Skip to main content

A Valiant Effort, But in Vain


This review is late. I meant to see this movie two months ago when it first premièred on Netflix, but didn’t get to it before bad word-of-mouth got out. And I had other stuff to do. But I was still curious, and with limited options before Deadpool 2, I figured I should give it the benefit of the doubt.
I’m a relatively recent but nonetheless enthusiastic fan of Fullmetal Alchemist, the animes based on the manga by Hiromu Arakawa. Both series are smart, imaginative, intriguing, and really gripping; and whatever shortcomings there are in one are rectified in the other. I’d recommend them to anyone who’s interested in unique fantasy storytelling or just as a gateway to anime as a whole.
And Japan, as it happens, is just as prone to making live-action movie versions of popular TV shows as we are in the west. Fullmetal Alchemist, directed by Fumihiko Sori, is following in the footsteps of the likes of Attack on Titan, Black Butler, and Death Note. So this was really inevitable. Of course it’s impossible to condense fifty-one to sixty-four episodes faithfully into a two hour movie, so I don’t expect it to be incredibly loyal to plot. But does it adapt enough of the source material well and more importantly, does it stand alone?
In an industrial world governed by loosely medieval notions of alchemy, two prodigy brothers, Edward (Ryosuke Yamada) and Alphonse Elric (Atomo Mizuishi) were seriously scarred in an attempt to use alchemy to bring their mother back to life as children. Now Edward, with a prosthetic arm and leg, and Al, his soul bound to an empty suit of armour, are on a quest to find a philosopher’s stone, the one substance that can restore what was lost of their bodies. In the process they’ve become military State Alchemists, and while searching and researching they come into conflict with indestructible beings called homunculi.
The plot of this movie makes little sense if you’re not familiar with the material. It adapts a handful of plot lines, most from the first third of the story, but doesn’t know how to do so in a coherent way. Because of that there are certain major story flaws. The homunculi still serve a role as main antagonists but they have no motivation for their actions whatsoever. Ultimately they just wind up being obstacles in Edward and Al’s quest. There’s another plot point where a character comes to a conclusion that’s included purely for a famous scene and is never extrapolated on afterwards, making the subsequent development entirely pointless. The same goes for the death of Edward and Al’s mother and their absent father, crucial though it may be, it has no bearing on the direction of this film. Those of us who know Fullmetal Alchemist understand the significance of moments like these, but a newcomer has no chance -they don’t even explain what a chimera is. And much like A Wrinkle in Time those who do love the material aren’t going to be satisfied either. The film has to condense a lot which results in a movie with incredibly rushed pacing. The filmmakers were clearly more concerned with hitting a number of important beats, one after another, than sensibly constructing the narrative.
That being said, the scenes that are loyal are very loyal -to the point where there are a few instances they’re directly imitating the manga. One key scene for example involving an alchemist called Shou Tucker (Yo Oizumi) is depicted with the right level of weight. However, loyalty to the source can be a crutch as well. Sometimes something that works in an anime just doesn’t translate to live-action. This includes some over-the-top gestures, reaction shots, and exaggerated bickering out of nowhere that’s awkward to watch. There’s also a subplot included, a personal crisis for Al, that should have been left out, given how there just isn’t runtime available to give it the drama it deserves.
Because of the elements in focus, the cast is much reduced. Significant characters like Scar, Armstrong, Izumi, half the homuncli, and all of Mustang’s squadron are nowhere to be seen. And as disappointing as that may be for fans it does keep the movie from feeling crowded. In terms of the cast, Yamada’s actually pretty good as Edward. The character’s portrayed with excessive angst (he’s constantly breaking down over his brother), but he also has moments of maturity; and however poorly the character may be written, Yamada’s putting in effort, and especially early on is genuinely having fun. Dean Fujioka is also pretty good as Roy Mustang, Edward’s superior and fan favourite. Ryuta Sato is decent, though sometimes awkward, as Mustang’s friend Hughes. Tsubasa Honda though is too over-the-top as Winry, the Elrics’ friend and mechanic, whose role is significantly larger. In contrast, Hawkeye, one of the best characters from the anime, is so sidelined she’s never even mentioned by name in the movie.
Probably the most obvious weakness is the effects, which range from mildly unconvincing, such as Al and the chimeras, to distractingly bad in the later acts. The alchemy itself is severely underwhelming, lacking any energy or power, and the philosophers stone looks a little too plastic. The film also feels fairly small scale for a story as epic as Fullmetal Alchemist. There are barely any extras, giving the impression that urban centres like Liore and Central are sparsely populated. And the production design in the former was nice, but the action sequence that accompanied its introduction had a bad taste of Dead Men Tell No Tales. The costuming is good though -except for Edward’s hair which I’m not convinced isn’t a wig.
So yeah, Fullmetal Alchemist isn’t good, but to its credit, it’s not as bad as I thought it would be. Where similar adaptations like The Last Airbender and Netflix’s Death Note have been insults to their original shows, this movie’s just lame. It feels like a bunch of fans wanted to re-enact their favourite scenes, and did so semi-competently, then tried to tie them together in two hours in an attempt to make sense. But this film won’t appeal to fans, and as a standalone narrative for newcomers, it’s flimsy at best, completely alienating at worst. Conqueror of Shamballa is still the best Fullmetal Alchemist movie.
Fans of Bleach, you’re next.


Follow me on Twitter: https://twitter.com/Jordan_D_Bosch 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Disney's Mulan, Cultural Appropriation, and Exploitation

I’m late on this one I know. I wasn’t willing to spend thirty bucks back in September for a movie experience I knew was going to be far poorer than if I had paid half that at a theatre. So I waited for it to hit streaming for free to give it a shot. In the meantime I heard that it wasn’t very good, but I remained determined not to skip it entirely, partly out of sympathy for director Niki Caro and partly out of morbid curiosity. Disney’s live-action Mulan  I was actually mildly looking forward to early in the year in spite of my well-documented distaste for this series of creative dead zones by the most powerful media conglomerate on earth. Mulan  was never one of Disney’s classics, a movie extremely of its time in its “girl power” gender politics and with a decidedly American take on ancient Chinese mythology. It got by on a couple good songs and a strong lead, but it was a movie that could be improved upon, and this new version looked like it had the potential to do that, emphasizing

The Hays Code was Bad, Sex in Movies is Good

Don't Look Now (1973) Will Hays, Who Knows About Sex In 1930, former Republican politician and chair of the Motion Picture Association of America Will Hayes introduced a series of self-censorship guidelines for the movie industry in response to a mixture of celebrity scandals and lobbying from the Catholic Church against various ‘immoralities’ creating a perception of Hollywood as corrupt and indecent. The Hays Code, or the Motion Picture Production Code, was formally adopted in 1930, though not stringently enforced until 1934 under the auspices of Joseph Breen. It laid out a careful list of what was and wasn’t acceptable for a film expecting major distribution. It stipulated rules against profanity, the depiction of miscegenation, and offensive portrayals of the clergy, but a lot of it was based around sexual content: “sexual perversion” of any kind was disallowed, as were any opaquely textual or visual allusions to reproduction, and right near the top “No licentious or suggestiv

Pixar Sundays: The Incredibles (2004)

          Brad Bird was already a master by the time he came to Pixar. Not only did he hone his craft as an early director on The Simpsons , but he directed a little animated film for Warner Bros. in 1999, that though not a box office success was loved by critics and quickly grew a cult following. The Iron Giant is now among many people’s favourite animated movies. Likewise, Bird’s feature debut at Pixar, The Incredibles , his own variation of a superhero movie, is often considered one of the studio’s best. And for very good reason, as the most talented director at Pixar shows.            Superheroes were once the world’s greatest crime-fighting force until several lawsuits for collateral damage (and in the case of Mr. Incredible, a hilarious suicide prevention), outlawed their vigilantism. Fifteen years later Mr. Incredible, now living as Bob Parr, has a family with his wife Helen, the former Elastigirl. But Bob, in a combination of mid-life crisis and nostalgia for the old day