Skip to main content

Why to Look Out for Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri


The relationship between the public and the police is one of the major things under scrutiny in Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri, a film which is ruthlessly brutal and affecting. It’s directed by Martin McDonagh whose previous films, the fantastic In Bruges, and the pretty good Seven Psychopaths, are known for combining serious, usually lethal actions, with black comedy. And while there is a darkly comic edge to this film, it’s by far his most serious project, and his most excellent.
Mildred Hayes (Frances McDormand), in an effort to raise awareness and reopen the rape-murder case of her daughter, pays for three billboards outside the town of Ebbing, Missouri that explicitly shame the law enforcement for not solving it. This is met with backlash considering the billboards specifically attack Chief Bill Willoughby (Woody Harrelson), who in addition to being a well-liked figure in the community, is suffering from terminal cancer. The film focuses on Mildred becoming a pariah because of this, and the impact it has on the town, the police force, and herself.
Mildred Hayes is Frances McDormand’s single greatest character since Fargo. She’s fierce, determined, resilient, and fearless, as she speaks her mind authoritatively and defends herself ferociously. But at the same time she’s a grieving and frustrated mother, remorseful over her antagonistic relationship with her daughter when she was alive. McDormand is of course terrific at Mildred’s wit, but also conveys an extremely hurt person, who’s been through a lot, even before the murder. She’s a rich and compelling protagonist who you sympathize with, but she’s complex in her actions, often going to extreme measures that you can’t justify. But it makes her all the more human and interesting. And no one could have played this part like McDormand who may well win her second Oscar for it. Woody Harrelson is great too. It would have been easy to make his character a corrupt or uncaring cop, in perfect synch with the implication Mildred perpetuates with her billboards. But he’s actually a genuinely caring guy, unfairly targeted, and with a great sense of humour. McDonagh reunites with another Seven Psychopaths star, as Sam Rockwell plays Willoughby’s subordinate Officer Dixon; and Rockwell proves here why he’s one of the most underrated character actors. Though Dixon initially appears to be a comic relief idiot cop with a possibly racist past and capable of being a real scumbag, his arc is taken in some unpredictable directions, and Rockwell turns out one of his all-time greatest performances. The supporting cast is full of good actors too, as Lucas Hedges from Manchester by the Sea delivers exceptionally as Mildred’s son, who’s also offended by the billboards; and John Hawkes is quite good as her ex-husband. There are also good turns from Abbie Cornish, Caleb Landry Jones, Clarke Peters, and a surprising Peter Dinklage.
The subject matter of this movie is certainly difficult, but it’s well-handled. Because as with most of his scripts, McDonagh injects a great degree of personality into his writing. The comic moments don’t detract from the heavily serious scenes, instead they flow rather seamlessly. The dialogue is very clever and honest to character. And McDonagh has such an understanding of this that he’s willing to go to some very tough places, like in one monologue Mildred delivers to a priest for example, that’s terrifically composed yet utterly venomous. It gets across a very blunt point and the whole story is really quite pointed. This is a veritably socially conscious film in the way it examines the relationship Mildred has with the police. While the people of Ebbing generally respect their department, Mildred is more cynical and perfectly willing to call them out. Other moments highlight, for serious or comic effect, a lack of accountability; and there’s a very modern commentary underlining the film in the way it discusses and alludes to rape and sexual abuse, and how law enforcement deals with them.
Carter Burwell’s score is great, the atmosphere is really nailed, and the way the movie ultimately ends is not what you’d expect, proving much more intelligent, realistic, and evocative than what’s typically anticipated. Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri is an outstanding film, and though it surely has a few flaws, they don’t readily present themselves. It’s a movie that forces you into the shoes of someone who’s lost so much and is fed up with feeling powerless, and it whole-heartedly earns your investment. With a brilliant screenplay by a brilliant director, an original story that’s focussed and relentless, and engaging characters portrayed by a radiant cast led by Frances McDormand at her finest, this is certainly not the last you’ll be hearing of Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Strange History of the American Spoof Movie

Parody movies have been around for a lot longer than we tend to think of them. Even from the earliest days of Hollywood there were movies meant to satirize a particular subject or genre. In the silent era, Buster Keaton was responsible for a few. And in the early sound era, almost as soon as the monster pictures took off did you see comic versions of them -Abbott and Costello hosting a few. But parody movies tended to be subtle for most of cinema history, or parody came in conjunction with another goal of the comedy. It really wasn’t until the 1980s and 90s that it took off and became popularly understood. And there is perhaps a line to be drawn to the counterculture comedy explosion that began in the 1970s through avenues like  Saturday Night Live , which frequently parodied from even its earliest years popular movies and cultural properties of the time. But that is still a way’s back. To my generation though, ‘parody movie’ is perhaps a less known term than the more blunt ‘s...

Notes on the Title Cards of The Lord of the Rings

It might be sacrilege for one who both considers The Lord of the Rings  trilogy to be one of the greatest triumphs of cinema and has been an avid lover of the films since adolescence, to declare that the original theatrical cuts of the films are better than the much beloved extended editions. Easily it’s my most controversial opinion regarding these movies. Don’t get me wrong, I do like the extended editions quite a lot, especially as someone who just enjoys spending time in that universe. They flesh it out more, add extra flavour, and in increasing the length by about an hour really emphasize the epic quality of these films. But I find that the original cuts are generally more cleanly paced, more seamlessly edited, and much more accessible to audiences. All the stuff there is to love about The Lord of the Rings  is there in the original versions, the plethora of new and extended scenes merely add to that for fans. And of those, they fall into three camps for me: 1....

Back to the Feature: New York, New York (1977)

New York, New York  is a two hour forty minute musical movie largely about a toxic relationship and I understand why it was Martin Scorsese’s first big flop. Some have blamed its poor reception on the kind of movie it was, of a style and tone Scorsese wasn’t known for, but I find that hard to believe. Even after only five films, he’d proven himself an extremely versatile director, and Alice Doesn’t Live Here Anymore  found an audience. Sure this jazz musical love letter to New York City was following up Taxi Driver and its’ far more cynical take on the city, but then it’s also ‘from the director of Taxi Driver ’ which itself was a big hit. Was it a matter of public appetite for musicals, or mere word of mouth and early critical reception that dissuaded viewers? Irrespective of that, I was stunned to discover this movie was the origin of the titular song, which I’d assumed was much older (it’s definitely got the sound of something that might have come out of the Jazz sce...