Skip to main content

Pixar Sundays: Cars 3 (2017)


No one asked for this. Sure Cars had its fanbase, but after the disaster of Cars 2, why would Pixar continue this franchise?
Okay, I know the marketing gold mine is the main reason but I like to pretend Pixar has more integrity than that. Luckily as of now, there’s no plans for an abysmal fourth movie, so hopefully this is the last we have to suffer. John Lasseter’s heart may not even be in it anymore as this is the first one he didn’t direct, instead handing duties off to a first-timer, Brian Fee. So let’s just get this over with and retaining some hope for Coco, it’s time to look at Cars 3.
Given this franchise’s aversion to original stories, Cars 3 does the has-been trying to prove himself routine. Lightning McQueen is not a young racer anymore and as most of his contemporaries are retiring, new racers are coming to take the limelight. After a bad crash on the track, Lightning does some soul searching, realizing he doesn’t want to be forced into retirement like his mentor Doc Hudson was. Going to an elite training centre, he comes under the tutelage of a trainer called Cruz Ramirez to prepare him for a comeback against his new rival Jackson Storm. But Cruz as it happens, is an aspiring racer herself, and so Lightning in trying to regain his reputation soon finds himself taking her under his wing.
This film was heavily promoted as being a deeper, darker sequel than either predecessor. The teaser was just Lightning’s injured body careening through the air, a stark contrast in tone to anything this series has offered before. However that doesn’t at all portray what the film actually is. Sure the crash is played quite violently for this kind of film and with an attempt at a haunting slow-motion to give it a sense of terminal harm, but afterwards there’s little it does any differently to suggest a more mature direction. The Cars movies (though mostly just the first) have taken after the Rocky films in their characterizations, subject matter, and plot -which is somewhat fair considering most sports movies live in the shadow of Rocky. This movie is a cross of Rocky Balboa and Creed, as Lightning moves between training for a comeback to prove he’s not entirely an old has-been, while also becoming a mentor figure himself to the wannabe racer who idolized him. This is certainly a better focus for the movie following Cars 2, but it’s too heavily steeped in clichés to leave any unique impression. And it doesn’t even do those clichés all that well. Even in the moments where it does come off as kind of good, particularly Cruz’s determination and an okay relationship she has with Lightning as he teaches her, I couldn’t stop thinking how far better it was done in a movie like Creed. The film is dreary and predictable as well, with only a demolition derby sequence in the middle really coming out unexpected. Obviously you know exactly where it’s going to end up, and the road there is pretty dull. The movie also has a predisposition with nostalgia, hearkening back to the first film. A lot of Cars 3 is spent paying tribute to Paul Newman’s Doc Hudson, as if the writers didn’t feel they gave him enough attention in the second movie, which they didn’t. And as good as it is to see the one likeable character from this series given posthumous screen-time with unused dialogue from the first movie reconstituted here, the movie is a little heavy on flashbacks, both from the first movie and this one (I do like that no one acknowledges Cars 2 and that it might as well not exist for how much it influences this movie -the filmmakers want to forget about it as much as we do). This theme also carries over into Lightning’s conflict, with the pressure to retire as many of his fellow racers have done; as well as into a later portion of the movie where Lightning and Cruz train with Doc’s old crew chief Smoky, meeting a bunch of older legend racers in the process. There’s an old vs. new debate subtly employed here, and it seems to come down heavily on the old. The first movie certainly had this too, with the natural beauty theme and the loss of that to modern industrialization. But here it seems to suggest the old ways and the old racers are better, wiser, and there’s no value in the new technological methods to train, or the new racers made in those innovations. Which seems very single-minded to me. It gave off a very “back in my day” vibe, evocative of something like old musicians criticizing the younger generation for getting their start on YouTube rather than in a garage.
Owen Wilson is front and centre again as Lightning and to be fair, he seems to be trying a little more here than in the previous films. But his character still isn’t much more than your stock sports movie lead. That might have been averted if his girlfriend had a larger role and we saw maybe a glimpse of his personal life, but Sally’s got all of four scenes in the movie to remind us she exists and is still with Lightning (would it really be that unbelievable if they’d broken up at some point?). Honestly, I kind of feel like Bonnie Hunt deserves more. Of course her background part is expected considering once again, the Radiator Springs gang are mostly forgotten. But luckily this time that includes Mater. He’s still annoying when he shows up and has an ear-bleedingly obligatory “get ‘er done” forced in there, but he’s incredibly downplayed -which goes to show that Pixar listens to at least some of their criticisms. As usual, there are a ton of sports personality cameos like Bob Costas, Lewis Hamilton, Richard and Kyle Petty, and a couple wasted performances from talents like Kerry Washington and Character Actress Margo Martindale. Generally though, the new cast fare much better than anyone. Sure Chris Cooper as Smokey and to a lesser extent Armie Hammer as Jackson are phoning it in, but Cristela Alonzo is actually giving a pretty decent performance as Cruz. If her character arc wasn’t so stereotypical she might have been the highlight of the movie, and so easily could have been, as there’s a bit of a funny personality to her. If the whole movie was about an already retired Lightning training her as the next great racer, with an emphasis on their relationship and her insecurity, this could have been a perfectly solid film. Similarly, Nathan Fillion isn’t bad as Sterling, Lightning’s new manager, getting in a few digs at Lightning’s “branding” and possibly even some self-mockery at the egregious commercialization of the Cars franchise itself. Oh, and there’s a character and buddy of Lightning’s called “Cal Weathers” -get it??
For the most part, Cars 3, though monotonous, avoids dumb contrivances until the end. Lightning has to perform the big race, but his confidence has been shaken after being beaten by his own protégé on a training track. But he still believes in her and has, since the standard outburst scene, encouraged her to follow her own dream. So in a ridiculous plot device, he stops after the first lap and throws her in as his replacement. She’s given his racing number which apparently means they can get away with this. And of course with him coaching her from the sidelines using the typical references from their experiences earlier and helping her overcome Jackson’s taunts, she realizes her self-assurance and wins the race. Because Lightning technically started the race it means they both won, something only revealed when everyone just assumes Lightning’s going to have to retire now. There is so much in this climax to call bullshit on, and I doubt even many of the kids watching it would buy some of the stupidity! It’s also just constructed to maintain a status quo. Because he still “won”, it means Lightning can still be a racer, and there’s no point in that. It would’ve made sense and even made for an interesting character development if this did force him to retire but on good terms. And then he could just stay Cruz’s trainer. It brings his story to a close, satisfyingly if you’re a fan of the character. But no, he has to still be a racer just in case they decide after all to go ahead with Cars 4! I know I’ve brought this movie up a few times already in this review, but it’s really good and comparable: it would be like if Rocky showed up in Creed to throw the opening punch in Adonis’ match and then been declared winner alongside him. It would actually take away from Creed’s victory as it does here with Cruz. They’re implying Lightning’s become the Doc to Cruz anyway in the final moments, so it really doesn’t make sense to make it all about him again in the end.
The animation for this movie is very good though, it’s nice to look at. You can see the effort put into these effects, the music is a marginal improvement to the previous films, and it is good to see them on the road again for a large part of the story. Cars 3 is also certainly not the embarrassment to Pixar that Cars 2 was. There was a clear attempt to do better in this movie. But that’s a comparison to this studio’s rock bottom, and on its own, Cars 3 is still not good. Between the run-of-the-mill story, unambitious characters, and just a lot of general blandness, it’s a movie that isn’t as offensive as its predecessor, but is rather likely to go down as the most forgettable movie in the Pixar canon.

Lou is fun to watch. Essentially it feels like an alternate interpretation to the Sid confrontation scene from Toy Story. In that this is also about a bully getting his comeuppance of sorts from some anthropomorphic objects. On the school-yard, there’s a bully who frequently steals toys and other playthings from other kids, angering a living pile of objects in the school’s lost and found box. After all the other kids go inside, the pile called Lou (named for the missing “L”, “O”, and “U” letters from “Lost and Found”) goes after the bully’s backpack and stolen toys causing a very eclectic and creative chase sequence. Upon discovering the bully’s name is J.J. and that one of his old toys, stolen by another bully, is in the box, Lou ransoms it for J.J. until he returns all the other childrens’ toys; dissolving in the process and teaching J.J. a lesson in kindness. I love the animation and creativity in the whole chase, particularly in the way Lou moves around, it’s definitely an echo of Hank from Finding Dory. Lou’s composition is interesting as well, with the hoodie for a mouth and baseball eyes hitting an even note between cute and creepy. And the heart of the short is in the right place. This kind of lesson has been done plenty in childrens’ television so it’s nothing new here, but it’s executed nicely enough to perhaps make a difference on some real playground.

Next Week: Coco (2017)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Disney's Mulan, Cultural Appropriation, and Exploitation

I’m late on this one I know. I wasn’t willing to spend thirty bucks back in September for a movie experience I knew was going to be far poorer than if I had paid half that at a theatre. So I waited for it to hit streaming for free to give it a shot. In the meantime I heard that it wasn’t very good, but I remained determined not to skip it entirely, partly out of sympathy for director Niki Caro and partly out of morbid curiosity. Disney’s live-action Mulan  I was actually mildly looking forward to early in the year in spite of my well-documented distaste for this series of creative dead zones by the most powerful media conglomerate on earth. Mulan  was never one of Disney’s classics, a movie extremely of its time in its “girl power” gender politics and with a decidedly American take on ancient Chinese mythology. It got by on a couple good songs and a strong lead, but it was a movie that could be improved upon, and this new version looked like it had the potential to do that, emphasizing

The Hays Code was Bad, Sex in Movies is Good

Don't Look Now (1973) Will Hays, Who Knows About Sex In 1930, former Republican politician and chair of the Motion Picture Association of America Will Hayes introduced a series of self-censorship guidelines for the movie industry in response to a mixture of celebrity scandals and lobbying from the Catholic Church against various ‘immoralities’ creating a perception of Hollywood as corrupt and indecent. The Hays Code, or the Motion Picture Production Code, was formally adopted in 1930, though not stringently enforced until 1934 under the auspices of Joseph Breen. It laid out a careful list of what was and wasn’t acceptable for a film expecting major distribution. It stipulated rules against profanity, the depiction of miscegenation, and offensive portrayals of the clergy, but a lot of it was based around sexual content: “sexual perversion” of any kind was disallowed, as were any opaquely textual or visual allusions to reproduction, and right near the top “No licentious or suggestiv

Pixar Sundays: The Incredibles (2004)

          Brad Bird was already a master by the time he came to Pixar. Not only did he hone his craft as an early director on The Simpsons , but he directed a little animated film for Warner Bros. in 1999, that though not a box office success was loved by critics and quickly grew a cult following. The Iron Giant is now among many people’s favourite animated movies. Likewise, Bird’s feature debut at Pixar, The Incredibles , his own variation of a superhero movie, is often considered one of the studio’s best. And for very good reason, as the most talented director at Pixar shows.            Superheroes were once the world’s greatest crime-fighting force until several lawsuits for collateral damage (and in the case of Mr. Incredible, a hilarious suicide prevention), outlawed their vigilantism. Fifteen years later Mr. Incredible, now living as Bob Parr, has a family with his wife Helen, the former Elastigirl. But Bob, in a combination of mid-life crisis and nostalgia for the old day