Skip to main content

Is this Remake More than a Shell?


          The influence of Ghost in the Shell is pretty clear for everyone who’s seen it. Considered a groundbreaking anime that’s inspired the likes of the Wachowski siblings and James Cameron, it’s a movie with deep societal and psychological themes, that’s only held back by its penchant for excessive dialogue. That being said it has one of the best action scenes I’ve seen in animation.

          Rupert Sanders’ new American adaptation is pretty faithful to the source visually, but does it do enough to stand alone?
          Set in a cyberpunk future, The Major (Scarlett Johansson) is a special ops officer fighting terrorists for the government. In a world where people improving themselves through cybernetic enhancements is common, the Major is unique, being a fully synthetic person save for a human brain. After a series of scientists are murdered, the Major tracks down the criminal genius behind them, along the way discovering a conspiracy relating to her past.
          Though this film retains a lot of the style and atmosphere of the original, it changes the story pretty significantly in a number of places. The mystery is streamlined and much more closely connected to the Major, her journey stemming out of a few plot points we’ve seen in similar movies. Secret pasts and fabricated memories are concepts not new to A.I. fiction and this film doesn’t handle them badly, just not in a particularly interesting way. Certain important ideas like the nature of ‘ghosts’ isn’t given enough focus in favour of a plot and concepts easier to follow. This is not entirely a bad thing though, as it differentiates this movie, and the story we do get is engaging, just not ambitious enough. The movie does a great job emphasizing the connectiveness of this world, almost a cautionary tale on the current rate of technological progression. The humanity vs. machine conflict appears here as well. However it also sidesteps one of the more fascinating characteristics of Ghost in the Shell in its philosophy and the discussion of gender and sexual identity. Those themes are still present just much less explored. Perhaps it’s a side-effect of the rating drop to PG-13 which also disallows some of the more intense violence and nudity (however it does get away with the incredibly skin-tight suit the Major wears).
          Scarlett Johansson’s casting was a huge subject of controversy when it was announced, which is understandable. There’s an explanation in this movie though and regardless, she plays the part fine. She doesn’t imbue the Major with a lot of emotion or personality, but then that was true of the original character, and you could argue this makes sense for a cybernetic person. They are called shells after all. She relates the conflict of her character’s being and curiosities rather well and is a fairly likeable protagonist. Pilou Asbæk plays her partner Batou and is pretty good as far as that character’s concerned. Michael Pitt, Takeshi Kitano, Peter Ferdinando, and Juliette Binoche round out the cast, each giving decent performances but more or less playing archetypal roles with the occasional great moment. 
          The visuals in this movie are spectacular. The world of Ghost in the Shell is in some ways a general cyberpunk environment, but it has character to it. Clearly it’s lifted from numerous animes of this genre but with a sprinkling of Blade Runner and it makes for a very compelling world. The technology also looks striking and unique, from robotic geisha girls, to the holographic projections, to mechanical spider-tanks. And as for the aesthetic, it really tries to replicate the original. The aforementioned action scene, in a flooded slum, is played out here using a lot of the same shots, and though it’s not quite as impressive it still looks good. The opening sequence is the same, showcasing the evolution of the synthetic body, and it too looks exceptional. The action scenes are overall well choreographed and none of the CG looks too bad, with a couple exceptions. There are a number of slow motion effects carried over from the anime that are sometimes tedious, but generally inoffensive. And I’d cut them some slack given this was the property that inspired that gimmick in The Matrix. Almost in response to the whitewashing controversy, this movie makes a point to keep as much of a Japanese context as possible. This extends to the music as well which is beautifully ominous and tonally perfect, favouring electronic synthesizers and a very melancholy air of mystery.
          Ghost in the Shell has a few narrative problems and a degree of derivativeness, and it’s not as ambitious as it could be, but it’s still fairly interesting, ably performed, and terrifically scored. The world is masterfully realized and the visuals a marvel. But it won’t win over everyone. It’s a slower paced, less exuberant sci-fi film than a lot of audiences are used to. I suppose in the end, it’s as good as the original Ghost in the Shell, which I feel is a fine but not great movie. It’s enough I think, to satisfy fans and with any luck, attract new ones.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Strange History of the American Spoof Movie

Parody movies have been around for a lot longer than we tend to think of them. Even from the earliest days of Hollywood there were movies meant to satirize a particular subject or genre. In the silent era, Buster Keaton was responsible for a few. And in the early sound era, almost as soon as the monster pictures took off did you see comic versions of them -Abbott and Costello hosting a few. But parody movies tended to be subtle for most of cinema history, or parody came in conjunction with another goal of the comedy. It really wasn’t until the 1980s and 90s that it took off and became popularly understood. And there is perhaps a line to be drawn to the counterculture comedy explosion that began in the 1970s through avenues like  Saturday Night Live , which frequently parodied from even its earliest years popular movies and cultural properties of the time. But that is still a way’s back. To my generation though, ‘parody movie’ is perhaps a less known term than the more blunt ‘s...

Notes on the Title Cards of The Lord of the Rings

It might be sacrilege for one who both considers The Lord of the Rings  trilogy to be one of the greatest triumphs of cinema and has been an avid lover of the films since adolescence, to declare that the original theatrical cuts of the films are better than the much beloved extended editions. Easily it’s my most controversial opinion regarding these movies. Don’t get me wrong, I do like the extended editions quite a lot, especially as someone who just enjoys spending time in that universe. They flesh it out more, add extra flavour, and in increasing the length by about an hour really emphasize the epic quality of these films. But I find that the original cuts are generally more cleanly paced, more seamlessly edited, and much more accessible to audiences. All the stuff there is to love about The Lord of the Rings  is there in the original versions, the plethora of new and extended scenes merely add to that for fans. And of those, they fall into three camps for me: 1....

Back to the Feature: New York, New York (1977)

New York, New York  is a two hour forty minute musical movie largely about a toxic relationship and I understand why it was Martin Scorsese’s first big flop. Some have blamed its poor reception on the kind of movie it was, of a style and tone Scorsese wasn’t known for, but I find that hard to believe. Even after only five films, he’d proven himself an extremely versatile director, and Alice Doesn’t Live Here Anymore  found an audience. Sure this jazz musical love letter to New York City was following up Taxi Driver and its’ far more cynical take on the city, but then it’s also ‘from the director of Taxi Driver ’ which itself was a big hit. Was it a matter of public appetite for musicals, or mere word of mouth and early critical reception that dissuaded viewers? Irrespective of that, I was stunned to discover this movie was the origin of the titular song, which I’d assumed was much older (it’s definitely got the sound of something that might have come out of the Jazz sce...