Skip to main content

A Zombie Movie About the Human Spirit


Well that was way better than Anon or Fullmetal Alchemist!
Directed by newcomers Yolanda Ramke and Ben Howling, written by Ramke, and based off their 2013 short, Cargo is an Australian zombie apocalypse movie on Netflix that’s one of the platforms’ best original movies so far this year. While it may seem like a traditional zombie movie, it actually does a lot to set itself apart, aiming to be a greater story of survival, endurance, and human nature.
In the aftermath of a typical zombie outbreak, Andy (Martin Freeman) and Katy (Susie Porter) are living on a houseboat in Australia with their infant daughter Rosie. But when an accident leads to Katy becoming infected, it falls on Andy to get their daughter to safety before he too succumbs. Meanwhile, an Aboriginal girl called Thoomi (Simone Landers) whose father is infected, is journeying to her ancestral homeland to reunite with her people, inevitably to meet Andy along the way.
The living dead have very little screen-time in this movie. That’s because Ramke and Howling know their suggestion is more frightening than their presence. But also because the zombies are really incidental to this film. Even the threat to the main characters comes more often from humans -whether in the form or antagonists Andy or Thoomi meet on their journey, or their own instability. The infected people contribute more to a looming terror and as an excuse for how this world operates than anything else. Despite being pretty standard in just how it depicts this breakdown of society, it does try to touch on the baser impulses, both noble and dark, cataclysmic circumstances awaken in human beings. This is reminiscent of course of 28 Days Later, and while Cargo certainly borrows elements from that film and other zombie media including The Walking Dead, where it’s a little bit different is that in addition to portraying people devolving into savagery and abusiveness in an apocalyptic scenario it also shows a person motivated by similar hidden impulses to instinctively do whatever it takes to protect his only child.
Fairly early on in the movie Andy becomes infected by the virus. So for most of the story he’s a dead man walking and he knows it. Because of that, he constantly looks for survivors to take care of Rosie. As his symptoms worsen with each progressive night it becomes more of a struggle to carry on. You vividly feel his pain and determination in all this, his fear he might accidentally hurt his daughter, and of course his suicidal urges. All are illustrated well through the visuals and atmosphere, but Martin Freeman is also just excellent in this film, giving easily one of his best performances. Cargo is a character-driven story, and with this responsibility Freeman more than capably carries the grim emotion and urgency with intensity and compassion. He has a wonderful on-screen partner too in Simone Landers, who’s likewise giving a great performance that compliments his very well. Thoomi’s character is tied very closely to Aboriginal belief and culture as it forms a major part of her own convictions and persistence to save her father. And the movie handles it with a deftness that shows a genuine understanding of her spirituality and values.
There aren’t a lot of surprises in this movie though. It is still a zombie movie after all and hits most of the familiar beats. However the vast Australian wilderness is a compellingly different if slightly unoriginal place to situate it (I mean ever since Mad Max, our go-to apocalypse environment has looked like Australia). But it is a real Australia presented by real Australians concerned with Australian identity. The movie stays fixed in that corner of the world and emphasizes its beauty and desolation alike through great cinematography. I also admire the creativity in the effects of the zombie infection. They’re gory without being typically so, and perhaps a little more unsettling.
Cargo is plodding in places and some of its conventions, even quite dark scenes, aren’t new to zombie fiction. It’s not going to be a staple film of the genre, but it’s nice to have something from that genre feel fresh again. It does have a few unique ideas, a unique lens with which it views this kind of apocalypse, a simple but compelling drive, and a couple performances that keep you invested in the characters’ journey -an especially impressive feat given we know the fate of one of them. It’s a zombie movie that is actually optimistic, and not in a way that we know the main characters are safe at the end, or the virus will be reversed or the infected contained, or anything else that contrived. It’s optimistic in its outlook on humanity, which may be the most refreshing thing Cargo offers. If you like horror movies that double as engaging character dramas, give it a watch.

Follow me on Twitter: https://twitter.com/Jordan_D_Bosch 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Strange History of the American Spoof Movie

Parody movies have been around for a lot longer than we tend to think of them. Even from the earliest days of Hollywood there were movies meant to satirize a particular subject or genre. In the silent era, Buster Keaton was responsible for a few. And in the early sound era, almost as soon as the monster pictures took off did you see comic versions of them -Abbott and Costello hosting a few. But parody movies tended to be subtle for most of cinema history, or parody came in conjunction with another goal of the comedy. It really wasn’t until the 1980s and 90s that it took off and became popularly understood. And there is perhaps a line to be drawn to the counterculture comedy explosion that began in the 1970s through avenues like  Saturday Night Live , which frequently parodied from even its earliest years popular movies and cultural properties of the time. But that is still a way’s back. To my generation though, ‘parody movie’ is perhaps a less known term than the more blunt ‘s...

Notes on the Title Cards of The Lord of the Rings

It might be sacrilege for one who both considers The Lord of the Rings  trilogy to be one of the greatest triumphs of cinema and has been an avid lover of the films since adolescence, to declare that the original theatrical cuts of the films are better than the much beloved extended editions. Easily it’s my most controversial opinion regarding these movies. Don’t get me wrong, I do like the extended editions quite a lot, especially as someone who just enjoys spending time in that universe. They flesh it out more, add extra flavour, and in increasing the length by about an hour really emphasize the epic quality of these films. But I find that the original cuts are generally more cleanly paced, more seamlessly edited, and much more accessible to audiences. All the stuff there is to love about The Lord of the Rings  is there in the original versions, the plethora of new and extended scenes merely add to that for fans. And of those, they fall into three camps for me: 1....

Back to the Feature: New York, New York (1977)

New York, New York  is a two hour forty minute musical movie largely about a toxic relationship and I understand why it was Martin Scorsese’s first big flop. Some have blamed its poor reception on the kind of movie it was, of a style and tone Scorsese wasn’t known for, but I find that hard to believe. Even after only five films, he’d proven himself an extremely versatile director, and Alice Doesn’t Live Here Anymore  found an audience. Sure this jazz musical love letter to New York City was following up Taxi Driver and its’ far more cynical take on the city, but then it’s also ‘from the director of Taxi Driver ’ which itself was a big hit. Was it a matter of public appetite for musicals, or mere word of mouth and early critical reception that dissuaded viewers? Irrespective of that, I was stunned to discover this movie was the origin of the titular song, which I’d assumed was much older (it’s definitely got the sound of something that might have come out of the Jazz sce...