Skip to main content

Downsizing Positively Looks Up


Ever since the early days of film when pioneers like Georges Melies and Fritz Lang used forced perspective to create an effect of someone being smaller than the average human, shrinking in film has been a popular novelty emerging mostly in B-movies and family films. Though it was always something of a gimmick, and has especially been noticeably so after the technology was seemingly perfected in Honey I Shrunk the Kids.
Enter Alexander Payne, director of such films as About Schmidt, Sideways, The Descendants, and Nebraska. His latest movie, Downsizing, aims to offer a new perspective on shrinking stories, by using the idea as a jumping-off point for a basic exploration of humanity and life. And I have to say I was surprised by no movie this year more than Downsizing!
Set in the not too distant future, Norwegian scientists have perfected an irreversible process called downsizing, wherein people are shrunk down to five inches to live in miniature communities, as a solvent to overpopulation. A sustainable lifestyle with the lucrative attraction of an enormous exchange rate, meaning middle-class people can now live rich, it intrigues Paul Safranek (Matt Damon), a financially insecure occupational therapist, and his wife Audrey (Kristen Wiig). After the couple commits to downsizing, Audrey backs out at the last minute, leaving Paul small and alone to re-evaluate his life.
There really is no gimmickry to this movie. Sure there are humourous moments of small people interacting with large people and a joke or two that are mostly seen in the trailers, but the resizing element is at times almost incidental. It’s not like The Borrowers or indeed Honey I Shrunk the Kids, where it’s all based around the novelty of scale -indeed there are stretches where it’s not even visually apparent, apart from a clever detail in the background every once in a while. This is a movie that takes an idea and expands on it by presenting both a real character journey and realistic world within its framework. And it’s an impeccably realized world. This film addresses the medical, societal, economic, environmental, and even political repercussions of downsizing on the world, to the point you believe if it actually were possible, this is exactly what it would look like. There’s satire in this of course, as with many of Payne’s movies, but it’s also coming from a place of earnestness, and fleshing out a concept to its logical conclusion from multiple vantage points.
The story is incredibly unexpected, especially after Paul is downsized and his life takes him in some very new directions. This is where the meat of the film is, and Paul’s journey to find meaning with his new life in this new world. We can all relate to the desire to start over, and this film presents a very appealing satiation of that. But the movie is all about adjustment; to new places, new people, new vocations and responsibilities, new knowledge, and new choices. It’s also about introspective themes about one’s place in the world and what is really worth getting out of life. And Downsizing absolutely achieves its ambition, capturing this beauty of life and raising some remarkable ideas. The ending especially is very foreign to where the movie started, but it has a grand melancholy poetry to it, like those of Her or Close Encounters. For a film that does delve into occasionally depressing material, and some dystopian elements, it is ultimately wonderfully life-affirming.
Damon is good as his every-man protagonist. There’s not a ton that’s distinct about his performance but he performs the character well. Christoph Waltz is very good too as a character who begins as Paul’s neighbour, and Kristen Wiig is perfectly decent in her early movie screen-time. But by far, the stand-out is Hong Chau as Ngoc Lan Tran. I can’t really say much about her character except that she comes to interact with Paul in a very major way. And Chau is magnificent! In the wrong hands this would have been a really annoying character given some of her actions and attitude; and admittedly when she first appears with an accent unfortunately reminiscent of Short Round from Temple of Doom, I was hesitant to follow her. But she really became the soul of the movie, with an immensely sympathetic story herself, and a personality that’s astonishingly endearing. The movie also features Udo Kier, and Rolf LassgÃ¥rd as the inventor of downsizing, amusingly named Jørgen Asbjørnsen, both of whom are good fits. Jason Sudeikis has a minor role as the friend who helps convince Paul to downsize in the first place. And there are cameos from Neil Patrick Harris, Laura Dern, James Van Der Beek, and Character Actress Margo Martindale, most of whom were seen in the trailer over the international characters who have more screen-time and significance.
I hardly expected Downsizing, which from these promotional campaigns, looked like a funny and vaguely interesting but forgettable movie, to be one of my favourite theatre experiences of 2017, but it was. This is a beautiful film. It reminds me a lot Studio Ghibli’s Arrietty, which similarly took the idea of miniature people and weaved a unique narrative out of it. And while that films’ a lot more visually pretty, this one went a little further to distance itself from the typical shrinking story bullet points. In fact, very few of them make an appearance. Downsizing really does reinvent this little sub-genre of science fantasy, using it as a lens to explore greater things. And if only briefly, it convinces us of a process and perspective we all want to have.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Disney's Mulan, Cultural Appropriation, and Exploitation

I’m late on this one I know. I wasn’t willing to spend thirty bucks back in September for a movie experience I knew was going to be far poorer than if I had paid half that at a theatre. So I waited for it to hit streaming for free to give it a shot. In the meantime I heard that it wasn’t very good, but I remained determined not to skip it entirely, partly out of sympathy for director Niki Caro and partly out of morbid curiosity. Disney’s live-action Mulan  I was actually mildly looking forward to early in the year in spite of my well-documented distaste for this series of creative dead zones by the most powerful media conglomerate on earth. Mulan  was never one of Disney’s classics, a movie extremely of its time in its “girl power” gender politics and with a decidedly American take on ancient Chinese mythology. It got by on a couple good songs and a strong lead, but it was a movie that could be improved upon, and this new version looked like it had the potential to do that, em...

The Wizard of Oz: Birth of Imagination

“Somewhere over the rainbow, skies are blue; and the dreams that you dare to dream really do come true.” I don’t think I’ve sat down and watched The Wizard of Oz  in more than fifteen years. Among the first things I noticed doing so now in 2019, nearly eighty years to the day of its original release on August 25th, 1939, was the amount of obvious foreshadowing in the first twenty minutes. The farmhands are each equated with their later analogues through blatant metaphors and personality quirks (Huck’s “head made out of straw” comment), Professor Marvel is clearly a fraud in spite of his good nature, Dorothy at one point straight up calls Miss Gulch a “wicked old witch”. We don’t notice these things watching the film as children, or maybe we do and reason that it doesn’t matter. It still doesn’t matter. Despite being the part of the movie we’re not supposed to care about, the portrait of a dreary Kansas bedighted by one instant icon of a song, those opening sce...

So I Guess Comics Kingdom Sucks Now...

So, I guess Comics Kingdom sucks now. The website run by King Features Syndicate hosting a bunch of their licensed comic strips from classics like Beetle Bailey , Blondie , and Dennis the Menace  to great new strips like Retail , The Pajama Diaries , and Edison Lee  (as well as Sherman’s Lagoon , Zits , On the Fastrack , etc.) underwent a major relaunch early last week that is in just about every way a massive downgrade. The problems are numerous. The layout is distracting and cheap, far more space is allocated for ads so the strips themselves are displayed too small, the banner from which you could formerly browse for other strips is gone (meaning you have to go to the homepage to find other comics you like or discover new ones), the comments section is a joke –not refreshing itself daily so that every comment made on an individual strip remains attached to ALL strips, there’s no more blog or special features on individual comics pages which effectively barricades the ...