Skip to main content

An Inferior Haunting


The Winchester Mystery House of San Jose is one of the most famous haunted mansions in North America. Built by the daughter-in-law of the man who invented the Winchester rifle, many claimed it was haunted by the ghosts of the people killed by those weapons. Looming and vast, it’s been a progenitor or inspiration behind countless haunted house stories including Shirley Jackson’s classic The Haunting of Hill House and even Disney’s Haunted Mansion.
Seems like the perfect subject matter to give to the directors of Jigsaw doesn’t it?
In 1906, Doctor Eric Price (Jason Clarke) is sent to San Jose to diagnose the eccentric heiress Sarah Winchester (Helen Mirren) and determine if she is mentally well after a series of bizarre behaviours. When he arrives at the mansion she’s rebuilding, she reveals her communication with spirits as these same ghosts in the house begin to haunt him as well.
Winchester is an extremely formulaic horror movie. The plot is absolutely banal and really cheesy the further in it gets; the characters are paper thin and the dialogue insipid. The idea of ghosts haunting a family who just happened to invent the specific firearm that killed them is already a little lame, and the movie’s additional plotting doesn’t help this any, because it falls back on too many tropes. For example, there’s a kid in this movie, which of course means he has to spend whole scenes possessed by a spirit, and all the times he’s not he can never act like a regular kid. The reveal of this possession early on also shows the movie’s utter lack of imagination, as the boy is seen walking around with a bag on his head and when the mother removes it there’s nothing at all odd about him except that his irises are white. This movie has no sense of mood it’s not stealing from a hundred other horror movies that do it better. Worst of all, there are no good scares and only lazily constructed suspense; it relies far too much on fake-outs and cheap jump scares -and the jump scares are so quick you don’t even register what they are over the obnoxious musical cue and swift lighting adjustment that accompanies every single one.
The one thing that’s really salvaged in this movie is Helen Mirren’s performance. But Helen Mirren is Helen Mirren and she’d have to try to give a bad performance. She spends the entire film in a black gown and veil of mourning as a symbol of the grief over her lost husband and son, as though she were a subverted Miss Havisham -which wasn’t true of the real Sarah Winchester. Her character can often be annoying and irrational, which is the point, but it nonetheless makes her very hard to invest in. Jason Clarke gives a decent performance, but he doesn’t quite have the talent to pull through this lesser material. The writers try to give his character a backstory relating to the main plot about the guilt he has over the death of his wife, but it’s never substantive enough for you to care. He mostly exists to be the typical sceptic object of jump scares as he wanders the place at night for no real reason. None of the other actors leave any imprint and for the most part aren’t very good.
All of these are par for the course for bad horror movies, but what irritates me is that this is a haunted house story, and one with a lot of potential. Given the legacy of the Winchester there’s a lot that could be done, and it deserved way more effort put in. Because that’s the biggest crime of this movie: there’s no effort. This could have been something as compellingly spooky as The Haunting (based on the aforementioned Jackson novel), incorporating psychological neuroses in its characters and claustrophobic cinematography in its presentation to make for a truly unnerving film. It should at least have been Crimson Peak. But it never attempts to make the Winchester itself scary, just the supernatural figures it places in it, and that’s not enough. Not everyone believes ghosts are real, but the Winchester House certainly is.
Parts of this movie were actually filmed at the Winchester House, which at least makes me more curious to see it. It’s bound to be more interesting than this movie, which is ultimately just another glaringly dull, instantly forgettable horror flick, recycling clich├ęs and resorting to the same old shoddy plot devices. Like The Conjuring, Winchester opens with an assertion it’s inspired by true events, but I for one refuse to believe reality is that contrived.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Two Steps Forward, Ten Steps Back: The 91st Academy Awards

If all publicity is good publicity than the 91st Academy Awards should have been the highest rated yet. Because in their desperation to draw in more audiences they made some truly baffling decisions that have caught the attention of the public and garnered heavy controversy. There was the stupid and condescending “Best Popular Film” debacle, Kevin Hart stepping down from the hosting gig amidst controversy surrounding homophobic jokes, the subsequent decision to do away with a host entirely this year for the first time since 1989, and the decision to cut four categories (Cinematography, Editing, Makeup & Hairstyling, and Live-Action Short) from the broadcast, only to restore them after near universal criticism from the film community on this move. Each of these proposed changes backfired drastically, making the Academy look like they either don’t know what they’re doing, or more depressingly, don’t actually care about celebrating film any more as much as appealing to the desired de…

20 Years of the World of Tomorrow

Certain media, if it hits you at the right time, has a way of impacting you in lasting, even formative ways. Perhaps it can help shape your sensibilities and your understanding of the world. Or maybe it can just revitalize your interest in a genre in a completely new way by showing you how dynamic that genre really is. There have been a handful of such media in my life, and one of them has been Futurama. Since discovering it,  I have seen T.V. animation that has been more challenging, more artistically impressive, and more revolutionary, but Futurama remains my personal favourite animated series. That’s not to say the show is without its’ feats of quality. Indeed, Futurama is still one of the smartest comedy series I’ve ever seen and perhaps the most consistently creative. Its’ fans know just how quotable it is, and few sitcoms have earned their emotional peaks so well. Futurama was already set in the future when it first aired on March 28th 1999, nine months ahead of when its lead char…

Ten Essential Silent Films Millennial Movie Fans Must See

I hope that title doesn’t come across as condescending.  The thing is, most of us born into an era of sound film have seen few, if any, silent movies. The early days of cinema may have produced some films that don’t stand up today, but it was also an era of new possibilities, new stories, experimentation, and boldness unlike anything that would succeed it. To the general public though, and even some movie fans today, it’s defined more by its limitations than anything else: its’ lack of colour, lack of dialogue, difference in its style of acting, directing, and visual effects. And for this people avoid them or consider them inferior to the nine decades’ worth of talking pictures we’ve grown accustomed to. But silent cinema isn’t just an important part of the history of film; it offers profound insight into the art form itself. By watching the beginnings of narrative techniques, radical technical innovations and daring chances that couldn’t be taken today, it fosters a better appreciatio…