Skip to main content

Does It Float?


          After the disappointment of The Dark Tower, there was a lot of pressure on It, directed by Andy Muschietti to be good. It is one of Stephen King’s best-known books, which is saying something considering his body of work. And considering the only time the story been adapted before was a rather lame miniseries in 1990, this film has been long overdue.
          Set in the fictional town of Derry, Maine during the summer of 1989, a number of children have been going missing. After experiencing a series of waking nightmares, a group of outcast pre-teens calling themselves the “Loser’s Club”, led by Billy (whose brother is one of the missing kids), determine that these incidents are part of pattern taking place every twenty-seven years. Each of their worst fears is being exploited by a supernatural being commonly in the guise of a clown called Pennywise (Bill SkarsgÃ¥rd) who wants to capture them and feed off their fears. Learning this, they have to muster their courage and face terrors in the hopes of defeating this monster they merely refer to as “It”.
          This movie isn’t a complete adaptation, as it only covers the first-half of the book -the second taking place when they’re adults. Nonetheless this could be a complete story on its own. And just as a story, it’s very good. Unlike The Dark Tower, this feels like Stephen King. This also means It goes to dark and gritty places despite the young cast. Though certainly not gory, there is some grisly and disturbing imagery. And the abusive father of the sole girl in the group, Beverly, is easily one of the creepiest parts of the movie. However a problem with the film is the conflict of tone. Half the time this is a horror movie, but the other half it appears to be a coming-of-age indie drama. Sometimes the dual tones don’t affect each other, but there are a few moments where the contrast is terribly stark. Like there’s one moment where the gang is looking at a horrifying sight, and it immediately transitions into a clean-up montage set to upbeat 80s music. There’s another scene where they’re facing off against some bullies, that’s played as if they’re having a food fight, only they’re actually trying to stone each other! It’s really bizarre! 
          But one thing It does really well is the kids. King knows how to write kids well and realistically; and the Loser Club definitely feels reminiscent of the boys from Stand By Me for instance, or indeed the heavily-inspired-by-King Stranger Things. Billy, Beverly, Richie, Ben, Eddie, Stan, and Mike aren’t all well-defined, but each of them has enough of an established personality (as well as their individual fears) that they are likeable. And all of them are played by decent actors. Jaeden Lieberher and Sophia Lillis stand out as Billy and Beverly. But the one who sometimes doesn’t work is Finn Wolfhard as Richie. He’s not bad, but he’s supposed to be the jerk of the group, and Wolfhard is just too likeable (also, I hope he doesn’t just get typecast as ‘80s kids). They’re often tormented by teenage bullies though, who are really over-the-top. Just like Kiefer Sutherland in Stand By Me -what is it with Stephen King bullies that makes them all murderous psychopaths?
          But arguably the most important part of It is Pennywise, and while SkarsgÃ¥rd is definitely an improvement over Tim Curry from the miniseries (though Curry is by far more memorable), there are definite problems with the character. The biggest one being he’s not all that scary. When he’s just the clown, he’s only mildly intimidating, and when he’s trying to scare the kids, some of the time it works, but his frequent spasmodic charges are really cheap attempts at jump scares. Once in a while he has a funny moment to remind us he’s supposed to be a clown, but there’s never that John Wayne Gacy predator vibe about him that would substantially add to his creepiness. He’s really nothing more than a killer clown. If you have coulrophobia, he’ll terrify you, but otherwise the scares will mostly come from other places. And while there aren’t a ton of really scary moments, there are some that are very good; such as a great sequence in a library, in a synagogue, and in a probably too obvious haunted house. Also, the famous opening scene at the sewer grate is done really well, with one shot in particular being especially terrifying.
          My understanding is a sequel is being made by the same people that will cover the second-half of the book. And I am actually looking forward to It -part two. Despite the tonal inconsistency, and disappointment of Pennywise, it was a very well-written story, and kept you invested. There’s great atmosphere and a fitting sense of dread as well, and the characters are a likeable bunch. The only thing is, It had the makings of a great movie, and instead is just pretty good -something that will sufficiently hold us over until Stranger Things season two.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Disney's Mulan, Cultural Appropriation, and Exploitation

I’m late on this one I know. I wasn’t willing to spend thirty bucks back in September for a movie experience I knew was going to be far poorer than if I had paid half that at a theatre. So I waited for it to hit streaming for free to give it a shot. In the meantime I heard that it wasn’t very good, but I remained determined not to skip it entirely, partly out of sympathy for director Niki Caro and partly out of morbid curiosity. Disney’s live-action Mulan  I was actually mildly looking forward to early in the year in spite of my well-documented distaste for this series of creative dead zones by the most powerful media conglomerate on earth. Mulan  was never one of Disney’s classics, a movie extremely of its time in its “girl power” gender politics and with a decidedly American take on ancient Chinese mythology. It got by on a couple good songs and a strong lead, but it was a movie that could be improved upon, and this new version looked like it had the potential to do that, emphasizing

The Hays Code was Bad, Sex in Movies is Good

Don't Look Now (1973) Will Hays, Who Knows About Sex In 1930, former Republican politician and chair of the Motion Picture Association of America Will Hayes introduced a series of self-censorship guidelines for the movie industry in response to a mixture of celebrity scandals and lobbying from the Catholic Church against various ‘immoralities’ creating a perception of Hollywood as corrupt and indecent. The Hays Code, or the Motion Picture Production Code, was formally adopted in 1930, though not stringently enforced until 1934 under the auspices of Joseph Breen. It laid out a careful list of what was and wasn’t acceptable for a film expecting major distribution. It stipulated rules against profanity, the depiction of miscegenation, and offensive portrayals of the clergy, but a lot of it was based around sexual content: “sexual perversion” of any kind was disallowed, as were any opaquely textual or visual allusions to reproduction, and right near the top “No licentious or suggestiv

Pixar Sundays: The Incredibles (2004)

          Brad Bird was already a master by the time he came to Pixar. Not only did he hone his craft as an early director on The Simpsons , but he directed a little animated film for Warner Bros. in 1999, that though not a box office success was loved by critics and quickly grew a cult following. The Iron Giant is now among many people’s favourite animated movies. Likewise, Bird’s feature debut at Pixar, The Incredibles , his own variation of a superhero movie, is often considered one of the studio’s best. And for very good reason, as the most talented director at Pixar shows.            Superheroes were once the world’s greatest crime-fighting force until several lawsuits for collateral damage (and in the case of Mr. Incredible, a hilarious suicide prevention), outlawed their vigilantism. Fifteen years later Mr. Incredible, now living as Bob Parr, has a family with his wife Helen, the former Elastigirl. But Bob, in a combination of mid-life crisis and nostalgia for the old day