Skip to main content

Star Wars Takes Bold New Steps in the Right Direction


So far, the second chapter in a Star Wars trilogy is the one that tries to be darker, more ambitious, and even a little hopeless for its protagonists, often who’ve spent the movie apart. This has amounted to mixed results, with Empire Strikes Back frequently being cited as the greatest Star Wars movie, while Attack of the Clones is quite clearly the worst. A significant component of Joseph Campbell’s Hero Journey, Rian Johnson abides by this pattern too with The Last Jedi, but consciously pushes further, creating a film that has some shadows of its predecessors while thoroughly charting a compelling new direction for this universe and mythology.
Set directly after The Force Awakens, the Resistance fighters led by General Leia (Carrie Fisher) are evacuating their base as the First Order pursues, only to find their enemies are somehow able to track them through light-speed. Covertly on orders from Poe Dameron (Oscar Isaac), Finn (John Boyega) and Rose (Kelly Marie Tran), a tenacious young maintenance worker, go on a quest to find help to this end. Meanwhile, Rey (Daisy Ridley) having found Luke Skywalker (Mark Hamill) a cynical hermit who’s lost his faith in the Force, she tries to persuade him to come to their rescue as well as teach her in the ways of the Jedi -an order he would rather have end. All the while she feels a strange connection to her adversary Kylo Ren (Adam Driver) and as they each try to turn the other, they discover dark secrets and new facets of the Force.
This is the first Star Wars film to visualize the sensation of using the Force, which is remarkable; but not only that, it explores new avenues and ideas about it. The subtle distinction between light and dark is emphasized, new ways of manipulating it are revealed, and you can understand Luke’s new agnostic philosophy about it. Through Luke, the film actually strips away some of the glorified veneer of the Jedi and makes a decent argument against the importance of their order.
But the real morally grey aspects of this are in the characters. I particularly love how the battle of good and evil isn’t between Rey and Kylo Ren but rather it’s internally within each of them. Their relationship is one of the central tenets of the movie and its fascinating. Both are broken people, made that way through similar figures in their lives, and see a kindred spirit in the other. And it legitimately keeps you guessing who will turn who, both seeming equally susceptible and resilient alike. It certainly solidifies Rey as one of the most interesting and human protagonists of this saga, and without a doubt Kylo Ren is its most complex and conflicted villain.
Daisy Ridley and Adam Driver, the latter especially, give tremendous performances, exceeding their work in The Force Awakens and showcasing how capable they are as performers. Each portray the emotional vulnerability of their characters brilliantly and with heavy weight. With a lot more to do, Mark Hamill is astoundingly impressive as well. He’s a very different Luke from the one we last saw in Return of the Jedi, but he’s believable, powerful, and with a better sense of humour than I think the character’s ever displayed. And he’s the best part of almost every scene he’s in, completely earning the sheer presence he conveys. Also great is the late Carrie Fisher in her final film role, hitting that ideal medium of fierce commander and motherly support. She even has a couple Carrie Fisher-isms and one heartbreaking scene late in the film. I was pleasantly surprised that Poe got his own arc in this movie, Oscar Isaac delivering very well on that front. John Boyega plays Finn with just as much endearing and charismatic personality as he had in The Force Awakens, and newcomer Kelly Marie Tran makes for a wonderful companion. She’s plucky and likeable, and an all-round great addition to the ensemble. Andy Serkis gives a little more venom to his performance as Snoke, appearing in person this time and with much better effects. Domhnall Gleeson is still hammy as General Hux but I’m a little disappointed his character isn’t built on much. The same can be said for Gwendoline Christie’s Captain Phasma. Laura Dern appears as a Resistance officer tying in closely to Poe’s story, and Benicio del Toro is alright, if a bit weirdly spoken, as a thuggish character whom Finn and Rose run into.
However, a few of the story detours crowd this movie a little as a lot goes on. There’s an extended sequence that takes place in a casino that’s a bit of a drag and where the weakest effects are situated. Also, there’s some poor editing at a number of points, particularly the transitions between storylines. But though the story structure itself has weak spots, the plot is very strong, driven as it is by character and theme. Unlike The Force Awakens, the plot of which was essentially a loose retread of A New Hope, this movie is certainly more original. There are familiar beats, motifs, and a couple scenes that are direct parallels to ones from Empire Strikes Back and Return of the Jedi, but the intent of the scenes and their overall direction for the story and characters are vastly different. It addresses a few difficult issues too, like when Finn and Rose learn the extent of war profiteering in the galaxy.
The effects are generally quite good, with a few exceptions. None of the creatures in the aforementioned casino scene look all that great. The Porgs never quite feel tangible, but the worry they’d be as juvenile or obnoxious as Ewoks or Gungans is unwarranted, for they appear with sparsity and don’t play any significant part in the action. Which is good, because the action scenes, the space battles mostly, are some of the franchises’ best. They feel legitimately rough and tense, the major one early on particularly so. Once again, this is a universe that feels lived in, some of the ships being shabby and old. The worlds are well rendered, Crait near the end for example has an incredibly creative geographical characteristic. And to that, this movie is perhaps shot with more skill and grace than any other Star Wars film. The hand to hand conflicts are dazzling too, the main lightsabre battle of the picture having a lot of terrific energy to it, without resorting to the over-the-top acrobatics of the prequels.
One of the biggest themes of this movie is breaking from the past, “burying it” as one character notes. And it’s easy to see this metaphor applying to The Last Jedi and the Star Wars franchise itself. The mistakes of the old ways are consistently brought up, but there’s no complete dismissal of the values of the past, the values that define this series. The Last Jedi is not ashamed of its past, indeed it clearly loves it a lot; but this film nevertheless is willing to boldly venture into new territory, and take chances to enrich the storytelling versatility of Star Wars, as well as expand the epic and mystical nature of this galaxy far far away.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Strange History of the American Spoof Movie

Parody movies have been around for a lot longer than we tend to think of them. Even from the earliest days of Hollywood there were movies meant to satirize a particular subject or genre. In the silent era, Buster Keaton was responsible for a few. And in the early sound era, almost as soon as the monster pictures took off did you see comic versions of them -Abbott and Costello hosting a few. But parody movies tended to be subtle for most of cinema history, or parody came in conjunction with another goal of the comedy. It really wasn’t until the 1980s and 90s that it took off and became popularly understood. And there is perhaps a line to be drawn to the counterculture comedy explosion that began in the 1970s through avenues like  Saturday Night Live , which frequently parodied from even its earliest years popular movies and cultural properties of the time. But that is still a way’s back. To my generation though, ‘parody movie’ is perhaps a less known term than the more blunt ‘s...

Notes on the Title Cards of The Lord of the Rings

It might be sacrilege for one who both considers The Lord of the Rings  trilogy to be one of the greatest triumphs of cinema and has been an avid lover of the films since adolescence, to declare that the original theatrical cuts of the films are better than the much beloved extended editions. Easily it’s my most controversial opinion regarding these movies. Don’t get me wrong, I do like the extended editions quite a lot, especially as someone who just enjoys spending time in that universe. They flesh it out more, add extra flavour, and in increasing the length by about an hour really emphasize the epic quality of these films. But I find that the original cuts are generally more cleanly paced, more seamlessly edited, and much more accessible to audiences. All the stuff there is to love about The Lord of the Rings  is there in the original versions, the plethora of new and extended scenes merely add to that for fans. And of those, they fall into three camps for me: 1....

Back to the Feature: New York, New York (1977)

New York, New York  is a two hour forty minute musical movie largely about a toxic relationship and I understand why it was Martin Scorsese’s first big flop. Some have blamed its poor reception on the kind of movie it was, of a style and tone Scorsese wasn’t known for, but I find that hard to believe. Even after only five films, he’d proven himself an extremely versatile director, and Alice Doesn’t Live Here Anymore  found an audience. Sure this jazz musical love letter to New York City was following up Taxi Driver and its’ far more cynical take on the city, but then it’s also ‘from the director of Taxi Driver ’ which itself was a big hit. Was it a matter of public appetite for musicals, or mere word of mouth and early critical reception that dissuaded viewers? Irrespective of that, I was stunned to discover this movie was the origin of the titular song, which I’d assumed was much older (it’s definitely got the sound of something that might have come out of the Jazz sce...