Skip to main content

Jodie Whittaker: The New Face of Doctor Who


          So once again we have a new Doctor officially cast, and for some reason I suspect this one’s going to be getting a lot more attention than the last few, and not just because we’re going into lucky Doctor Thirteen. But admit it, it was fairly likely with all the fan demand, longevity of the show, and nature of the character that the next Doctor was going to be a cast member from Broadchurch. Hell, with David Bradley officially playing the First Doctor in this year’s Christmas special, Broadchurch has had two Doctors in its cast already (three if you count Lenny Henry’s sketch), a companion, a few alien villains, and even Gwen Cooper from Torchwood. Chris Chibnall likes this universe’s talent, and he’s just added a new name to it.
          Enter Jodie Whittaker, easily one of the best cast members from Broadchurch, certainly the one with the most demanding role at its outset. Beth Latimer is going to be a Time Lord and I think that’s cool. She wasn’t who I was expecting, though in fairness I haven’t paid a ton of attention to the speculation, and as far as Broadchurch cast members go I would have preferred Olivia Colman. But Whittaker is certainly a good actress and I can see her pulling off one of the greatest heroes in the whole of fiction. Whether she actually does that remains to be seen, but I have confidence, especially with someone like Chibnall taking over, who both knows good storytelling and the strengths of this actress. 
          Is there anything else worth saying about Jodie Whittaker cast as the next Doctor? 

           Oh yeah. She’s a woman.

          And for some reason this is stirring controversy. I already talked about the idea of a female Doctor and how this was inevitable, so just read that for further clarification. Suffice it to say, Doctor Who has been a show in evolution since its earliest years and it doesn’t bother me one iota that the new Doctor doesn’t have a penis. What matters is the quality of the art itself. As long as the character is done justice and the stories told well, the sex of the Doctor is irrelevant. If the character is not done justice and the stories told poorly, her sex would still be irrelevant. At the same time I acknowledge this is a big step, and an important one. Doctor Who by its root philosophy, embraces diversity, and those who are mad at just the fact the Doctor’s a woman are probably fans of the show for the wrong reasons.
          And we don’t know anything about Jodie Whittaker’s Doctor yet. Every new Doctor deserves the benefit of the doubt. Some like Christopher Eccleston and Peter Capaldi had already proven themselves great actors before taking the role, while others like Matt Smith and even David Tennant were relatively new faces who had a lot to prove. Whittaker I think is somewhere between them, and I’m anticipating eagerly where she and Chris Chibnall take the character in 2018.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Strange History of the American Spoof Movie

Parody movies have been around for a lot longer than we tend to think of them. Even from the earliest days of Hollywood there were movies meant to satirize a particular subject or genre. In the silent era, Buster Keaton was responsible for a few. And in the early sound era, almost as soon as the monster pictures took off did you see comic versions of them -Abbott and Costello hosting a few. But parody movies tended to be subtle for most of cinema history, or parody came in conjunction with another goal of the comedy. It really wasn’t until the 1980s and 90s that it took off and became popularly understood. And there is perhaps a line to be drawn to the counterculture comedy explosion that began in the 1970s through avenues like  Saturday Night Live , which frequently parodied from even its earliest years popular movies and cultural properties of the time. But that is still a way’s back. To my generation though, ‘parody movie’ is perhaps a less known term than the more blunt ‘s...
Post a Comment
Read more

A Stylish and Charmingly Reinvented David Copperfield

The Personal History, Adventures, Experience and Observation of David Copperfield the Younger of Blunderstone Rookery (Which He Never Meant to Publish on Any Account)  is the most important book Charles Dickens ever wrote. It is not the most famous or influential by any means (that would of course be A Christmas Carol ), but it is the book that is the purest expression of the authors’ style, identity, and worldview. It is his most personal work, semi-autobiographical in its story of the chronology from infancy to adulthood of a character who overcomes great loss and hardships to find a fulfilling life as a writer. To read David Copperfield  is to understand Dickens himself. Armando Iannucci knew this when he decided to make a new adaptation of the novel for a twenty-first century audience. He also knew that Dickens adaptations are ubiquitous at this point. Films are a bit rarer, but every few years a new television adaptation rears its head to keep the authors’ unique world an...
Post a Comment
Read more

Notes on the Title Cards of The Lord of the Rings

It might be sacrilege for one who both considers The Lord of the Rings  trilogy to be one of the greatest triumphs of cinema and has been an avid lover of the films since adolescence, to declare that the original theatrical cuts of the films are better than the much beloved extended editions. Easily it’s my most controversial opinion regarding these movies. Don’t get me wrong, I do like the extended editions quite a lot, especially as someone who just enjoys spending time in that universe. They flesh it out more, add extra flavour, and in increasing the length by about an hour really emphasize the epic quality of these films. But I find that the original cuts are generally more cleanly paced, more seamlessly edited, and much more accessible to audiences. All the stuff there is to love about The Lord of the Rings  is there in the original versions, the plethora of new and extended scenes merely add to that for fans. And of those, they fall into three camps for me: 1....
1 comment
Read more