Skip to main content

Back to the Feature: Withnail and I (1987)


I'm a big fan of Doctor Who. So the fact that not one but two Doctors (one canonical, one not) got their start in a cult British movie from the 1980s obviously makes me curious about it. Withnail and I is a 1987 dark comedy written and directed by Bruce Robinson that’s become something of a sensation in Britain in the decades since its release. It was the career-making movie for Richard E. Grant and Paul McGann and has that same grungy allure of other British youth culture movies like Shallow Grave and Trainspotting (though pre-dating them by almost a decade). It’s also ever so slightly dated, but still quotable and likeable enough for its plot, attitude, and performances.
Withnail (Grant) and I (McGann) are a pair of down-on-their-luck actors living in squalid conditions in 1969 London passing their time looking for work and wallowing in the state of their careers. Withnail, an over-dramatic eccentric, arranges for the two to take a holiday at his Uncle Monty’s (Richard Griffiths) cottage in Cumbria. The film then follows their unusual and downright farcical experience there.
Withnail and I is very light on plot, but there’s a charm to how basic it is. It could be any episode of a standard sitcom -in fact the weekend getaway to a cottage trope has been done plenty in shows like Three’s Company and Frasier. And just like those examples this is a film that runs heavily on farce and misunderstanding, though treated with a little more sincerity. It’s a farce through the lens of an art film. There’s a gag with a bull, an abrasive neighbour, a false pretence, and a close sexual encounter, but also deep shots, a dim atmosphere, and a narration device by an unnamed protagonist (for simplicity’s sake I’m going to identify him as Marwood, which is a name appearing on a telegram in the film). This really reflects the character of Withnail well, who’s both articulately posh and slovenly crass. “I’m a trained actor reduced to the state of a bum!” he exclaims in frustration. Their poor Camden Town flat (not far in geography or state from the fictitious Bob Crachit’s home) is cluttered, filthy, and dilapidated, their car much the same, yet Withnail makes an attempt to look half-decent in his shabby coat and tie. A man from a rich but estranged upbringing, who fancies himself a classical dignified actor, he’s very much living in his own world, looking to things like the country holiday as a solution to his problems rather than the distraction it is. For this reason too, he’s prone to exaggerate his prospects.
Richard E. Grant is stupendous as this drunken idiot-savant of a lead. Not only is he consistently funny and absurd, but there’s a believability to even his most outlandish lines and actions. “We want the finest wines available to humanity,” he orders to a cafe proprietor in Penrith. “We want them here and we want them now.” Every minutia of life is a performance to Withnail and Grant is exceedingly good at conveying that. And considering he’s played a number of similar over-the-top characters since (his Seward of Francis Ford Coppolla’s Dracula being perhaps the most notable example), it’s unsurprising the direction his career took. Paul McGann is essentially the straight man of their double act, but his performance is quietly engaging too. He’s obviously the character you relate with most, having common sense in the face of some of Withnail’s most questionable antics (drinking a can of lighter fluid for instance), but he’s also got enough of a neurotic personality himself to stand out. He’s perhaps at his best in the pub scene early on, with his irrational fear of a burly man calling him “ponce”, played by a scene-stealing Daragh O’Malley. Withnail and I often feels like a movie-length episode of a sitcom, and that’s also noteworthy in the cast of supporting characters including a prescient drug dealer Danny played by Ralph Brown and the gruff country poacher Jake played by Michael Elphick.
And then of course there’s Uncle Monty, owner and surprise guest at the country cabin, played by Richard Griffiths; and though Griffiths isn’t giving a poor performance, it’s his character at the heart of what’s wrong with the movie. Uncle Monty is openly gay, stereotypically so, and one of the key plot points later in the film is his belief that Marwood is gay as well, a misunderstanding which leads to him making very inappropriate advances towards the younger man. Robinson based the character on famed Italian director Franco Zeffirelli, whom he worked for when playing Benvolio in 1968’s Romeo and Juliet. He also alleges that Zeffirelli sexually harassed him in much the same way as Monty is seen to do with Marwood. This personal experience of Robinson’s seems to be the reason why, in contrast to similar misunderstandings in television at the time, on shows like Three’s Company and Are You Being Served?, the rapey overtones of Monty’s advances are played seriously, and with genuine fear on Marwood’s part. It results in Monty being a rather unlikeable character, despite being a sentimentalist -he only ceases his assault after Marwood lies about him and Withnail being lovers. It’s uncomfortable to watch, and especially with Monty already being quite a stereotype, it comes off as slightly homophobic. I’m sure that wasn’t Robinson’s intention -he may have just wanted to raise awareness of Zeffirelli’s creepiness; and he does make a point that this isn’t Monty reading something in Marwood -Withnail directly convinced his uncle Marwood was closeted but curious. However it still has unfortunate connotations.
Withnail and I is a very funny movie, clever and irreverent, but there’s a tragic element to it as well. Withnail’s personality is not entirely treated as a joke. Marwood is implicitly the better actor, but Withnail doesn’t have any discipline to work towards improving that fact for himself. He sulks and moans. He’s managed to get work before -reference is made to a cigar commercial and an agent who has since disappeared. Withnail also believes himself above certain types of jobs, turning down understudy work at perhaps a debilitating cost; he just wallows in the faint hope that a great acting job falls into his lap, something in television hopefully. Marwood gets the lead in a play in Manchester at the end of the movie while Withnail gets an eviction notice. But their parting was inevitable even before this. Withnail and Marwood have a likeable friendship, but while they both display laddish behaviour, you can’t escape the bad influence Withnail is. It’s perhaps at its most embarrassing when after being pulled over for drink driving, Withnail tries pulling a juvenile trick he learned from Danny to fake a urine sample. Regardless, the farewell between Withnail and “I” is still sad in its way. It did feel like a genuine friendship, and as Marwood leaves for a more successful future while Withnail seems doomed to despair, you really pity the guy. As he pathetically and dramatically recites Hamlet’s “what a piece of work is a man” speech with wine bottle ever in hand, it’s all the more an indictment on irresponsible, overly entitled youth. We don’t know if Withnail will find another flat, or how long it will take him to really put in the effort to win an acting job and thus improve his life, if he ever will. Perhaps Robinson is commenting too on the pursuit of acting as a career, how those who are the most passionate can still be left behind.
Withnail may not ever become the star he wanted, but Richard E. Grant did, and Withnail and I definitely became a cult hit for a reason. Apart from its sense of humour, from farce to slapstick to fish-out-of-water confusion (like their attempt to cook a chicken) and an array of terrific lines (“you bloody fool, you should never mix your drinks!”), it boasts memorable characters, some genuine pathos, and a great dirty 60’s atmosphere -according to McGann new audiences sometimes assume it was made two decades earlier. Uncle Monty’s whole subplot is really the only awkward spot on an otherwise marvellous bleak comedy. Clever, funny, honest, and oddly stimulating, Withnail and I is a must-see movie for actors and British film fans alike.

Follow me on Twitter: https://twitter.com/Jordan_D_Bosch 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Strange History of the American Spoof Movie

Parody movies have been around for a lot longer than we tend to think of them. Even from the earliest days of Hollywood there were movies meant to satirize a particular subject or genre. In the silent era, Buster Keaton was responsible for a few. And in the early sound era, almost as soon as the monster pictures took off did you see comic versions of them -Abbott and Costello hosting a few. But parody movies tended to be subtle for most of cinema history, or parody came in conjunction with another goal of the comedy. It really wasn’t until the 1980s and 90s that it took off and became popularly understood. And there is perhaps a line to be drawn to the counterculture comedy explosion that began in the 1970s through avenues like  Saturday Night Live , which frequently parodied from even its earliest years popular movies and cultural properties of the time. But that is still a way’s back. To my generation though, ‘parody movie’ is perhaps a less known term than the more blunt ‘s...

Notes on the Title Cards of The Lord of the Rings

It might be sacrilege for one who both considers The Lord of the Rings  trilogy to be one of the greatest triumphs of cinema and has been an avid lover of the films since adolescence, to declare that the original theatrical cuts of the films are better than the much beloved extended editions. Easily it’s my most controversial opinion regarding these movies. Don’t get me wrong, I do like the extended editions quite a lot, especially as someone who just enjoys spending time in that universe. They flesh it out more, add extra flavour, and in increasing the length by about an hour really emphasize the epic quality of these films. But I find that the original cuts are generally more cleanly paced, more seamlessly edited, and much more accessible to audiences. All the stuff there is to love about The Lord of the Rings  is there in the original versions, the plethora of new and extended scenes merely add to that for fans. And of those, they fall into three camps for me: 1....

Back to the Feature: New York, New York (1977)

New York, New York  is a two hour forty minute musical movie largely about a toxic relationship and I understand why it was Martin Scorsese’s first big flop. Some have blamed its poor reception on the kind of movie it was, of a style and tone Scorsese wasn’t known for, but I find that hard to believe. Even after only five films, he’d proven himself an extremely versatile director, and Alice Doesn’t Live Here Anymore  found an audience. Sure this jazz musical love letter to New York City was following up Taxi Driver and its’ far more cynical take on the city, but then it’s also ‘from the director of Taxi Driver ’ which itself was a big hit. Was it a matter of public appetite for musicals, or mere word of mouth and early critical reception that dissuaded viewers? Irrespective of that, I was stunned to discover this movie was the origin of the titular song, which I’d assumed was much older (it’s definitely got the sound of something that might have come out of the Jazz sce...