Skip to main content

The Florida Project Magnifies the Magical Impoverished


In societies of relative luxury, there is always a problem of people ignoring poverty. For some of us in our day to day lives, it’s easy to forget there are people living all around us, only getting by from paycheck to paycheck, if that. The Florida Project, from Tangerine director Sean Baker, is all about gleaming humanity out of such marginalized people and drawing attention to their lives from the youngest vantage point -punctuating the social disparity by setting their story just outside the “Happiest Place on Earth”.
Moonee (Brooklyn Prince) lives out of a hotel room in the obnoxiously kitschy town of Kissimmee, Florida a few miles down the highway from Walt Disney World, with her grossly negligent mother Halley (Bria Vinaite). She spends most of her days wandering around unsupervised with the other hotel kids, generally being a delinquent. The only person who seems to care for her well-being is the gruff manager Bobby (Willem Dafoe) who’s often impatient with Halley’s behaviour though sympathetic to her struggle to pay rent.
As with many slice-of-life movies like this, there’s not much of a traditional plot, and focus meanders from time to time to just show the routine and lifestyle of Moonee and Halley. But there is direction; certain trivial (and a couple very non-trivial) incidents do have consequences, such as resulting in one of the friends being suspended by their parent from playing with the others due to their bad influence. There are arcs for the characters woven through these moments too, whether of positive or negative development for both of the films’ leads. Their lives are very tough, and there are in fact, some rough moments to watch, particularly related to Halley’s decisions. Moonee, and the other kids to a lesser extent, are the focal point though, much of the movie being seen through their eyes, and it’s illustrated quite well through a number of scenes where significant moments for the adults are played in the background and can only barely be heard while the kids are watching T.V. or doing something else. There’s also a significant strain of optimism to their lives; despite their meagre situation, they are determined to find enjoyment in every activity.
Arguably the biggest risk of this movie was the fact that most of the cast are first-time actors. With the exception of Dafoe and Caleb Landry Jones who plays his son (kind of a pointless part for an actor like Jones), no one in the cast was an actor, and in fact like Beasts of the Southern Wild, many were plucked right from the area the film was shot in. And for a first-time performer, Bria Vinaite is pretty remarkable at portraying this aggravatingly irresponsible mother. She’s adept at playing both the reckless ignorant loose canon set on what seems to be a permanent downward spiral, and the desperate young woman who genuinely loves her daughter, but doesn’t have any interest in being a parent. As for that daughter, Brooklyn Prince is believable enough. I’m curious how much of her dialogue was scripted, because a lot of the time her rambling conversations with her friends feel extremely natural to how a kid her age would interact. I wonder whether in these scenes she and the other kids were ad-libbing based on cues or if it was all written by credited writers Baker and Chris Bergoch. If the latter, then I’m especially impressed with her performance. She can get grating at times to listen to, her behaviour often intentionally irritating, but the film never lets you believe its the result of anything other than her circumstances. Willem Dafoes’ performance is unsurprisingly the best. He’s brilliantly subtle all through the movie with a care-worn face and sympathetic nature that’s a good relief against the feelings of depression skirting the protagonists.
For its’ scenes of unvarnished poverty, The Florida Project actually manages to be a lush movie. It’s cinematography is very striking with a lot of over-saturated colours and rich lighting. It captures the mood of childhood late summers really well by following the kids around in continuous takes from their level, or just lingering on a particularly evocative moment, like when Moonee and Halley watch fireworks, or when Bobby just gazes towards the highway from the hotel with a breeze in his hair at dusk. Though Disney World’s screentime in this movie is very minimal, it never lets you forget the looming presence of the grand resort not far from where these characters are living in squalor. Disney is referenced by a lot of the tacky buildings the kids hang around, a brief scene features a Brazilian couple having mistaken the hotel (The Magic Castle) for the Magic Kingdom, and Halley gets some trouble after stealing someone’s wristband passes to sell off. The very fact the film is called The Florida Project (the original working name for Disney World) makes clear the intended commentary on the disenfranchised often existing in the shadow of great opulence.
This movie is not especially new. Similar themes relating to economic destitution in Florida and irresponsible parenting were a major part of last years’ Moonlight, while other areas of the film evoke older minimalist works like Terence Malick’s Days of Heaven (notably the exceptionally well-done ending). But The Florida Project is enticing, intelligent, and bold, worth seeing for both its unfiltered humanism and its sparks of hope.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Strange History of the American Spoof Movie

Parody movies have been around for a lot longer than we tend to think of them. Even from the earliest days of Hollywood there were movies meant to satirize a particular subject or genre. In the silent era, Buster Keaton was responsible for a few. And in the early sound era, almost as soon as the monster pictures took off did you see comic versions of them -Abbott and Costello hosting a few. But parody movies tended to be subtle for most of cinema history, or parody came in conjunction with another goal of the comedy. It really wasn’t until the 1980s and 90s that it took off and became popularly understood. And there is perhaps a line to be drawn to the counterculture comedy explosion that began in the 1970s through avenues like  Saturday Night Live , which frequently parodied from even its earliest years popular movies and cultural properties of the time. But that is still a way’s back. To my generation though, ‘parody movie’ is perhaps a less known term than the more blunt ‘s...
Post a Comment
Read more

A Stylish and Charmingly Reinvented David Copperfield

The Personal History, Adventures, Experience and Observation of David Copperfield the Younger of Blunderstone Rookery (Which He Never Meant to Publish on Any Account)  is the most important book Charles Dickens ever wrote. It is not the most famous or influential by any means (that would of course be A Christmas Carol ), but it is the book that is the purest expression of the authors’ style, identity, and worldview. It is his most personal work, semi-autobiographical in its story of the chronology from infancy to adulthood of a character who overcomes great loss and hardships to find a fulfilling life as a writer. To read David Copperfield  is to understand Dickens himself. Armando Iannucci knew this when he decided to make a new adaptation of the novel for a twenty-first century audience. He also knew that Dickens adaptations are ubiquitous at this point. Films are a bit rarer, but every few years a new television adaptation rears its head to keep the authors’ unique world an...
Post a Comment
Read more

Notes on the Title Cards of The Lord of the Rings

It might be sacrilege for one who both considers The Lord of the Rings  trilogy to be one of the greatest triumphs of cinema and has been an avid lover of the films since adolescence, to declare that the original theatrical cuts of the films are better than the much beloved extended editions. Easily it’s my most controversial opinion regarding these movies. Don’t get me wrong, I do like the extended editions quite a lot, especially as someone who just enjoys spending time in that universe. They flesh it out more, add extra flavour, and in increasing the length by about an hour really emphasize the epic quality of these films. But I find that the original cuts are generally more cleanly paced, more seamlessly edited, and much more accessible to audiences. All the stuff there is to love about The Lord of the Rings  is there in the original versions, the plethora of new and extended scenes merely add to that for fans. And of those, they fall into three camps for me: 1....
1 comment
Read more