Skip to main content

How Much Love Does Simon Earn?


If you were to go off the poster and trailer for Love, Simon you would expect it to be just another stale, sappy teen movie to consign to the same bin as all the other YA adaptations that have been forgotten over the years. But this film, directed by Greg Berlanti and based off of the novel Simon vs. the Homo Sapiens Agenda (a much better title) by Becky Albertalli, knows it’s dealing with fairly new subject matter for a mainstream film, and approaches it with genuine interest and humour.
Simon Spier (Nick Robinson) is a closeted high school student who discovers via his school’s online forum the confession of another anonymous gay teenager. Reaching out under a pseudonym of his own, the two bond and Simon begins to fall for him. But when a classmate discovers their communications and blackmails Simon, he’s forced to meddle in the lives of his friends, while at the same time trying to figure out who his confidant is and when and how he should come out.
Despite the relationship between Simon and his online love interest being a major part of the story, Love, Simon isn’t really a romance as much as a teen drama. The central struggle is Simon’s coming out, which has never really been the subject of a major studio film before. And this movie takes advantage of that by really exploring the psychology and emotions a teenager would go through trying to figure out and accept their sexuality. It’s done in a remarkably mature way. There’s no cheap conflict inserted by making his parents strictly conservative or religious for example, or by suggesting he lives in a very homophobic environment. Generally, he knows most people in his life would accept him. It’s an entirely personal conflict, and insightful for those of us who’ve never had to go through it.
Robinson is fantastic, coming across as a very natural teenager going through a personal crisis. He’s playing a very likeable character too, who’s easy to empathize with. He does some bad things as he’s forced to, but you understand his reasons. His trio of friends played by Katherine Langford, Alexandra Shipp, and Jorge Lendeborg Jr. are really likeable, believable characters too. His parents are played by Jennifer Garner and Josh Duhamel, both of whom are fine, and Tony Hale has a minor role as the strange school principal. The only drawback in the cast is Logan Miller as Martin, the blackmailer; unfortunately he’s in the movie a lot and is utterly insufferable. Apart from being way too old to be playing a high schooler, Miller’s character is a monumentally irritating, insecure, selfish jerk and he plays the part way too well. I knew this guy in college, and it’s not a fun personality to be around. Every moment he’s on screen is agonizing. He got increasingly more grating as the film went on, even with an attempt to garner a shred of sympathy for him. It didn’t work. And ultimately, he alone is what keeps the movie from being great.
This film is very clearly inspired by teen movies of the 80s such as the John Hughes catalogue. Like some of those films, it handles its multiple plot-lines deftly and the performances are very natural to how teens in high school behave. But also, it too has a great sense of humour. The narration structure of the film, taken from Simon’s messages, acts as a good inlet to his mind -allowing us to see him picturing various classmates he suspects to be on the other end. But it also gives way to some funny wanderings of the mind and fantasies, such as what it would be like to be gay in college or if straight people had to come out of the closet too. He also has some very funny thoughts and remarks at the expense of awkward situations and characters. None of these are very big laughs, but they work to keep the film energized and upbeat. As to the comparisons to Hughes, I still think 2016’s Edge of Seventeen was closer at least in spirit due to its commitment to honest youth. Love, Simon isn’t unrealistic; the characters swear and make sexual references like real teenagers. But parts of the narrative and character actions just don’t quite ring true to life. There’s a very clear, basic moral to the story, a couple cartoonishly homophobic bullies, a somewhat clichéd breaking up, and an ending that’s perhaps a bit too saccharine.
But that ending is sweet and deserved, and it’s made clear in the script itself that Love, Simon just wants to give its gay protagonist the same kind of story straight people have gotten for decades. It’s a testament to the movie’s dedication, that it wound up being better than most of those comparable movies. And it’s definitely one every closeted teen should see. 
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Strange History of the American Spoof Movie

Parody movies have been around for a lot longer than we tend to think of them. Even from the earliest days of Hollywood there were movies meant to satirize a particular subject or genre. In the silent era, Buster Keaton was responsible for a few. And in the early sound era, almost as soon as the monster pictures took off did you see comic versions of them -Abbott and Costello hosting a few. But parody movies tended to be subtle for most of cinema history, or parody came in conjunction with another goal of the comedy. It really wasn’t until the 1980s and 90s that it took off and became popularly understood. And there is perhaps a line to be drawn to the counterculture comedy explosion that began in the 1970s through avenues like  Saturday Night Live , which frequently parodied from even its earliest years popular movies and cultural properties of the time. But that is still a way’s back. To my generation though, ‘parody movie’ is perhaps a less known term than the more blunt ‘s...
Post a Comment
Read more

A Stylish and Charmingly Reinvented David Copperfield

The Personal History, Adventures, Experience and Observation of David Copperfield the Younger of Blunderstone Rookery (Which He Never Meant to Publish on Any Account)  is the most important book Charles Dickens ever wrote. It is not the most famous or influential by any means (that would of course be A Christmas Carol ), but it is the book that is the purest expression of the authors’ style, identity, and worldview. It is his most personal work, semi-autobiographical in its story of the chronology from infancy to adulthood of a character who overcomes great loss and hardships to find a fulfilling life as a writer. To read David Copperfield  is to understand Dickens himself. Armando Iannucci knew this when he decided to make a new adaptation of the novel for a twenty-first century audience. He also knew that Dickens adaptations are ubiquitous at this point. Films are a bit rarer, but every few years a new television adaptation rears its head to keep the authors’ unique world an...
Post a Comment
Read more

Notes on the Title Cards of The Lord of the Rings

It might be sacrilege for one who both considers The Lord of the Rings  trilogy to be one of the greatest triumphs of cinema and has been an avid lover of the films since adolescence, to declare that the original theatrical cuts of the films are better than the much beloved extended editions. Easily it’s my most controversial opinion regarding these movies. Don’t get me wrong, I do like the extended editions quite a lot, especially as someone who just enjoys spending time in that universe. They flesh it out more, add extra flavour, and in increasing the length by about an hour really emphasize the epic quality of these films. But I find that the original cuts are generally more cleanly paced, more seamlessly edited, and much more accessible to audiences. All the stuff there is to love about The Lord of the Rings  is there in the original versions, the plethora of new and extended scenes merely add to that for fans. And of those, they fall into three camps for me: 1....
1 comment
Read more