Skip to main content

Blade Runner 2049: A Truly Masterful Sequel


Blade Runner is just one of those movies that everyone, whether they’re inclined towards it or not, should see. Ridley Scott’s 1982 futuristic film noir based loosely on Philip K. Dick’s Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? is one of the greatest works of cerebral science-fiction ever made -even if it took twenty-five years until the Final Cut to make that apparent. Visually magnificent, captivating, and unrelentingly provocative, it’s certainly a movie that never needed a sequel.
But it grew a cult following and eventually near universal acclaim, and so now, we have Blade Runner 2049. It’s directed by Quebecois filmmaker Denis Villeneuve -who’s built quite a pedigree for himself the past couple years with movies like Sicario and Arrival. And his attitude seems to be “this movie doesn’t need to exist, but it might as well be done right!”
Thirty years after the original, newly perfected synthetic replicants live among humans. One of these, K (Ryan Gosling), works for the LAPD as a Blade Runner, now hunting down old rogue Tyrell-model replicants. However, when he discovers the remains of one buried on a farm, a mystery presents itself which puts him at risk from the Wallace Corporation, and eventually leads to him finding the missing Rick Deckard (Harrison Ford).
Villeneuve clearly loves Blade Runner. This is evident in how he and cinematographer Roger Deakins capture the look and feel of the original to a tee. It’s got the same unique atmosphere, the same collision of beauty and grittiness in its vision of the future, and the same stylish artistry to the whole production. Deakins’ work is absolutely magnificent and the world is well-realized. Though Vangelis’ glorious motif only surfaces once, the music is good. And the visual effects of this movie are astounding! The technology is well-rendered, and I don’t know if I’ve ever seen better compositing than in some of these scenes. Even where there are flaws in some of the effects, it comes off as intentional, it’s really quite clever.
The story keeps you intrigued too. However it’s complexity can bog it down a bit. The original had a relatively simple plot through which to convey its existentialist themes, and here it’s almost reversed. This is notable in how the movie is a little too long. I also missed a lot of the noir aspect. It’s still there, but the film leans more heavily to the sci-fi/action angle. I love the decision to make K a replicant though, leading to a more fascinating protagonist than Deckard was originally. Also, unlike Deckard, the case he’s working on has a more personal affect, allowing the audience to better engage with his deductions. I admire how this film doesn’t rely much on the events of the original, rather it feels like merely another story in this universe. Roy Batty and his Nexus-6 gang are never even mentioned, which actually reinforces the poignancy of his fate.
As far as the cast of this movie, I’m incredibly impressed by how international it is. From Ana de Armas who’s Cuban, to the Swiss Carla Juri; Israeli Hiam Abbass, and Dutch Sylvia Hoeks as Luv, one of the main antagonists, it’s a great cultural mosaic of talented actors. Of course it’s Canadian Ryan Gosling who’s front and centre, and he’s terrific as K. Playing a character like this, it would have been easy to fall into A.I. clichés, but Gosling plays K’s emotional detachment believably, as well as his development as the mysteries unfold. Harrison Ford is still great as Deckard, though his role is substantially smaller than the advertising would have you believe. He’s a supporting character, this is really K’s story. Robin Wright plays his superior, and in smaller roles are Mackenzie Davis, Barkhad Abdi, and Dave Bautista; and Edward James Olmos even reprises his role from the first movie for a cameo. The only disappointing performance was from Jared Leto as Niander Wallace. His dialogue is more than a little hammy, and you get the sense he’s trying too hard to seem deep. Also, as the villain, he just can’t compare to Rutger Hauer’s revelatory Batty. As great as this film is, there’s nothing on par with his iconic “tears in the rain” monologue.
Before you see this movie, check out Black Out 2022, a prequel short made by Shinichirō Watanabe of the terrific anime Cowboy Bebop -one of the many artists inspired by Blade Runner. Villeneuve was also one of those artists, and with Blade Runner 2049, he’s managed to do the impossible: follow-up a classic decades later with a worthy successor. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Disney's Mulan, Cultural Appropriation, and Exploitation

I’m late on this one I know. I wasn’t willing to spend thirty bucks back in September for a movie experience I knew was going to be far poorer than if I had paid half that at a theatre. So I waited for it to hit streaming for free to give it a shot. In the meantime I heard that it wasn’t very good, but I remained determined not to skip it entirely, partly out of sympathy for director Niki Caro and partly out of morbid curiosity. Disney’s live-action Mulan  I was actually mildly looking forward to early in the year in spite of my well-documented distaste for this series of creative dead zones by the most powerful media conglomerate on earth. Mulan  was never one of Disney’s classics, a movie extremely of its time in its “girl power” gender politics and with a decidedly American take on ancient Chinese mythology. It got by on a couple good songs and a strong lead, but it was a movie that could be improved upon, and this new version looked like it had the potential to do that, emphasizing

The Hays Code was Bad, Sex in Movies is Good

Don't Look Now (1973) Will Hays, Who Knows About Sex In 1930, former Republican politician and chair of the Motion Picture Association of America Will Hayes introduced a series of self-censorship guidelines for the movie industry in response to a mixture of celebrity scandals and lobbying from the Catholic Church against various ‘immoralities’ creating a perception of Hollywood as corrupt and indecent. The Hays Code, or the Motion Picture Production Code, was formally adopted in 1930, though not stringently enforced until 1934 under the auspices of Joseph Breen. It laid out a careful list of what was and wasn’t acceptable for a film expecting major distribution. It stipulated rules against profanity, the depiction of miscegenation, and offensive portrayals of the clergy, but a lot of it was based around sexual content: “sexual perversion” of any kind was disallowed, as were any opaquely textual or visual allusions to reproduction, and right near the top “No licentious or suggestiv

Pixar Sundays: The Incredibles (2004)

          Brad Bird was already a master by the time he came to Pixar. Not only did he hone his craft as an early director on The Simpsons , but he directed a little animated film for Warner Bros. in 1999, that though not a box office success was loved by critics and quickly grew a cult following. The Iron Giant is now among many people’s favourite animated movies. Likewise, Bird’s feature debut at Pixar, The Incredibles , his own variation of a superhero movie, is often considered one of the studio’s best. And for very good reason, as the most talented director at Pixar shows.            Superheroes were once the world’s greatest crime-fighting force until several lawsuits for collateral damage (and in the case of Mr. Incredible, a hilarious suicide prevention), outlawed their vigilantism. Fifteen years later Mr. Incredible, now living as Bob Parr, has a family with his wife Helen, the former Elastigirl. But Bob, in a combination of mid-life crisis and nostalgia for the old day