Spielberg Sundays Introduction

Why Spielberg? Of all the directors with great bodies of work, why him? I could talk about Kurosawa or Satyajit Ray, the movies of Carl Theodor Dreyer or David Lean. Surely Spielberg’s too popular, too Hollywood, to talk about already. I highly respect the man, but he’s not one of my favourite filmmakers.

Though he has made a few of my favourite films. And it can’t be denied, no other movie director has had the impact he’s had, and so thoroughly changed the film industry, at least in the west. Steven Spielberg is often credited for inventing the blockbuster, and arguably no other movie director is as recognizable or iconic to the general public. Although he has his recurring themes, stylistic touches, and clichés, it’s sometimes forgotten how varied his movies have been. He’s worked in a number of different genres with distinct types of stories. He’s moulded North American pop culture like no other in his line of work, and because of all that, he demands attention. His movies demand discussion and scrutiny.

I’ve been thinking back on Spielberg’s career since seeing Ready Player One, a story which in of itself is directly influenced by his own work. It’s a movie that feels like a conscious effort on Spielberg’s part to reconcile and reflect, if not on his movies specifically, than on the culture they played a big part in creating. It’s especially resonant given that it’s a return to the kind of big-budget crowd-pleasing film he tried to avoid for a while. His career has had a fascinating trajectory in relation to the types of movies he made his name on, and I think it would be really fun and insightful to look at that journey. How have his movies changed, what was it that made them special, what is it he wants to convey? Over a career spanning five decades (fifty years ago was the release of his first short), he’s directed thirty-two feature films -not counting the segment he directed for Twilight Zone: The Movie or possibly Poltergeist. And like any director, he’s helmed his share of duds in addition to the classics he’s brought us. Tracing his filmography also gives me a chance to see the movies of his I’ve missed, and reviewing each one may create a fuller picture of the artist. So that’s what I’m going to do for my next “Sunday” series

He’s a fascinating figure, Steven Spielberg. Let’s dive into his roots.

Comments

The Strange History of the American Spoof Movie

Parody movies have been around for a lot longer than we tend to think of them. Even from the earliest days of Hollywood there were movies meant to satirize a particular subject or genre. In the silent era, Buster Keaton was responsible for a few. And in the early sound era, almost as soon as the monster pictures took off did you see comic versions of them -Abbott and Costello hosting a few. But parody movies tended to be subtle for most of cinema history, or parody came in conjunction with another goal of the comedy. It really wasn’t until the 1980s and 90s that it took off and became popularly understood. And there is perhaps a line to be drawn to the counterculture comedy explosion that began in the 1970s through avenues like Saturday Night Live , which frequently parodied from even its earliest years popular movies and cultural properties of the time. But that is still a way’s back. To my generation though, ‘parody movie’ is perhaps a less known term than the more blunt ‘s...

Notes on the Title Cards of The Lord of the Rings

It might be sacrilege for one who both considers The Lord of the Rings trilogy to be one of the greatest triumphs of cinema and has been an avid lover of the films since adolescence, to declare that the original theatrical cuts of the films are better than the much beloved extended editions. Easily it’s my most controversial opinion regarding these movies. Don’t get me wrong, I do like the extended editions quite a lot, especially as someone who just enjoys spending time in that universe. They flesh it out more, add extra flavour, and in increasing the length by about an hour really emphasize the epic quality of these films. But I find that the original cuts are generally more cleanly paced, more seamlessly edited, and much more accessible to audiences. All the stuff there is to love about The Lord of the Rings is there in the original versions, the plethora of new and extended scenes merely add to that for fans. And of those, they fall into three camps for me: 1....

Back to the Feature: New York, New York (1977)

New York, New York is a two hour forty minute musical movie largely about a toxic relationship and I understand why it was Martin Scorsese’s first big flop. Some have blamed its poor reception on the kind of movie it was, of a style and tone Scorsese wasn’t known for, but I find that hard to believe. Even after only five films, he’d proven himself an extremely versatile director, and Alice Doesn’t Live Here Anymore found an audience. Sure this jazz musical love letter to New York City was following up Taxi Driver and its’ far more cynical take on the city, but then it’s also ‘from the director of Taxi Driver ’ which itself was a big hit. Was it a matter of public appetite for musicals, or mere word of mouth and early critical reception that dissuaded viewers? Irrespective of that, I was stunned to discover this movie was the origin of the titular song, which I’d assumed was much older (it’s definitely got the sound of something that might have come out of the Jazz sce...

Reviews of the Bosch

Search This Blog