Skip to main content

Richard Linklater Pays Tribute to Military Service


The title of Last Flag Flying sounds unfortunately like the kind of thing you’d hear at the RNC or worse still, a Trump rally. It’s a phrase that seems to imply that kind of nationalistic nonsense about how the American flag and their military need to be glorified that leads to a distorted sense of values. This movie could almost be a propaganda piece. But it’s not; in fact it actually criticizes these very notions while remarkably at the same time being a genuinely patriotic love letter to the U.S. military and its veterans.
And no less is expected from a master filmmaker like Richard Linklater. Here, he tells a very heartfelt story about three veterans and their relationship, both good and bad, to the institution that changed their lives.
Set in 2003, Vietnam vet Larry “Doc” Shepherd (Steve Carrell) has recently lost his son in Iraq and seeks out his old military buddies to accompany him to the funeral. Sal Nealon (Bryan Cranston) is a crass alcoholic running a shoddy bar in Virginia, while Richard “the Mauler” Mueller (Laurence Fishburne), notorious for his vices in his younger days, is now a pastor. When the trio arrive at the wake and learn that the military lied to Doc about the circumstances of his sons’ death, they decide to take the casket themselves back to Portsmouth, New Hampshire to bury Doc’s son at home.
The book this movie’s based on by Darryl Ponicsan (who also co-wrote the screenplay with Linklater) is the sequel to The Last Detail which itself was made into a movie in 1973. However this film is not a sequel to that one. This movie is fairly self-contained and all the references to these characters’ service in Vietnam work merely as allusions that don’t need to be seen first-hand, or conscious parallels with the war in Iraq. And we learn a lot about the characters this way, their past, and how they’ve gotten to where they are in life. There’s some pretty heavy stuff in this, such as their attempts to reconcile an incident that led to the death of a friend and Doc’s discharge during the final years of the war. But at the same time, Last Flag Flying is a road trip movie and naturally has quite a sense of humour, both in the strange though believable detours in their journey, but mostly in their interactions.
This film really succeeds on the chemistry of its three lead actors and how well-written their characters are. Carrell continues to impress with Doc being one of his best dramatic performances. It’s amazing to think in the same year he played the over-the-top charismatic showman of Bobby Riggs, he also played this timid, awkward and soft-spoken but frustrated father, and was really great in both roles. He carries the emotional weight very well, one of the best moments being his reaction to seeing his sons’ body. Cranston is pretty great too as the immature Sal, a type of brash, pathetic character I don’t think I’ve ever seen him play. And he really gives his all to it. His best moments are the ones he shares with Fishburne, the disparity of their ideals and beliefs making for a lot of fun banter. And not only is Fishburne impeccable as well, but it’s refreshing to see a pastor character portrayed like a real person rather than as one extreme or another. He’s devout and a tad pious sure, but he also gradually comes out of his shell over the course of the story, sharing in an occasional off-colour remark, joke, or memory. The film also features a revelatory performance from J. Quinton Johnson, who’d had a minor role in Linklater’s previous film Everybody Wants Some!!, but here gets plenty of opportunity to shine as a friend of Doc’s son and sometimes companion of the trio; as well as Cicely Tyson lighting up the screen for a short scene. Yul Vazquez plays a colonel in conflict with Doc’s decision who at one point turns into a needless villain and is definitely the movie’s most notable shortcoming.
Vazquez acts as the face of military though which needs to be present. Last Flag Flying comments subtly on the treatment of veterans, but is more critical of the establishment’s public relations. There’s an emphasis put on the red tape Doc has to go through to get his son’s body, as well as the military’s attempt to interfere with the funeral. A light is also shed on the stories the government gives to families of the dead. Doc is told his son died in an ambush saving his fellow troops when the truth is quite a bit different and less conventionally heroic. Sal, who has a particular dislike for authority figures, makes a statement about how the military owes it to the families of the dead to be truthful. But this movie’s smart enough to know that sometimes the lie is necessary, as is illustrated wonderfully later on. The overarching theme is still one of accountability, but it understands the nuances of that. And while this does make for a message that appears a little jumbled, it manages to resonate through because of this movie’s resolute refusal to take one side or the other.
Last Flag Flying is a compelling look into the complicated relationship between veterans and the military, but it’s also a rich character journey for three really engaging people. Linklater is a natural at honest storytelling, and as such, this movie demonstrates a legitimate respect for servicemen and the honour in serving, without deifying either.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Strange History of the American Spoof Movie

Parody movies have been around for a lot longer than we tend to think of them. Even from the earliest days of Hollywood there were movies meant to satirize a particular subject or genre. In the silent era, Buster Keaton was responsible for a few. And in the early sound era, almost as soon as the monster pictures took off did you see comic versions of them -Abbott and Costello hosting a few. But parody movies tended to be subtle for most of cinema history, or parody came in conjunction with another goal of the comedy. It really wasn’t until the 1980s and 90s that it took off and became popularly understood. And there is perhaps a line to be drawn to the counterculture comedy explosion that began in the 1970s through avenues like  Saturday Night Live , which frequently parodied from even its earliest years popular movies and cultural properties of the time. But that is still a way’s back. To my generation though, ‘parody movie’ is perhaps a less known term than the more blunt ‘s...
Post a Comment
Read more

A Stylish and Charmingly Reinvented David Copperfield

The Personal History, Adventures, Experience and Observation of David Copperfield the Younger of Blunderstone Rookery (Which He Never Meant to Publish on Any Account)  is the most important book Charles Dickens ever wrote. It is not the most famous or influential by any means (that would of course be A Christmas Carol ), but it is the book that is the purest expression of the authors’ style, identity, and worldview. It is his most personal work, semi-autobiographical in its story of the chronology from infancy to adulthood of a character who overcomes great loss and hardships to find a fulfilling life as a writer. To read David Copperfield  is to understand Dickens himself. Armando Iannucci knew this when he decided to make a new adaptation of the novel for a twenty-first century audience. He also knew that Dickens adaptations are ubiquitous at this point. Films are a bit rarer, but every few years a new television adaptation rears its head to keep the authors’ unique world an...
Post a Comment
Read more

Notes on the Title Cards of The Lord of the Rings

It might be sacrilege for one who both considers The Lord of the Rings  trilogy to be one of the greatest triumphs of cinema and has been an avid lover of the films since adolescence, to declare that the original theatrical cuts of the films are better than the much beloved extended editions. Easily it’s my most controversial opinion regarding these movies. Don’t get me wrong, I do like the extended editions quite a lot, especially as someone who just enjoys spending time in that universe. They flesh it out more, add extra flavour, and in increasing the length by about an hour really emphasize the epic quality of these films. But I find that the original cuts are generally more cleanly paced, more seamlessly edited, and much more accessible to audiences. All the stuff there is to love about The Lord of the Rings  is there in the original versions, the plethora of new and extended scenes merely add to that for fans. And of those, they fall into three camps for me: 1....
1 comment
Read more