Skip to main content

One Saturday Morning Retrospective Month: Teachers' Pet and House of Mouse


Teachers’ Pet
          “That looks like Cranium” was my first thought upon seeing the previews for Teacher’s Pet. Sure enough, it was created by Gary Baseman, who designed Cranium, as well as Cheri and Bill Steinkellner from Cheers oddly enough. Despite the talent involved, this show is not an eighth as good as either of those other properties.
          It’s about a dog called Spot (voiced by Nathan Lane) who wants desperately to go to school for no real reason explained other than adventure, which -yeah, it’s a bit of a long-shot you’ll find that in school. Donning glasses, an outfit, and the name “Scott” he enrols in the same fourth grade class as his owner Leonard, which also happens to be taught by Leonards’ mother, Mrs. Helperman. While Leonard finds out quickly enough who his classmate is, they hide it from his mother and everyone else. With nobody having the smarts or depth perception enough to see he’s just a dog in human clothes, he gets up to wacky antics as a pet passing for a student. 
          Obviously the premise doesn’t have a lot going for it and is just generally pretty dumb. But it’s not complimented by bland writing, characterization, and animation that seems better suited for something more surreal or unorthodox like Ren and Stimpy or Spongebob Squarepants. Nathan Lane’s distinct voice can be funny when properly utilized, like in The Lion King franchise (and then only about half the time), but here it feels like the comedy is more reliant on his voice than on any good humour. In fact, more often than not, he’s annoying. The show is clearly trying to incorporate Lane’s showmanship in an over-the-top manner, but it very rarely strikes a chord. And if you think Lane’s a big name to headline a Saturday morning cartoon, he’s accompanied by way too many good actors in supporting roles. In addition to Spot, Leonard has a parrot called Pretty Boy voiced by Jerry Stiller, and a cat called Mr.Jolly voiced by David Ogden Stiers. What the hell are they doing in this? Same goes for Wallace Shawn as the principal who has an over-established dislike of dogs. All three of these actors are very funny as we know from their previous work, but not in Teacher’s Pet, where they could easily be subbed out for any mediocre voice actor. This show also features a post-Independence Day but pre-Katara Mae Whitman as Leonard’s one-dimensional love interest. Mrs. Helperman is voiced by Debra Jo Rupp, who is kind of ideal for the part, and does have a good funny voice. Though her personality consists of being really enthusiastic about everything and frequently embarrassing her son -so essentially the same as on That 70's Show. The opposite of her would be the over-the-top, obnoxious and gross nerd character called Ian, whose voice the creators must think is funny, but only makes me want him violently killed. 
          Much like this character, Teacher’s Pet is very loud and obnoxious, as though it’s trying to make up for not being funny, by being in-your-face. There’s very little creativity to the plots, but in moments you can see it trying to be Recess or Pepper Ann or 101 Dalmatians. But it doesn’t have the strength of character for that. A number of stories revolve around the disparity of Spot being a dog and a student, like when he can’t help but stick his head out the window of a driving bus, or when he antagonizes a postman. And despite such incidents, no one can tell he’s a dog which is still the most absurd fallacy of this shows’ premise. Not to mention his and the other pets’ abilities to talk being largely ignored.
          I like the uniqueness of Gary Basemans’ designs, but I feel they don’t suit animation as well as they do hand-drawn art. Or maybe that’s just because the world of this show looks flat and pale. Teacher’s Pet somehow got its own movie, even more inexplicably than Doug, a couple years after it went off the air, and has since been forgotten about for good reason. It was a one-note idea that led to a one-note show with a cast too good for it. 

House of Mouse

          This might just be the most shameless show of the One Saturday Morning block. You can practically hear the cartoony dollar signs in Michael Eisner’s eyes at the idea of a club for all the marketable Disney characters. Everyone from the earliest shorts to the latest Disney hits could, and most likely would, appear in this show. It’s the ultimate exploitation of their properties. But House of Mouse existed for another reason too. There was a previous show called Mickey Mouse Works, which was essentially a series of new cartoons created with the classic Disney characters, with the intent of recapturing the feel of the old Disney shorts. Essentially, House of Mouse was a reworking of that show, reprising many of the shorts within a new framing device. Their repetition here in a context is why I didn’t cover Mickey Mouse Works itself.
          However the Mickey Mouse Works shorts are mostly sub-par. I think because of recurring elements like Mickey’s house, it has the feel more of a variety show than independent sketches. But the overarching device was more interesting anyway, and I actually like the idea of the classic Disney gang running a club. Mickey’s the host of course, with Donald as his co-manager and Minnie as the bookkeeper. Goofy’s the restaurateur, Daisy’s the clerk, and even Max is there as the parking attendant. Pluto hangs around too, and Pete regularly features as an antagonist trying to shut them down. The only casting decision that grates on me is Quack Pack era Huey, Dewey, and Louie being the club band -luckily they don’t feature a ton. And yeah, while it’s hard to ignore how blatant the marketing is by showing so many Disney characters in one room reacting to things (the opening makes sure you notice the seven dwarves, Beast, the Mad Hatter, Winnie the Pooh, and Ariel among others), they are fairly confined to cameo roles, with a few exceptions. Because Disney owned Nathan Lane and he was simultaneously doing Teacher’s Pet, Timon has recurring speaking roles; Jerry Orbach actually does Lumiere for a handful of episodes and James Woods will be Hades for anything. But it is genuinely a treat to see lesser known Disney characters showing up, not just from the movies, but the original cartoons, like Clarabelle Cow, Horace Horsecollar, Mortimer Mouse, and Ludwig Von Drake. Hell, the house cleaner is the magical broom from “The Sorcerer’s Apprentice” -that’s a really great detail.
          In fact there are more than a few great easter eggs to Disney’s history, and this show delights in using them, even as main points of individual shows. One episode features the reunion of the Three Caballeros, another follows-up on A Goofy Movie with Max and Roxanne on a date, and another is a big homage to the black and white cartoon era. In fact, though most of the shorts shown are modern, they do intermittently introduce new audiences to the old cartoons, like in the Chip n’ Dale episode, and these are still quite good. It’s stuff like this that shows House of Mouse was trying to do more than exploit Disney characters. There was a real love for Disney history here and its evident on screen. At the same time, you can tell where House of Mouse was just incorporating unused pitches from previous Disney shows like Timon and Pumbaa, Aladdin, and Goof Troop. And some of the jokes at the expense of Disney characters could get pretty bad.
          It’s easy to see this show as just a sell-out, and sometimes it really feels like it, but it was also an earnest celebration of Disney’s legacy. The comedy wasn’t bad, the classic characters are still funny and likeable, and the animation is decent (except on some of the film characters where it heavily pales next to their movies). I do wish the Disney TV characters showed up, as apart from a cameo by Pepper Ann and her mum, none of them do. Also it’s set in Toon Town, which suggests Warner Brothers and MGM characters should be appearing too, but maybe Mickey has some discriminatory policy against them. Regardless, House of Mouse was a surprisingly cute and fun show for any Disney fan, and of course as kids we loved it. And as far as soulless commercials for Disney go, this was one of the best ones.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Disney's Mulan, Cultural Appropriation, and Exploitation

I’m late on this one I know. I wasn’t willing to spend thirty bucks back in September for a movie experience I knew was going to be far poorer than if I had paid half that at a theatre. So I waited for it to hit streaming for free to give it a shot. In the meantime I heard that it wasn’t very good, but I remained determined not to skip it entirely, partly out of sympathy for director Niki Caro and partly out of morbid curiosity. Disney’s live-action Mulan  I was actually mildly looking forward to early in the year in spite of my well-documented distaste for this series of creative dead zones by the most powerful media conglomerate on earth. Mulan  was never one of Disney’s classics, a movie extremely of its time in its “girl power” gender politics and with a decidedly American take on ancient Chinese mythology. It got by on a couple good songs and a strong lead, but it was a movie that could be improved upon, and this new version looked like it had the potential to do that, emphasizing

The Hays Code was Bad, Sex in Movies is Good

Don't Look Now (1973) Will Hays, Who Knows About Sex In 1930, former Republican politician and chair of the Motion Picture Association of America Will Hayes introduced a series of self-censorship guidelines for the movie industry in response to a mixture of celebrity scandals and lobbying from the Catholic Church against various ‘immoralities’ creating a perception of Hollywood as corrupt and indecent. The Hays Code, or the Motion Picture Production Code, was formally adopted in 1930, though not stringently enforced until 1934 under the auspices of Joseph Breen. It laid out a careful list of what was and wasn’t acceptable for a film expecting major distribution. It stipulated rules against profanity, the depiction of miscegenation, and offensive portrayals of the clergy, but a lot of it was based around sexual content: “sexual perversion” of any kind was disallowed, as were any opaquely textual or visual allusions to reproduction, and right near the top “No licentious or suggestiv

Pixar Sundays: The Incredibles (2004)

          Brad Bird was already a master by the time he came to Pixar. Not only did he hone his craft as an early director on The Simpsons , but he directed a little animated film for Warner Bros. in 1999, that though not a box office success was loved by critics and quickly grew a cult following. The Iron Giant is now among many people’s favourite animated movies. Likewise, Bird’s feature debut at Pixar, The Incredibles , his own variation of a superhero movie, is often considered one of the studio’s best. And for very good reason, as the most talented director at Pixar shows.            Superheroes were once the world’s greatest crime-fighting force until several lawsuits for collateral damage (and in the case of Mr. Incredible, a hilarious suicide prevention), outlawed their vigilantism. Fifteen years later Mr. Incredible, now living as Bob Parr, has a family with his wife Helen, the former Elastigirl. But Bob, in a combination of mid-life crisis and nostalgia for the old day