Skip to main content

Jackie Chan Proves Himself in The Foreigner


It’s been a while since we’ve seen a Jackie Chan movie. His last major English language film that I can recall was the 2010 remake of The Karate Kid. He used to be everywhere in the 90’s and early 2000’s, the face of martial arts around the world. But he’s in his sixties now, playing very much against type in The Foreigner, which while being a nice welcome back for his fans, is unlike any other Jackie Chan movie.
When a resurgent IRA group cause a bombing at a London bank, resulting in the death of his daughter (Katie Leung), Ngoc Minh Quan (Chan) makes it his mission to exact revenge on the people responsible. He targets Liam Hennessy (Pierce Brosnan), the Deputy Minister of Northern Ireland and a former IRA member himself for information. Hennessy, who’s having enough trouble trying to control the situation and cover his tracks, is unable to give Quan the names of the terrorists. But he doesn’t count on Quan’s history as a special forces soldier in the Vietnam War leading him to take drastic actions to repel and intimidate Hennessy until he gets the names he wants.
The first thing that needs to be said is that Jackie Chan is great in this movie. He’s always been an entertaining performer, through his impressive stunt-work and skill for physical comedy alike. But he’s never really stood out as a good actor necessarily. This film changes that, as he gives a really engaging performance as a grizzled man who’s been through his share of terrors, and after losing his third daughter is distraught to the point of taking violent action. And while the action scenes he performs are very good, they’re not all that frequent, Quan often resorting to other tactics, and even when we do see hand-to-hand combat it’s rougher than anything you’d see in Rush Hour or Shanghai Noon. Though he’s very skilled at what he does, you can definitely feel his age, and Chan plays it with believable weariness. I’d love to see him take on more roles like this. This film also reunites GoldenEye director Martin Campbell with Pierce Brosnan, who delivers a great performance as well. Admittedly, he is a little bit of a clichéd corrupt politician, but not exactly the villain, and Brosnan is given some very interesting facets of the character to play. The film is fairly evenly divided between the two leads, devoting a lot of time to Hennessy’s ties to the IRA and siphoning a lot of the political intrigue through the characters connected to him. These include his wife played by Orla Brady, his mistress played by Charlie Murphy, his army nephew played by Rory Fleck-Byrne, his accomplice played by Dermot Crowley, and an always threatening Michael McElhatton as his right-hand man, all of whom are perfectly serviceable.
The pacing is really good in this movie; it’s two hours, but doesn’t feel like it. And for the most part. the story is good. However the book it’s based on, The Chinaman, by Stephen Leather (a name Quan’s frequently referred to as), was written well into the Troubles, when the IRA was still a dangerous presence in the U.K. But setting this film in the modern day, there’s no explanation given for why the IRA have come back now. One could easily have been made believable, but without, it does leave the political conflict coming off a bit outdated and forced. For a good portion of the movie too, Quan is hiding out in a forest from Hennessy’s men whom he injures or incapacitates when they pursue him a la First Blood. But it does stall the drive of the film somewhat, confining him to just this one location. It was a lot more interesting when the cat and mouse game was more pronounced and Quan was evading and getting the best of Hennessy all over Belfast.
As far as I know, The Foreigner is the first Jackie Chan movie set entirely in the U.K. And it does address the racial tension he experiences as an immigrant, obviously from the offensive moniker, but also in more subtle scenes. Likewise it might be his first movie where his martial arts roots are relatively played down. And the movie benefits for it. It’s nothing great, but isn’t really disappointing either. It’s worth seeing for the performances, particularly Chan’s, and if you’re in the mood for a decent thriller.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Disney's Mulan, Cultural Appropriation, and Exploitation

I’m late on this one I know. I wasn’t willing to spend thirty bucks back in September for a movie experience I knew was going to be far poorer than if I had paid half that at a theatre. So I waited for it to hit streaming for free to give it a shot. In the meantime I heard that it wasn’t very good, but I remained determined not to skip it entirely, partly out of sympathy for director Niki Caro and partly out of morbid curiosity. Disney’s live-action Mulan  I was actually mildly looking forward to early in the year in spite of my well-documented distaste for this series of creative dead zones by the most powerful media conglomerate on earth. Mulan  was never one of Disney’s classics, a movie extremely of its time in its “girl power” gender politics and with a decidedly American take on ancient Chinese mythology. It got by on a couple good songs and a strong lead, but it was a movie that could be improved upon, and this new version looked like it had the potential to do that, emphasizing
Post a Comment
Read more

The Hays Code was Bad, Sex in Movies is Good

Don't Look Now (1973) Will Hays, Who Knows About Sex In 1930, former Republican politician and chair of the Motion Picture Association of America Will Hayes introduced a series of self-censorship guidelines for the movie industry in response to a mixture of celebrity scandals and lobbying from the Catholic Church against various ‘immoralities’ creating a perception of Hollywood as corrupt and indecent. The Hays Code, or the Motion Picture Production Code, was formally adopted in 1930, though not stringently enforced until 1934 under the auspices of Joseph Breen. It laid out a careful list of what was and wasn’t acceptable for a film expecting major distribution. It stipulated rules against profanity, the depiction of miscegenation, and offensive portrayals of the clergy, but a lot of it was based around sexual content: “sexual perversion” of any kind was disallowed, as were any opaquely textual or visual allusions to reproduction, and right near the top “No licentious or suggestiv
Post a Comment
Read more

Pixar Sundays: The Incredibles (2004)

          Brad Bird was already a master by the time he came to Pixar. Not only did he hone his craft as an early director on The Simpsons , but he directed a little animated film for Warner Bros. in 1999, that though not a box office success was loved by critics and quickly grew a cult following. The Iron Giant is now among many people’s favourite animated movies. Likewise, Bird’s feature debut at Pixar, The Incredibles , his own variation of a superhero movie, is often considered one of the studio’s best. And for very good reason, as the most talented director at Pixar shows.            Superheroes were once the world’s greatest crime-fighting force until several lawsuits for collateral damage (and in the case of Mr. Incredible, a hilarious suicide prevention), outlawed their vigilantism. Fifteen years later Mr. Incredible, now living as Bob Parr, has a family with his wife Helen, the former Elastigirl. But Bob, in a combination of mid-life crisis and nostalgia for the old day
1 comment
Read more