Skip to main content

Lady Bird Sees the Debut of a New Great Director


Greta Gerwig’s been one of indie filmmaking’s brightest stars for a few years now. With Lady Bird though, she’s making her directorial debut and it’s a role she imparts a sense of comfort in. Because not only is this movie quite clearly very personal, and probably semi-autobiographical, but Gerwig shows she has a very natural directorial eye.
A coming-of-age story, Lady Bird follows a year in the life of free-spirited Sacramento native Christine McPherson (Saoirse Ronan) who insists on being called “Lady Bird”. Namely, it’s her final year of high school, as she plans for her future and dreams of going to university in New York, while also dealing with typical teen drama in her friendships and love life. Most notable, is her troubled relationship with her mother (Laurie Metcalf), whose concerns and frank expectations often clash with Lady Bird’s own values and lifestyle.
Lady Bird is certainly a Greta Gerwig film. If it’s title character had at any point taken up dancing, this might have been a prequel to Francis Ha. It’s a film that moves at a relaxed pace and is absolutely character driven. This kind of story about a girl finding herself has been done plenty before and would almost be a cliché of independent film, but Gerwig makes it feel unique. The movie’s got a very particular look to it and a distinct environment. It’s set in the early 2000s and every so often allows world events and politics to infiltrate the story. But at the same time it’s self-contained, as it follows Lady Bird’s school life at a strict Catholic school (reminding me very much of one of the ones I went to), with some very universal story points. High school based coming-of-age stories are expected to abide by certain standards, often the ones set by the likes of John Hughes. But the inspiration here seems to be much more in the vein of The 400 Blows. Lady Bird has a vaguely kindred personality to Antoine Doinel of that film, and the particular examination of misguided youth is very familiar, if executed in a different way. One thing Lady Bird has over that acclaimed film though is a terrific sense of humour, but one that’s especially honest. None of the jokes or comedic scenes feel like a writers’ invention, rather they come naturally from the characters and where they are in life. You really feel like Gerwig lived through and remembered conversations like these, and a few moments especially, are too specific in their quirks to be made up.
Saiorse Ronan is wonderful in this movie. Lady Bird initially feels like a liberal artist caricature, and in many ways she is, but her growth over a year and her self-discoveries go a long way to deepening her. She’s both strikingly genuine and delightfully eccentric, a likeable and really identifiable lead to this story. Laurie Metcalf is also really great as her foil, a figure as strong in her convictions as her daughter. The dynamic between these two, their arguments and more tender moments alike, is the emotional core of the movie and it works superbly on account of how well Ronan and Metcalf perform opposite each other, in humorous, conflicting, and heartfelt moments. Tracey Letts plays Lady Bird’s pleasant and supportive, but down on his luck father with real warmth. And Lucas Hedges proves his versatility as her kindly theatrical love interest Danny. Between this and Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri, this is a very good time for him at the movies. The supporting cast includes Jordan Rodrigues as Lady Bird’s adopted brother Miguel, Beanie Feldstein as her best friend Julie, as well as Lois Smith and Stephen McKinley Henderson.
 Gerwig employs some very specific techniques in her filmmaking here to evoke mood, passage of time, and character perception. A common one that I’ve seen before is the cutting between various locations as a character’s moving past them, to create a graceful flow between shots and establish setting in a visually interesting way. And they’re done aptly, if not all that uniquely. If there were a real flaw, it’s that while there’s a heavy thematic emphasis on the mother-daughter relationship of the piece, it’s sidelined for large portions of the movie -which is fine, because Lady Bird’s social and romantic mistakes are very important. But by the end, this relationship is deemed the film’s central focus which I don’t quite think it is. There’s a point about ten minutes from the credits that would have been the perfect place to end, as with one line it brings to a satisfying close Lady Bird’s personal journey. And the actual final resolution which accentuates the relationship is good too, but is not as fulfilling. Maybe they just needed to be reversed.
Nonetheless, Lady Bird is a really good debut for Greta Gerwig, and I look forward to seeing where she goes now. Again, she feels at home in the directors’ chair and is a talented writer too, this screenplay being one of the best of the year. Her cast is terrific, she imbues charm and some great laughs. It’s a nice little movie that’s sure to connect with a big audience.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Strange History of the American Spoof Movie

Parody movies have been around for a lot longer than we tend to think of them. Even from the earliest days of Hollywood there were movies meant to satirize a particular subject or genre. In the silent era, Buster Keaton was responsible for a few. And in the early sound era, almost as soon as the monster pictures took off did you see comic versions of them -Abbott and Costello hosting a few. But parody movies tended to be subtle for most of cinema history, or parody came in conjunction with another goal of the comedy. It really wasn’t until the 1980s and 90s that it took off and became popularly understood. And there is perhaps a line to be drawn to the counterculture comedy explosion that began in the 1970s through avenues like  Saturday Night Live , which frequently parodied from even its earliest years popular movies and cultural properties of the time. But that is still a way’s back. To my generation though, ‘parody movie’ is perhaps a less known term than the more blunt ‘s...
Post a Comment
Read more

A Stylish and Charmingly Reinvented David Copperfield

The Personal History, Adventures, Experience and Observation of David Copperfield the Younger of Blunderstone Rookery (Which He Never Meant to Publish on Any Account)  is the most important book Charles Dickens ever wrote. It is not the most famous or influential by any means (that would of course be A Christmas Carol ), but it is the book that is the purest expression of the authors’ style, identity, and worldview. It is his most personal work, semi-autobiographical in its story of the chronology from infancy to adulthood of a character who overcomes great loss and hardships to find a fulfilling life as a writer. To read David Copperfield  is to understand Dickens himself. Armando Iannucci knew this when he decided to make a new adaptation of the novel for a twenty-first century audience. He also knew that Dickens adaptations are ubiquitous at this point. Films are a bit rarer, but every few years a new television adaptation rears its head to keep the authors’ unique world an...
Post a Comment
Read more

Notes on the Title Cards of The Lord of the Rings

It might be sacrilege for one who both considers The Lord of the Rings  trilogy to be one of the greatest triumphs of cinema and has been an avid lover of the films since adolescence, to declare that the original theatrical cuts of the films are better than the much beloved extended editions. Easily it’s my most controversial opinion regarding these movies. Don’t get me wrong, I do like the extended editions quite a lot, especially as someone who just enjoys spending time in that universe. They flesh it out more, add extra flavour, and in increasing the length by about an hour really emphasize the epic quality of these films. But I find that the original cuts are generally more cleanly paced, more seamlessly edited, and much more accessible to audiences. All the stuff there is to love about The Lord of the Rings  is there in the original versions, the plethora of new and extended scenes merely add to that for fans. And of those, they fall into three camps for me: 1....
1 comment
Read more