Skip to main content

Nostalgic Filmmaking


          Some may have noticed the recent Beauty and the Beast remake was marketed less towards a demographic of children, than one of young adults. Even its earliest teasers didn’t say anything about the plot, they relied mostly on the viewer being familiar with the product. From the opening musical cue to the rose imagery and the invitational caption “Be Our Guest” it was clearly from the get-go aiming for an audience of adults who remembered the Disney classic from their childhoods. A lot of subsequent advertising was based around the novelty of seeing clips and songs you’ve seen before now re-enacted in live-action.
          As we eventually saw, that was pretty indicative of the film itself. But though Beauty and the Beast may be the worst recent offender, it’s not alone. In the month of March we’ve been treated to nostalgia for X-Men (Logan), King Kong (Kong: Skull Island), and Power Rangers. This ties into the fact there’s less originality in films, certainly in mainstream release films, than there was in decades past. But we seem specifically to be living through a nostalgia kick for Hollywood, eager to cash in on TV and film we remember from childhood. Right now, the specific target is media from the 80s and 90s, which only makes sense. The children of those decades are now adults trying to make their way in a tough and often unfulfilling world. And so those icons of their past, those reminders of a simpler time are a very attractive escape in 2017 whether they be Smurfs, Baywatch, Alien, Transformers, Star Wars, Jumanji, Pirates of the Caribbean, and of course comic book movies galore.
          Clearly Hollywood’s in the business now of cashing in on name-brands in order to manipulate a specific demographic. It isn’t exclusive to movies either. We live in an age now where Full House, McGyver, Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles, and DuckTales are all on TV, just like in the early 90’s. The only reason Riverdale is as popular as it is is because it’s a dark re-imagining of Archie comics characters. Everyone’s read an Archie comic or two growing up.
          On the one-hand this is a bit excessive and creatively limiting. But on the other, it’s interesting to see characters and worlds we know being looked at from a new perspective. There has to be a reason for example, for this new Smurfs film, apart from just being that Smurfs exist and people like them. When that new perspective isn’t taken advantage of, you get stuff like Beauty and the Beast. The Transformers movies likewise have a long history of pandering to their audiences and offering nothing fresh. But nostalgic media can also breathe life into familiar properties, make them feel new and interesting. As goofy as it may be, the idea of the Archie cast in a Twin Peaks-style murder mystery sounds enjoyably bizarre. It doesn’t have to be this extreme a gimmick though. I’m looking forward to the DuckTales reboot in part because that kind of adventure show just isn’t done anymore. Same with Netflix’s upcoming Mystery Science Theatre revival. But I do expect changes where necessary.
          Perhaps the bigger conundrum is whether this onslaught of 80s and 90s nostalgia is hindering the creation of new nostalgia for the next generation. The idea of not letting good ideas and good stories die only goes so far.
          It should be borne in mind that just because nostalgic TV and movies being resurrected on film is a larger-scale enterprise now, it’s not new. Back in the 80s and 90s it was nostalgic TV from the 60s and 70s that was being rebooted: Dragnet, The Addams Family, The Fugitive, The Flintstones, The Brady Bunch Movie, The Avengers, My Favourite Martian, Wild Wild West, Charlie’s Angels, and Mission Impossible -still a running film franchise to this day! -to name just a few.
          We are being inundated with reboots of nostalgia today and it does look like Hollywood’s just trying to make a quick buck, but there are original ideas in film and TV to break through the recycled material. Disney may be making soulless remakes like Maleficent, and Beauty and the Beast (not to mention Mulan, Aladdin, The Lion King, The Little Mermaid, Peter Pan, 101 Dalmatians, and Dumbo all in development), but they’re still giving us new classics like Frozen, Inside Out, and Moana. Among all the 80s and 90s TV shows being remade on film and television, we’re still getting new greats like Stranger Things and Steven Universe that kids of today will carry with them into the future (and no doubt begin rebooting around 2030). And let’s not forget not every nostalgic reboot has been bad. For every Ben-Hur and Jem and the Holograms, there’s a Mad Max: Fury Road and The Peanuts Movie. As sure as Hollywood’s always going to return to the well of nostalgia to rein in audiences, there will always be an abundance to choose from.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Disney's Mulan, Cultural Appropriation, and Exploitation

I’m late on this one I know. I wasn’t willing to spend thirty bucks back in September for a movie experience I knew was going to be far poorer than if I had paid half that at a theatre. So I waited for it to hit streaming for free to give it a shot. In the meantime I heard that it wasn’t very good, but I remained determined not to skip it entirely, partly out of sympathy for director Niki Caro and partly out of morbid curiosity. Disney’s live-action Mulan  I was actually mildly looking forward to early in the year in spite of my well-documented distaste for this series of creative dead zones by the most powerful media conglomerate on earth. Mulan  was never one of Disney’s classics, a movie extremely of its time in its “girl power” gender politics and with a decidedly American take on ancient Chinese mythology. It got by on a couple good songs and a strong lead, but it was a movie that could be improved upon, and this new version looked like it had the potential to do that, emphasizing

The Hays Code was Bad, Sex in Movies is Good

Don't Look Now (1973) Will Hays, Who Knows About Sex In 1930, former Republican politician and chair of the Motion Picture Association of America Will Hayes introduced a series of self-censorship guidelines for the movie industry in response to a mixture of celebrity scandals and lobbying from the Catholic Church against various ‘immoralities’ creating a perception of Hollywood as corrupt and indecent. The Hays Code, or the Motion Picture Production Code, was formally adopted in 1930, though not stringently enforced until 1934 under the auspices of Joseph Breen. It laid out a careful list of what was and wasn’t acceptable for a film expecting major distribution. It stipulated rules against profanity, the depiction of miscegenation, and offensive portrayals of the clergy, but a lot of it was based around sexual content: “sexual perversion” of any kind was disallowed, as were any opaquely textual or visual allusions to reproduction, and right near the top “No licentious or suggestiv

Pixar Sundays: The Incredibles (2004)

          Brad Bird was already a master by the time he came to Pixar. Not only did he hone his craft as an early director on The Simpsons , but he directed a little animated film for Warner Bros. in 1999, that though not a box office success was loved by critics and quickly grew a cult following. The Iron Giant is now among many people’s favourite animated movies. Likewise, Bird’s feature debut at Pixar, The Incredibles , his own variation of a superhero movie, is often considered one of the studio’s best. And for very good reason, as the most talented director at Pixar shows.            Superheroes were once the world’s greatest crime-fighting force until several lawsuits for collateral damage (and in the case of Mr. Incredible, a hilarious suicide prevention), outlawed their vigilantism. Fifteen years later Mr. Incredible, now living as Bob Parr, has a family with his wife Helen, the former Elastigirl. But Bob, in a combination of mid-life crisis and nostalgia for the old day