Skip to main content

Why Princess Mononoke is the Best Environmental Film


          Environmental messages have been appearing in movies for decades, but rarely do they succeed. This is because a lot of these movies take on simplistic stances and convey an albeit good-intentioned message with such a blatant lack of nuance that it becomes incredibly irritating. Thus films like FernGully, On Deadly Ground, Pocahontas, The Lorax (2012), and Avatar are pretty grating to sit through (though in fairness each of those films have a number of other problems). With so many failures, is there a film that imparts a good and intelligent conservationist message?
          As you might have guessed by the title, yes. Twenty years ago it came in the form of Hayao Miyazaki’s mystical epic, Princess Mononoke. This is a film that’s already visually marvellous, expertly told, and brimming with relatable memorable characters. The story is about a warrior in ancient Japan who while seeking a cure for a terminal injury becomes involved in the war between an industrial town, the spirits of the forest and their human princess. From the sounds of it, it’s the basic humans vs. nature plot with the humans wanting to use the forest for resources and the noble princess defending it against their evils. Which in some respect it is, but not nearly as cut and dry, and far more interesting.
          Unlike so many western movies of this sort, Princess Mononoke doesn’t vilify anyone. Though adversaries, both village leader Eboshi and San (“Princess Mononoke” being Irontown’s nickname for her) are relatable complex characters. Eboshi is clear-cutting the forest for iron, but she’s also a leader who genuinely cares for her people providing a home and livelihood for all kinds of outcasts. In fact under her, the town is pretty much run by former prostitutes. Likewise San is defending the forest and spirits justly, but she’s not as capable or knowledgeable as she thinks. Her determination and passion are admirable but she’s incapable of sympathizing with the people of Irontown or any humans for that matter. What we have then are very human characters, neither evil nor good, just trying to protect their own and survive. The audience is made to understand where both are coming from. Eboshi like many real people may be doing the wrong thing, but she’s coming from a place of good intentions. And admit it, we’ve all met someone like San -someone who’s so resolute in their ideology that compromise or understanding with the “other” is tantamount to surrender. You see this particularly with regards to politics. And like politics, each side is in the wrong as much as the right. This is rather obvious with Eboshi and the people of Irontown who see the forest spirits as inhibiting their progress and who Eboshi takes a little too much pleasure in harassing. But the spirits aren’t necessarily in the right either and have their own shortcomings. They keep to their kin and none of the forest tribes see eye to eye. The apes wish to eat Ashitaka and thus consume his power to take on the humans, Okkoto leads the boars in an offensive against the humans, and Moro the wolf spirit is more cautious and pessimistic in light of the humans’ new weapons. They’re united in their hatred of the humans but not in their means of dealing with them. These animals though, have no more mercy for humans than the humans for them, epitomized in Moro’s vow to brutally kill Eboshi. San shares this desire and when she fights Eboshi in the centre of the town, their mutual loathing is apparent. But neither of these characters is our protagonist, even though San gives the film its’ title. The audience isn’t meant to identify with San, but rather with Ashitaka. And that may be key to why this film is the best environmentally themed movie; because its hero embodies a middle ground. 
          Both the people of Irontown and San accuse Ashitaka of being “one of them” throughout this movie, because he’s someone who understands and sympathizes with both sides. He’s neutral and strives to achieve the best outcome for everyone. Perhaps my favourite scene is when Ashitaka, who at this point is among the spirits and in San’s good graces, is with Moro looking out over the forest, and Moro bemoans the coming war while also making no effort to hide her hatred of him. During this conversation Ashitaka asks “why can’t the humans and the forest live together? Why can’t we stop this fighting now?” He doesn’t get an answer. “The humans are gathering for the final battle -the flames of their guns will burn us all” Moro deflects the question, stubborn and cold as ever. She’s supposed to be a representative of nature yet she’s filled with hate even in part for her own adopted daughter San, whom she acknowledges as being a creature, ‘neither human nor wolf’. Ashitaka is consistently the most reasonable person in any given scene, and maybe it’s his fate that evokes his compassion for the mostly good people of Irontown as well as his understanding of the value in the Great Forest. He really is the person we should be, sympathetic to nature while still connected to humanity. He carries with him a scar inflicted by a boar spirit, the corruption on his arm that he’ll eventually succumb to, yet he doesn’t hold it against Okkoto or the other boars when he meets them. And though he disagrees with what Eboshi’s doing to the forest, he understands that she’s made a better life for her people and respects her for that. Ashitaka’s particularly unique portrayal for this kind of movie makes him one of Miyazaki’s best characters and speaks to Miyazaki’s interpretation of the relationship humans have with the world.
          Miyazaki’s wise enough to understand that nature isn’t something external which humans need to protect, but that humans are intricately a part of. And it informs his viewpoint in this film. He populates the forest in this movie with the spirits that are integral aspects of Japanese folklore; spirits that though ethereal, other-worldly, and in the case of the Great Spirit of the Forest, godly, are very human in attitude. This all the more connects the world of the spirits to that of the humans and the ideal balance he’s advocating here. And of course a human is the only one who can return the head of the Great Spirit at the end. But while the conflict is largely resolved for now, things aren’t fixed at this point and Miyazaki doesn’t provide us with a means to achieve this balance. Princess Mononoke at its core is a movie that refuses to give its audience easy answers. It instead compels them to look for new answers to combat ecological destruction that maintain humanity’s place within nature.
          None of this is all that new to Miyazaki; he has had environmental themes in his films before, in Castle in the Sky, My Neighbour Totoro, and most notably Nausicaa of the Valley of the Wind which depicts a post-apocalyptic world brought on by excessive pollution. But this film is the most head-on he’s addressed them, by literally pitting humans against the spirits of the natural world. What puts him head over shoulders above other directors of this subject matter is that there’s no impression in Princess Mononoke that nature is good and mankind is evil. Both are far more complex than that.
          Princess Mononoke is already a pretty phenomenal film on a technical level. It’s beautifully creative, ably performed, and has some of the greatest animation you’ll ever see. But it’s this handling of the environmental themes that really elevates it. This movie portrays humanity and nature as equally flawed but necessary for the other to endure. And because there’s no cookie-cutter villain, diabolical scheme, and actual subtlety, the message of this film actually works. Where something like Avatar leaves you insulted, and is condescending to the point you come out of it indifferent if not outright bitter to nature, Princess Mononoke leaves you genuinely inspired and willing to do your part to make a healthier world. It avoids the tropes and hackneyed morals of most environmental films, as well as other clichés; Ashitaka and San don’t get together in the end. Nor should they, because again it would be chaining Ashitaka to one end of the spectrum. He, like us, must occupy and exemplify the best of both worlds. That is to have the spirits’ reverence for nature but maintain human values and reason. It’s just as Ashitaka and San’s last conversation, with optimistic words we should heed: 
          “Even if all the trees return it won’t be his forest anymore. The Great Forest Spirit is dead now.” 
          “Never. He’s life itself, he’s not dead San. He’s here right now trying to tell us something: that it’s time for both of us to live.”

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Strange History of the American Spoof Movie

Parody movies have been around for a lot longer than we tend to think of them. Even from the earliest days of Hollywood there were movies meant to satirize a particular subject or genre. In the silent era, Buster Keaton was responsible for a few. And in the early sound era, almost as soon as the monster pictures took off did you see comic versions of them -Abbott and Costello hosting a few. But parody movies tended to be subtle for most of cinema history, or parody came in conjunction with another goal of the comedy. It really wasn’t until the 1980s and 90s that it took off and became popularly understood. And there is perhaps a line to be drawn to the counterculture comedy explosion that began in the 1970s through avenues like  Saturday Night Live , which frequently parodied from even its earliest years popular movies and cultural properties of the time. But that is still a way’s back. To my generation though, ‘parody movie’ is perhaps a less known term than the more blunt ‘s...

Notes on the Title Cards of The Lord of the Rings

It might be sacrilege for one who both considers The Lord of the Rings  trilogy to be one of the greatest triumphs of cinema and has been an avid lover of the films since adolescence, to declare that the original theatrical cuts of the films are better than the much beloved extended editions. Easily it’s my most controversial opinion regarding these movies. Don’t get me wrong, I do like the extended editions quite a lot, especially as someone who just enjoys spending time in that universe. They flesh it out more, add extra flavour, and in increasing the length by about an hour really emphasize the epic quality of these films. But I find that the original cuts are generally more cleanly paced, more seamlessly edited, and much more accessible to audiences. All the stuff there is to love about The Lord of the Rings  is there in the original versions, the plethora of new and extended scenes merely add to that for fans. And of those, they fall into three camps for me: 1....

Back to the Feature: New York, New York (1977)

New York, New York  is a two hour forty minute musical movie largely about a toxic relationship and I understand why it was Martin Scorsese’s first big flop. Some have blamed its poor reception on the kind of movie it was, of a style and tone Scorsese wasn’t known for, but I find that hard to believe. Even after only five films, he’d proven himself an extremely versatile director, and Alice Doesn’t Live Here Anymore  found an audience. Sure this jazz musical love letter to New York City was following up Taxi Driver and its’ far more cynical take on the city, but then it’s also ‘from the director of Taxi Driver ’ which itself was a big hit. Was it a matter of public appetite for musicals, or mere word of mouth and early critical reception that dissuaded viewers? Irrespective of that, I was stunned to discover this movie was the origin of the titular song, which I’d assumed was much older (it’s definitely got the sound of something that might have come out of the Jazz sce...