So Ralph Bakshi’s film ended on a quick semi-resolution, but the ring was not destroyed and the journey not over. Somebody needed to finish the job. So Rankin/Bass hastily took up the task of adapting The Return of the King in 1980. However this wasn’t just a transition of artist and style, but also format. Bakshi’s movie had been a feature film, but Rankin/Bass was going the route of their Hobbit and doing it as a TV special, meaning it would be much shorter, cheaper, and more condensed. Also, since Rankin/Bass had nothing to do with Bakshi’s film, they picked up the story, but as a sequel to their Hobbit ; making for a very weird presentation that follows up essentially where The Lord of the Rings left off, but without acknowledging its specific continuity and darker tone. It’d be like if Jackson quit after The Two Towers and the story was picked up by Wes Anderson as a sequel to Leonard Nimoy’s “Ballad of Bilbo Baggins”. As you may be able to guess from all this, The Return
Criticism, Essays, and Ramblings from Another Online Film Critic. Support me on Patreon at https://www.patreon.com/JordanBosch, follow me @Jordan_D_Bosch on Twitter and at Jordan Bosch on Letterboxd