Skip to main content

Most Unorthodox


It didn’t take long for Sebastián Lelio, the Chilean director of the Academy Award winning A Fantastic Woman, to begin to branch out internationally -by which I mean to English-language cinema with prominent English-language actors and crew. But he continues to be drawn to the subject matter of marginalized or suppressed sexual freedom with Disobedience, an adaptation of the novel by Naomi Alderman. Written by Lelio and Rebecca Lenkiewicz, it’s a film that does justice to, if not the novel, the themes and message it clearly wanted to relate.
Ronit Krushka (Rachel Weisz) returns home to London from New York after learning of the death of her father, an esteemed Orthodox Jewish rav (Anton Lesser). Having been ousted by the community for leaving the faith, her return is awkward for everyone except her childhood friends Dovid (Alessandro Nivola), her fathers’ successor, and his wife Esti (Rachel McAdams) who’d once been Ronits’ lover. But with her return, the womens’ feelings are reignited, causing trouble and drama within this strict conservative patriarchy.
Lelio and Lenkiewicz do an excellent job building the story through suggestion and nuance. Not a lot is explained at the outset, rather personal details and histories come up gradually as the film goes along in natural dialogue. Though the exact nature of Ronit and Esti’s prior relationship isn’t directly discussed until the second act, the striking sexual tension between them clues us in enough. Same for the reason Ronit initially left London. The characters are all written very realistically too, with none of the Orthodox figures coming off as exaggerations. They adhere to strict tradition and ideology but not at the expense of personality. In addition to the script, this movie is also shot very well and often in a way that emphasizes the mood. There’s a bleakness to a lot of the movie, which could just be an effect of being set in late winter in London, but it also reflects the dullness and repression of this Orthodoxy. Disorienting cinematography in select moments allows the audience to feel the disorientation and anxiety going through a characters’ mind, whether it be Ronit, Esti, or Dovid. And of course the intimate scenes between Ronit and Esti are shot very closely and passionately, while similar scenes between Esti and Dovid are restrained and detached.
The driving force of this movie though are the performances, particularly from Weisz and McAdams. Their chemistry is wonderful. Obviously it’s not as liberated or innate as other romances, but it makes perfect sense given these characters’ upbringing, and how long they’ve been apart. Their commitment is developed well and makes them a really endearing couple. Weisz’s performance is the best I’ve seen from her in a while, handling a lot of complex emotions she can’t quite vocally express. In addition to Esti being back in Ronit’s life, she’s also dealing with grief and the regret of not having made up with her father before his death. Her attempts to reconcile these conflicting feelings illustrate a fuller character. McAdams isn’t short-changed by this focus though and performs impeccably Esti’s own conflict. Though quieter about it, she holds Ronit’s modern feminist views on marriage and feminine agency, but feels a responsibility in the life she has and her vocation as a teacher. Her arc is more important, there are more stakes attached and its incredibly investing. Nivola is very good too, unlikeable and ignorant at times, but understandable when his history, both as the rav’s pupil and as a long-time close friend of the women, is taken into account.
If it has one, this movie’s weakness might just be that the plot itself is a little conventional. The forbidden lust story, usually between homosexuals, within the confines of a deeply traditional or religious environment is a popular type of drama fiction. Disobedience isn’t bad as far as these movies go, in fact it’s probably one of the best (though it’s title does recall the fake Robert Downey Jr. trailer from Tropic Thunder). And it’s worth noting that rather than being about sexual discovery in a prohibitive environment, it’s much more about freedom.
Yet any time a movie addresses homosexuality in a religious context like this it’s imparting an honourable message and call for change. Disobedience does that aptly by taking its audience into a world many of us may find alien, highlighting its traditions and attitudes, and commenting on where some of them may be out of touch and should evolve. But it’s not anti-religious by any means. And it’s made exceptional by its direction and writing, its cinematography and characterizations, and its performances, with Weisz and McAdams alike delivering among their finest. Disobedience further establishes Sebastián Lelio as a director to watch and is a quality film to see this Pride Month.

Follow me on Twitter: https://twitter.com/Jordan_D_Bosch 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Disney's Mulan, Cultural Appropriation, and Exploitation

I’m late on this one I know. I wasn’t willing to spend thirty bucks back in September for a movie experience I knew was going to be far poorer than if I had paid half that at a theatre. So I waited for it to hit streaming for free to give it a shot. In the meantime I heard that it wasn’t very good, but I remained determined not to skip it entirely, partly out of sympathy for director Niki Caro and partly out of morbid curiosity. Disney’s live-action Mulan  I was actually mildly looking forward to early in the year in spite of my well-documented distaste for this series of creative dead zones by the most powerful media conglomerate on earth. Mulan  was never one of Disney’s classics, a movie extremely of its time in its “girl power” gender politics and with a decidedly American take on ancient Chinese mythology. It got by on a couple good songs and a strong lead, but it was a movie that could be improved upon, and this new version looked like it had the potential to do that, emphasizing

The Hays Code was Bad, Sex in Movies is Good

Don't Look Now (1973) Will Hays, Who Knows About Sex In 1930, former Republican politician and chair of the Motion Picture Association of America Will Hayes introduced a series of self-censorship guidelines for the movie industry in response to a mixture of celebrity scandals and lobbying from the Catholic Church against various ‘immoralities’ creating a perception of Hollywood as corrupt and indecent. The Hays Code, or the Motion Picture Production Code, was formally adopted in 1930, though not stringently enforced until 1934 under the auspices of Joseph Breen. It laid out a careful list of what was and wasn’t acceptable for a film expecting major distribution. It stipulated rules against profanity, the depiction of miscegenation, and offensive portrayals of the clergy, but a lot of it was based around sexual content: “sexual perversion” of any kind was disallowed, as were any opaquely textual or visual allusions to reproduction, and right near the top “No licentious or suggestiv

Pixar Sundays: The Incredibles (2004)

          Brad Bird was already a master by the time he came to Pixar. Not only did he hone his craft as an early director on The Simpsons , but he directed a little animated film for Warner Bros. in 1999, that though not a box office success was loved by critics and quickly grew a cult following. The Iron Giant is now among many people’s favourite animated movies. Likewise, Bird’s feature debut at Pixar, The Incredibles , his own variation of a superhero movie, is often considered one of the studio’s best. And for very good reason, as the most talented director at Pixar shows.            Superheroes were once the world’s greatest crime-fighting force until several lawsuits for collateral damage (and in the case of Mr. Incredible, a hilarious suicide prevention), outlawed their vigilantism. Fifteen years later Mr. Incredible, now living as Bob Parr, has a family with his wife Helen, the former Elastigirl. But Bob, in a combination of mid-life crisis and nostalgia for the old day