Skip to main content

Going in Style tries to Prove that Old People Are Funny


          Going in Style is one of the most unexpected remakes in recent memory. The original 1979 comedy starring George Burns, Art Carney, and Lee Strasberg, has been forgotten by most except evidently for Zach Braff (yeah, the guy from Scrubs) who directed this modern version. But is a story about three old men undertaking a heist worthy of two movies?
          Senior citizen Joe (Michael Caine) witnesses a robbery during an unpleasant bank appointment about his mortgage. Later when the company he used to work for is bought out, and the restructuring process cancels his pension, he recruits his friends and fellow victims Willie (Morgan Freeman) and Albert (Alan Arkin) to plan a bank robbery of their own and get back the money they rightfully deserve.
          Having never seen the original I can’t comment on how this new movie compares, but this plot is pretty paper thin. It’s exactly what you’d expect in both direction and tone. There are decent character moments, such as when we see Joe or Willie bond with their grandchildren, and a couple moments that are played seriously towards the end, but generally the story’s path always leads back to the central joke of “three old guys committing a robbery”. Most of the comedy is in service of that and it doesn’t take long for it to get tiring. There are only a small handful of laughs in this film, and that’s because the novelty of old men trying to steal from a grocery store, trying weed for the first time, or just all round moving slowly isn’t as funny as the filmmakers think. A movie can’t get by an old people jokes anymore. On the contrary, the excess focus on age can on be a little depressing at times. I don’t like to hear greats like Caine, Freeman, and Arkin predicting when they’re going to die.The writing is not that smart, and the direction isn’t in anyway comically unique. And the humour also plays really safe, remaining largely predictable and inoffensive. There are exceptions of course, the occasional delivery from one of the leads, and at least one great physical joke. The funniest material comes from Christopher Lloyd who plays one of their lodge friends who has severe dementia, but even those jokes are mostly one-note. Lloyd just happens to be able to make them entertaining. 
          Really there are only three things this movie has going for it and they are Michael Caine, Morgan Freeman, and Alan Arkin. They’re all great legends of actors and though comedy is none of their biggest strengths (except perhaps for Arkin), they’re good enough and their chemistry is strong enough that they hold your attention. There’s a very believable friendship between them and that’s the films’ backbone. None of their characters are that well defined, apart from the roles these three usually play of late. Caine is disgruntled but passionate, Arkin is sarcastic and cynical, and Freeman is essentially the same guy as in The Bucket List and Last Vegas (this is also his sixth time in a film alongside Caine). But you sympathize with these guys for the horrible system that’s screwing them over. And for that there is some investment in the success of their heist. Overall they are enjoyable, and seeing as they’re on screen almost the whole movie, they distract from the major problems that would’ve sunk this film had it been cast with lesser actors. The supporting cast do a good job too for what it’s worth. From John Ortiz as their guide to mass theft, to Ann-Margret (who looks just like she did twenty years ago) as Alberts’ love interest; Joey King as Joe’s granddaughter, Peter Serafinowicz as her drug selling father, and a surprising Matt Dillon as an FBI agent.
          Going in Style is technically not a good movie. It has way too little substance and lacklustre comedy that relies far too much on the same kind of jokes. But it is harmless and cute, and is in no way as insulting as other movies currently in theatres. Caine, Freeman, and Arkin carry the lesser material and make for a more enjoyable time than this kind of movie deserves. To be honest, it’s a perfectly good movie to take your parents or grandparents to. They might get some enjoyment out of this set-up and the light comedy, as well as the actors. It’s definitely not worth the full price of admission, but if you were interested by the trailer, it delivers more or less exactly on that. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Disney's Mulan, Cultural Appropriation, and Exploitation

I’m late on this one I know. I wasn’t willing to spend thirty bucks back in September for a movie experience I knew was going to be far poorer than if I had paid half that at a theatre. So I waited for it to hit streaming for free to give it a shot. In the meantime I heard that it wasn’t very good, but I remained determined not to skip it entirely, partly out of sympathy for director Niki Caro and partly out of morbid curiosity. Disney’s live-action Mulan  I was actually mildly looking forward to early in the year in spite of my well-documented distaste for this series of creative dead zones by the most powerful media conglomerate on earth. Mulan  was never one of Disney’s classics, a movie extremely of its time in its “girl power” gender politics and with a decidedly American take on ancient Chinese mythology. It got by on a couple good songs and a strong lead, but it was a movie that could be improved upon, and this new version looked like it had the potential to do that, em...

The Wizard of Oz: Birth of Imagination

“Somewhere over the rainbow, skies are blue; and the dreams that you dare to dream really do come true.” I don’t think I’ve sat down and watched The Wizard of Oz  in more than fifteen years. Among the first things I noticed doing so now in 2019, nearly eighty years to the day of its original release on August 25th, 1939, was the amount of obvious foreshadowing in the first twenty minutes. The farmhands are each equated with their later analogues through blatant metaphors and personality quirks (Huck’s “head made out of straw” comment), Professor Marvel is clearly a fraud in spite of his good nature, Dorothy at one point straight up calls Miss Gulch a “wicked old witch”. We don’t notice these things watching the film as children, or maybe we do and reason that it doesn’t matter. It still doesn’t matter. Despite being the part of the movie we’re not supposed to care about, the portrait of a dreary Kansas bedighted by one instant icon of a song, those opening sce...

So I Guess Comics Kingdom Sucks Now...

So, I guess Comics Kingdom sucks now. The website run by King Features Syndicate hosting a bunch of their licensed comic strips from classics like Beetle Bailey , Blondie , and Dennis the Menace  to great new strips like Retail , The Pajama Diaries , and Edison Lee  (as well as Sherman’s Lagoon , Zits , On the Fastrack , etc.) underwent a major relaunch early last week that is in just about every way a massive downgrade. The problems are numerous. The layout is distracting and cheap, far more space is allocated for ads so the strips themselves are displayed too small, the banner from which you could formerly browse for other strips is gone (meaning you have to go to the homepage to find other comics you like or discover new ones), the comments section is a joke –not refreshing itself daily so that every comment made on an individual strip remains attached to ALL strips, there’s no more blog or special features on individual comics pages which effectively barricades the ...