is run by Captain Ericka (Kathryn Hahn), the secret great-granddaughter of Abraham Van Helsing (Jim Gaffigan), sworn to kill Dracula, who, unaware of this, is falling in love with her.
The change of scenery does benefit this movie. One of the biggest problems with Hotel Transylvania 2 was that there was little variety in its design, and there wasn’t much more creativity to sap out of the same moody, gothic setting. There is nothing at all gothic about a cruise ship, and the movie has no problem embracing its new look, and with that some new humour. The comedy is still very much that highly energized, expressive kind of slapstick that’s Tartakovsky’s trademark, and it’s these physical jokes that work more than most of the dialogue gags. Some of the scenes of Dracula obliviously foiling Ericka’s attempts to kill him for example, have the pacing, rhythm, and inventiveness of a Sylvester and Tweety cartoon. There are a number of sequences like this, visually creative, interesting, and manic more often than not, and they’re the best parts of the movie -especially when they’re also cleverly paying homage to the likes of The Addams Family and The Twilight Zone. However not every piece of slapstick lands, and a there are a number of cliché jokes, as well as some that just don’t work in this context. Mumbling gibberish to indicate being infatuated was almost always funny coming from Mel Blanc, not so much from Adam Sandler.
It’s easy to criticize Sandler these last few years given his track record, but he’s largely been perfectly fine in this series. Much of Dracula’s storyline is driven by misunderstanding, and obviously includes a typical liar revealed device. It’s broken up though, which softens its laziness, by the humour and by other subplots. Kathryn Hahn does well as the film focusses on Ericka quite a bit, and Mavis has the more conservative arc for a change, being preoccupied with her fathers’ budding romance while wanting a family vacation. Gomez isn’t bad, though Andy Samberg as her human husband Johnny is more useless than he’s been in either previous film. There’s also comedic threads linked to Wayne and Wanda Werewolf (Steve Buscemi and Molly Shannon) being free of their horde of children, and Mavis’ young son and his friend -a veritable Linus and Sally who are adorable- trying to keep their giant stowaway dog a secret. The only one of these that gets grating is the arc of Van Helsing himself and his evil machinations. His aggravating personality matches his hideous appearance in the worst way possible. Kevin James, Fran Drescher, David Spade, Keegan Michael-Key, and Mel Brooks reprise their roles as well.
The biggest highlight of any Hotel Transylvania movie though is Tartakovsky’s stylized animation. Even though it’s computer animation, it operates on very traditional techniques. These include heavy exaggeration in the characters’ features, movement, and shapes, and an avoidance of three-dimensional textures to maintain a cartoonish flexibility. Tartakovsky said in an interview with the LA Times in 2012: "I don't want to do animation to mimic reality; I want to push reality." And he’s done that very successfully in all his projects, clearly heavily influenced by folks like Tex Avery and Chuck Jones. Hotel Transylvania 3 demonstrates this better than its predecessor, and it makes even some of the lacklustre story moments look dynamic. And for those who’ve watched Tartakovsky’s cartoons, it’s fun noticing his familiar tricks.
These are some pretty positive things to say about a movie that uses its climax to shamelessly showcase what songs they have the rights to. Really, the Hotel Transylvania films aren’t great animated movies by any stretch. But Hotel Transylvania 3 is the funniest of them, and maybe in some strange way, the most charming. Obviously it’s not got the spooky Halloween atmosphere of the previous films, but that’s okay -the original did that well enough; and like the original, this one’s surprisingly good for what it is: an energetic, creative, colourful, innocuous kids movie that will get some good laughs out of adults as well.

 Follow me on Twitter: https://twitter.com/Jordan_D_Bosch 
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Strange History of the American Spoof Movie

Parody movies have been around for a lot longer than we tend to think of them. Even from the earliest days of Hollywood there were movies meant to satirize a particular subject or genre. In the silent era, Buster Keaton was responsible for a few. And in the early sound era, almost as soon as the monster pictures took off did you see comic versions of them -Abbott and Costello hosting a few. But parody movies tended to be subtle for most of cinema history, or parody came in conjunction with another goal of the comedy. It really wasn’t until the 1980s and 90s that it took off and became popularly understood. And there is perhaps a line to be drawn to the counterculture comedy explosion that began in the 1970s through avenues like  Saturday Night Live , which frequently parodied from even its earliest years popular movies and cultural properties of the time. But that is still a way’s back. To my generation though, ‘parody movie’ is perhaps a less known term than the more blunt ‘s...
Post a Comment
Read more

Notes on the Title Cards of The Lord of the Rings

It might be sacrilege for one who both considers The Lord of the Rings  trilogy to be one of the greatest triumphs of cinema and has been an avid lover of the films since adolescence, to declare that the original theatrical cuts of the films are better than the much beloved extended editions. Easily it’s my most controversial opinion regarding these movies. Don’t get me wrong, I do like the extended editions quite a lot, especially as someone who just enjoys spending time in that universe. They flesh it out more, add extra flavour, and in increasing the length by about an hour really emphasize the epic quality of these films. But I find that the original cuts are generally more cleanly paced, more seamlessly edited, and much more accessible to audiences. All the stuff there is to love about The Lord of the Rings  is there in the original versions, the plethora of new and extended scenes merely add to that for fans. And of those, they fall into three camps for me: 1....
1 comment
Read more

Back to the Feature: New York, New York (1977)

New York, New York  is a two hour forty minute musical movie largely about a toxic relationship and I understand why it was Martin Scorsese’s first big flop. Some have blamed its poor reception on the kind of movie it was, of a style and tone Scorsese wasn’t known for, but I find that hard to believe. Even after only five films, he’d proven himself an extremely versatile director, and Alice Doesn’t Live Here Anymore  found an audience. Sure this jazz musical love letter to New York City was following up Taxi Driver and its’ far more cynical take on the city, but then it’s also ‘from the director of Taxi Driver ’ which itself was a big hit. Was it a matter of public appetite for musicals, or mere word of mouth and early critical reception that dissuaded viewers? Irrespective of that, I was stunned to discover this movie was the origin of the titular song, which I’d assumed was much older (it’s definitely got the sound of something that might have come out of the Jazz sce...
Post a Comment
Read more