Skip to main content

A Magnificent Send-Off for Logan


          Hugh Jackman has been Wolverine for seventeen years. He’s been a superhero long before the modern superhero phenomenon and in nearly two decades has been a staple of the X-Men franchise, appearing in all eight movies preceding this one. Logan, directed by James Mangold is his final appearance as the character. Thus it’s important he go out on a high note.
          Essentially the movie Logan is Children of Men with superheroes. Luckily, Children of Men is one of my favourite movies, and Logan I liked a lot as well.
          The year is 2029 and mutants are on the verge of extinction due to deterioration of the mutant gene. Logan (Hugh Jackman) is working as a limousine driver in New Mexico, while also caring for a frail unstable Charles Xavier (Patrick Stewart), housed in an abandoned plant across the border. When he crosses paths with a young Latina girl called Laura (Dafne Keen) who has similar powers to his, he and Charles attempt to transport her to North Dakota and the Canadian border before enforcers of a sinister government program recapture her.
          This story is remarkably simple and straightforward for a superhero film. It’s mostly just a road trip to get someone across the border to safety. And yes, that theme does feel especially relevant in the modern political climate. Because there isn’t a lot of grand exposition and plot, the film’s allowed to focus a lot more on mood, which it does superbly. This is by far the best shot X-Men movie. There’s a lot of driving through the desert, evoking westerns like Hell or High Water, Unforgiven or even Shane which features in this movie in a clearly metaphorical role. Although there are a number of heavy action sequences, the movie has quiet reflective moments as well. These not only balance out the bloodier moments, but give the audience a chance to bask in the ambience of a scene or Logans’ state of mind. And often they’re framed in a very picturesque way. There’s a rawness to everything, not just brought on by the violence, but the bleak presentation of the characters’ circumstances and the world itself. This is actually kind of ironic considering X-Men in 2000 aspired to the campy comic elements with no shame and this film (supposedly in the same continuity) is rejecting them almost entirely.
          I find it slightly funny that Logan’s characterized as an old man throughout this movie, but Hugh Jackman still looks not much more than middle-aged. That incongruity aside, this is Jackman’s finest hour as the character. You feel what he’s been through, the crumbling of his world and the reason he’s constantly bitter. Never before has there been so much pain on his shoulders, never has he been so broken, and it all comes through in Jackmans’ nuanced performance. It’s only fitting that the X-Men franchise’s most character-driven movie by far, sees that character at his best. And also at his worst, seeing as he’s more vulnerable and weakened than ever, unable to heal himself like he used to. The perfect foil for him is Laura, and newcomer Dafne Keen is amazing. Almost solely through her physical performance she creates a figure with a disturbing past, but someone who clearly cares a lot about her quest, the sliver of hope it poses, and who is both awesome in combat and reticently engaging. Her relationship with Logan which is arguably the films’ backbone, is close but distant. In some ways its development is cliché, but both characters invest you enough on their own, that you welcome it. And what can I say for Patrick Stewart? He simply is one of the best, and rounds out this trio brilliantly. It’s fascinating to see how Charles’ relationship with Logan has evolved, and Stewart performs multiple scenes so skilfully and with such emotion it’s almost heartbreaking. He’s as sweet as the character’s always been, but the dementia of his mental powers which endanger himself and others, adds a new layer of sympathy. The supporting cast consists of a despicable Boyd Holbrook, a surprisingly versatile Stephen Merchant, and an enigmatic Richard E. Grant, all of whom are great.
          There are problematic elements to Logan though. At the end of the second act a new adversary is introduced who works okay but feels a little too silly in contrast to the grave tone. There’s also the fact that X-Men comics exist in this universe, which though it serves a point, also feels tonally out of place. The comic relief in general is often the same way, with jokes that seem written to emanate Deadpool. That’s one of the downsides of the R-rating, as this film goes out of its way to exploit that in the early scenes. There are a number of unnecessary F-bombs for instance and a laughably out-of-nowhere bit of nudity. But even though I think a Wolverine movie could work without an R-rating, there’s no denying it made the action sequences the best he’s ever had. The excessive bloodiness isn’t what makes them work as much as the pacing. In concordance with the theme of ageing, Logan’s fighting is like a man past his prime and it makes each sequence more tense and heavy. The impact of each blow feels that much more brutal and makes the danger to our heroes all the more threatening.
          This was Hugh Jackman’s denouement, and I’m confident that if he were to reappear after this, it would cheapen the character. It may be early to call Logan one of the best superhero films, not least because it subverts many of the tenets of that genre, but this feels at least a partially justifiable assessment. The overarching themes are unequivocally mature and I appreciate that this film isn’t afraid to be open-ended. Not everything is answered nor should it be. Again it reminds me a lot of Children of Men in this, how it’s reaching for something beyond the expectations of the comic book movie. What I can say for certain now is its bolder; with powerful performances, a simple yet affecting story and character drama which exceeds expectations. And it will make you cry.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Disney's Mulan, Cultural Appropriation, and Exploitation

I’m late on this one I know. I wasn’t willing to spend thirty bucks back in September for a movie experience I knew was going to be far poorer than if I had paid half that at a theatre. So I waited for it to hit streaming for free to give it a shot. In the meantime I heard that it wasn’t very good, but I remained determined not to skip it entirely, partly out of sympathy for director Niki Caro and partly out of morbid curiosity. Disney’s live-action Mulan  I was actually mildly looking forward to early in the year in spite of my well-documented distaste for this series of creative dead zones by the most powerful media conglomerate on earth. Mulan  was never one of Disney’s classics, a movie extremely of its time in its “girl power” gender politics and with a decidedly American take on ancient Chinese mythology. It got by on a couple good songs and a strong lead, but it was a movie that could be improved upon, and this new version looked like it had the potential to do that, emphasizing

The Hays Code was Bad, Sex in Movies is Good

Don't Look Now (1973) Will Hays, Who Knows About Sex In 1930, former Republican politician and chair of the Motion Picture Association of America Will Hayes introduced a series of self-censorship guidelines for the movie industry in response to a mixture of celebrity scandals and lobbying from the Catholic Church against various ‘immoralities’ creating a perception of Hollywood as corrupt and indecent. The Hays Code, or the Motion Picture Production Code, was formally adopted in 1930, though not stringently enforced until 1934 under the auspices of Joseph Breen. It laid out a careful list of what was and wasn’t acceptable for a film expecting major distribution. It stipulated rules against profanity, the depiction of miscegenation, and offensive portrayals of the clergy, but a lot of it was based around sexual content: “sexual perversion” of any kind was disallowed, as were any opaquely textual or visual allusions to reproduction, and right near the top “No licentious or suggestiv

Pixar Sundays: The Incredibles (2004)

          Brad Bird was already a master by the time he came to Pixar. Not only did he hone his craft as an early director on The Simpsons , but he directed a little animated film for Warner Bros. in 1999, that though not a box office success was loved by critics and quickly grew a cult following. The Iron Giant is now among many people’s favourite animated movies. Likewise, Bird’s feature debut at Pixar, The Incredibles , his own variation of a superhero movie, is often considered one of the studio’s best. And for very good reason, as the most talented director at Pixar shows.            Superheroes were once the world’s greatest crime-fighting force until several lawsuits for collateral damage (and in the case of Mr. Incredible, a hilarious suicide prevention), outlawed their vigilantism. Fifteen years later Mr. Incredible, now living as Bob Parr, has a family with his wife Helen, the former Elastigirl. But Bob, in a combination of mid-life crisis and nostalgia for the old day