Skip to main content

When You Can Judge a Book by its Cover


          Free Fire, directed and co-written by Ben Wheatley, is exactly what the title indicates. But for an exposition-laden set-up that comprises the first act, this movie is an hour and a half of about ten people engaged in a massive shoot-out with each other after an arms deal goes awry. This sounds like a concept that would be great for a sequence of an action movie, but can something so basic sustain an entire feature?
          In 1970s Boston, a negotiator (Armie Hammer) and liaison (Brie Larson) broker a deal between two members of the IRA (Cillian Murphy and Michael Smiley) and a South African arms dealer (Sharlto Copley) in a warehouse. Tensions rise however, when the weapons turn out to not be the M-16s that were ordered, and aggressions reach boiling point when one of the the IRA associates (Sam Riley) is revealed to be in a violent feud with one of the dealers’ men (Jack Reynor). Soon, the situation escalates to the point everyone is involved in a bloody free-fire match, each determined to get away with the money, weapons, or vengeance.
          This is a consciously stylistic movie, not just in its content, but how it plays out in real time and in only one setting: the warehouse where the deal’s supposed to take place. Neither of these characteristics are new to movies and it’s always a risk to employ them because of the restrictive narrative problems they pose. Thus when one of these devices succeeds, it’s all the more impressive. And it can certainly be said that Free Fire keeps your attention through using these devices better than some other films. Of course that being said, this is no 12 Angry Men. In fact it’s a lot closer in its violence, set-up, and even musical choices to Reservoir Dogs.
          This movie really has a streak of a Tarantino or a Guy Ritchie film, if not in just its stylized presentation than in its dialogue, which is peppered with that same kind of dark comedy Ritchie is known for. Characters make fun of each other constantly, and trade quips and humourous taunts amid the gunfire. And while this writing for the characters can be very entertaining, the writing for the plot isn’t as strong, with developments added purely to lengthen and justify the runtime. The escalation to the shoot-out is a little too ridiculous and contrived -it’s purely an excuse to get to the free fire. There are a couple new objectives and new characters introduced into the fire-fight who are completely pointless and you can see script beginning to wear thin in these moments. Smaller issues can hurt the movie too. Though it’s kind of an interesting quirk that before anyone dies, everyone’s been shot at least once, it does strain believability how well they can continue to function with so much blood loss. There’s an explanation of sorts, but one guy is shot at least four times and manages to outlive a number of others.
          This is a good cast though. Brie Larson’s better here than she was in Kong: Skull Island, and Armie Hammer’s not bad either. The best performance is probably Cillian Murphy, but he’s usually very good. And I’m glad to see Michael Smiley, an actor who’s had minor roles in tons of British movies and television, given a decent-sized part in this film. Jack Reynor is the only Irish actor in this film playing an American, but he does so alright. Enzo Cilenti and Noah Taylor also appear in this. The only performance that doesn’t work is Sharlto Copley, who plays his part too well to the point you can’t stand his character. It’s overacting an annoying character to the point you’re just waiting for him to die. And that’s saying something when the movie’s got a full cast of horrible people. No one’s really that likeable, and so you’re more curious than invested in who lives and who dies. The two Irish guys are perhaps the least awful, until you remember they’re with the IRA and they immediately become despicable again.
          But this is an action film and in many respects, delivers what it needs. There’s really never a dull moment when something’s not happening. Wheatley, whose previous credits include High-Rise and Peter Capaldi’s first episode of Doctor Who, is also capable of injecting some creativity into the scenario, and an energetic momentum to even the ceasefire moments. And during the banter there are a few good laughs, some fun wit, and even a few really good physical gags.
          Free Fire is a movie whose title tells you everything, and if the idea of people shooting at each other for almost ninety minutes catches your interest, you’ll like this movie. For me, I don’t think it quite sustains its premise, has some shoddy plotting, and borrows a little too heavily from other directors’ styles; though I appreciate seeing risks like this taken, even if they don’t always pan out. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Disney's Mulan, Cultural Appropriation, and Exploitation

I’m late on this one I know. I wasn’t willing to spend thirty bucks back in September for a movie experience I knew was going to be far poorer than if I had paid half that at a theatre. So I waited for it to hit streaming for free to give it a shot. In the meantime I heard that it wasn’t very good, but I remained determined not to skip it entirely, partly out of sympathy for director Niki Caro and partly out of morbid curiosity. Disney’s live-action Mulan  I was actually mildly looking forward to early in the year in spite of my well-documented distaste for this series of creative dead zones by the most powerful media conglomerate on earth. Mulan  was never one of Disney’s classics, a movie extremely of its time in its “girl power” gender politics and with a decidedly American take on ancient Chinese mythology. It got by on a couple good songs and a strong lead, but it was a movie that could be improved upon, and this new version looked like it had the potential to do that, emphasizing

The Hays Code was Bad, Sex in Movies is Good

Don't Look Now (1973) Will Hays, Who Knows About Sex In 1930, former Republican politician and chair of the Motion Picture Association of America Will Hayes introduced a series of self-censorship guidelines for the movie industry in response to a mixture of celebrity scandals and lobbying from the Catholic Church against various ‘immoralities’ creating a perception of Hollywood as corrupt and indecent. The Hays Code, or the Motion Picture Production Code, was formally adopted in 1930, though not stringently enforced until 1934 under the auspices of Joseph Breen. It laid out a careful list of what was and wasn’t acceptable for a film expecting major distribution. It stipulated rules against profanity, the depiction of miscegenation, and offensive portrayals of the clergy, but a lot of it was based around sexual content: “sexual perversion” of any kind was disallowed, as were any opaquely textual or visual allusions to reproduction, and right near the top “No licentious or suggestiv

Pixar Sundays: The Incredibles (2004)

          Brad Bird was already a master by the time he came to Pixar. Not only did he hone his craft as an early director on The Simpsons , but he directed a little animated film for Warner Bros. in 1999, that though not a box office success was loved by critics and quickly grew a cult following. The Iron Giant is now among many people’s favourite animated movies. Likewise, Bird’s feature debut at Pixar, The Incredibles , his own variation of a superhero movie, is often considered one of the studio’s best. And for very good reason, as the most talented director at Pixar shows.            Superheroes were once the world’s greatest crime-fighting force until several lawsuits for collateral damage (and in the case of Mr. Incredible, a hilarious suicide prevention), outlawed their vigilantism. Fifteen years later Mr. Incredible, now living as Bob Parr, has a family with his wife Helen, the former Elastigirl. But Bob, in a combination of mid-life crisis and nostalgia for the old day