Skip to main content

Fred Rogers Doc is Special Just the Way It Is


As a Canadian child of the 90s, I didn’t know of Mr. Rogers as much as his Canadian counterpart Mr. Dressup. Nevertheless, I was still incredibly charmed and moved by Won’t You Be My Neighbor?, a documentary from 20 Feet from Stardom director Morgan Neville, about the life of Fred Rogers, his seminal childrens’ program, Mister Rogers’ Neighborhood, and his philosophy on childhood.
Through interviews with those who worked with him, family, and footage of the man himself, the movie paints a picture of Fred Rogers, an ordained Presbyterian minister and student of child psychology; and how his passion for teaching and communicating with children, stemming from his own personal connection to childhood, led to a decades-spanning staple of childrens’ television. Discussing the history of the show, the film touches on everything from him single-handedly convincing Senator John Pastore to restore funding to PBS, to his short-lived show for adults, to his adorable meeting with the recently deceased Koko the gorilla, all the while emphasizing the themes of kindness, empathy, and love he espoused week after week for the duration his show was on the air.
The mark of a good documentary is in how it’s structured and edited to best present its point. The production is a lot more fragmented than a narrative film, so it requires a great deal more surety of how the story needs to be conveyed and framed. Neville does this incredibly well, choosing not to focus much on Rogers’ early life except in how it pertains to the legacy of his show and character. The film also utilizes animated segments to illustrate Rogers’ own feelings, cleverly personifying him through his alter ego, Daniel Striped Tiger. It weaves its way seamlessly through the chronology of Rogers’ life and the significant bullet points of his show, relating a better idea of its importance on American culture and the impact it’s left. And it keeps you interested, as it intersects history with footage, through which we see in practice his love for children. On Rogers’ penchant for slow, quiet respites on his show, someone in the movie remarked that despite the silence not a moment was wasted. No moment is wasted in this movie either.
This film is a character study and tribute much more than a biography. It touches on a few aspects of Rogers’ life that are unusual, such as his consistent ‘143’ lb weight and how he maintained it, as well as the public perception of his odd T.V. persona, which was really his own persona, no façade. But what mostly interests Neville is Rogers’ philosophy and devotion to his work. Rooted in his faith, primarily adherence to the Christian Golden Rule, Rogers practiced and instilled in children the virtues of kindness, generosity, honesty, charity, and empathy towards all, and he was resolute and bold in doing this, even if he didn’t seem so. Because he addressed kids comfortably on their own terms with a deep understanding of how they processed the world, he could relate these values in cogent ways. His show tackled tons of issues considered taboo in childrens’ entertainment, such as grief, divorce, war, and in a particularly wonderful and intelligent bit, depression. The show was very topical too, addressing things like the assassination of Bobby Kennedy and the Challenger disaster. In this, he was teaching parents how to explain the harsh realities of life to children as well. Perhaps my favourite part is a clip where, in defiance of segregated swimming pools, he invites his black neighbourhood police officer played by Francois Clemmons to soak his feet in a little tide pool with him -giving the camera a knowing look as he does so. Nobody really considers Mr. Rogers for the rebel he was and this doc deserves credit for that. His dim views on childrens’ television and media in general also pushed him to give himself more to the importance of his mission; and though you certainly don’t agree with all of his viewpoints, it’s hard not to see the nobility behind it all.
Won’t You Be My Neighbor? is also the most persistently poignant film I’ve seen this year. Rogers’ kindness transcends the screen and touches your heart. This sentiment doesn’t feel artificial, rather it exudes naturally from the man being celebrated through little more than playing a few of his songs on friendliness and self-worth; his message on each child being special demonstrated in his patient, completely invested interactions with them. An anecdote about children in a hospital “testing” him by way of an unusual question, is quite as affecting as him talking sweetly to a boy with a disability about to undergo major surgery. The movie is dotted with heartwarming moments because its subject was such a heartwarming figure.
Fred Rogers died in 2003. In the fifteen years since then, there’s been plenty of time to make a documentary about his life and career, so the fact that Won’t You Be My Neighbor? comes at a time of especially heavy turbulence and misery in the country he was most revered in is no accident. The compassion, decency, and love he felt so essential for people to understand is in stark contrast to the actions of a lot of people in the world today. The films’ thesis is that Rogers and his message are needed now more than ever. And that appears to be very much true.

Follow me on Twitter: https://twitter.com/Jordan_D_Bosch 
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Strange History of the American Spoof Movie

Parody movies have been around for a lot longer than we tend to think of them. Even from the earliest days of Hollywood there were movies meant to satirize a particular subject or genre. In the silent era, Buster Keaton was responsible for a few. And in the early sound era, almost as soon as the monster pictures took off did you see comic versions of them -Abbott and Costello hosting a few. But parody movies tended to be subtle for most of cinema history, or parody came in conjunction with another goal of the comedy. It really wasn’t until the 1980s and 90s that it took off and became popularly understood. And there is perhaps a line to be drawn to the counterculture comedy explosion that began in the 1970s through avenues like  Saturday Night Live , which frequently parodied from even its earliest years popular movies and cultural properties of the time. But that is still a way’s back. To my generation though, ‘parody movie’ is perhaps a less known term than the more blunt ‘s...
1 comment
Read more

A Stylish and Charmingly Reinvented David Copperfield

The Personal History, Adventures, Experience and Observation of David Copperfield the Younger of Blunderstone Rookery (Which He Never Meant to Publish on Any Account)  is the most important book Charles Dickens ever wrote. It is not the most famous or influential by any means (that would of course be A Christmas Carol ), but it is the book that is the purest expression of the authors’ style, identity, and worldview. It is his most personal work, semi-autobiographical in its story of the chronology from infancy to adulthood of a character who overcomes great loss and hardships to find a fulfilling life as a writer. To read David Copperfield  is to understand Dickens himself. Armando Iannucci knew this when he decided to make a new adaptation of the novel for a twenty-first century audience. He also knew that Dickens adaptations are ubiquitous at this point. Films are a bit rarer, but every few years a new television adaptation rears its head to keep the authors’ unique world an...
Post a Comment
Read more

Notes on the Title Cards of The Lord of the Rings

It might be sacrilege for one who both considers The Lord of the Rings  trilogy to be one of the greatest triumphs of cinema and has been an avid lover of the films since adolescence, to declare that the original theatrical cuts of the films are better than the much beloved extended editions. Easily it’s my most controversial opinion regarding these movies. Don’t get me wrong, I do like the extended editions quite a lot, especially as someone who just enjoys spending time in that universe. They flesh it out more, add extra flavour, and in increasing the length by about an hour really emphasize the epic quality of these films. But I find that the original cuts are generally more cleanly paced, more seamlessly edited, and much more accessible to audiences. All the stuff there is to love about The Lord of the Rings  is there in the original versions, the plethora of new and extended scenes merely add to that for fans. And of those, they fall into three camps for me: 1....
14 comments
Read more