Skip to main content

There is No Lion in India


          In 1986, a five year old Indian boy called Saroo wound up on a train to Calcutta, thousands of miles from the village of his birth. After enduring a harsh period of time in Calcutta, first on the streets and then in a run-down orphanage, he was adopted by an Australian couple and raised in Tasmania. More than twenty-five years later, he embarked on a journey to find where he came from and if his biological family was still alive.
          This is the powerful true story being told in Lion, the feature debut from Australian director Garth Davis. The film follows the tribulations of young Saroo in India before detailing his attempts to find his home as an adult played by Dev Patel, and how his obsessive consumption with this affects his relationships with his girlfriend and his adopted family.
          This is an amazing story, and a really uplifting one at that. And it’s really the interest in this story that drives a lot of the film. The intensity and utter hopelessness of Saroo navigating Calcutta at such a young age is completely felt; you share in his terror and vulnerability. In the second half of the film I was expecting Saroo’s journey home to be largely physical: going to India and retracing his roots from there. But keeping to the honesty of the story, the reality is on the surface much less exciting as he does a ton of online research until he finds his village on Google Earth. This sounds incredibly banal, but the movie makes it compelling by focussing on Saroo’s strained relationships as he does this. Though initially set on a promising path to hotel management at Canberra University, he devotes years to this goal, convinced his real family is out there missing him and we see in full the effect this has on the people who love him. In the case of his adoptive parents, he doesn’t even confide what he’s really up to. He’s aided in his online journey by recollecting memories, and I really like the editing choices here. Saroo has visions where he thinks he sees his mother or brother on a familiar terrain and as these memories flood back he ever more clearly narrows his search. Eventually when he walks the same paths he did as a kid he experiences these flashes more vividly. I can tell you from personal experience visiting childhood homes, that this is an accurate sensation captured really well in this movie.
          Dev Patel’s been a rising star for a while now but here he really proves himself with his best performance yet. It’s obvious how important this character and story is to him, he’s putting his all into the role, pulling off a very good Aussie accent in the process. Sunny Pawar who plays the young Saroo is perfectly adorable and sympathetic. Nicole Kidman really shines as Sue, Saroo’s adoptive mother. Motherhood actually winds up being a significant theme in the film because of her performance. There’s one scene where she reveals to Saroo her motivations for adopting him as well as another less stable Indian boy, and it’s a terrific moment bordering on heart-wrenching. Rooney Mara plays Saroo’s girlfriend Lucy, an American student he meets at school. They have pretty good chemistry (Patel in particular is just so charming), but she feels like she was an entirely fictional creation. And it’s nice to see David Wenham again as Saroo’s adoptive father John.
          Lion though is not without its flaws. On a technical level there’s nothing very interesting. The pacing is at times a little slow in the second half, but I might have preferred more development there because I liked the cast and journey so much in comparison to the first half which may have gone on a little too long. There’s only so much depressing, while harsh and detailed imagery of Indian poverty I can take. And that leads to perhaps the most notable thing -that this is very much a message film. It’s a good one, raising awareness of the horrible conditions in the slums of Calcutta and more importantly, how thousands of children like Saroo go missing in those big cities each year. However by the end it slightly crosses the line into being preachy. The film also goes to a few uncomfortable places, particularly hinting at the child sex trade, which I understand as necessary, but they feel tonally at odds with the latter half. Indeed these do feel like two separate movies, which is why I don’t mind that they’re one after the other rather than interspersed as some lesser director might attempt. But it’s still a little too dissonant.
          That being said however, this film is especially impressive for a debut director, and features rightfully acclaimed performances from Kidman and Patel, some important themes, and quite a good soundtrack. Most of all Lion is an exceptionally good, legitimately emotional and potent story, that intrigues you long after the credits roll.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Disney's Mulan, Cultural Appropriation, and Exploitation

I’m late on this one I know. I wasn’t willing to spend thirty bucks back in September for a movie experience I knew was going to be far poorer than if I had paid half that at a theatre. So I waited for it to hit streaming for free to give it a shot. In the meantime I heard that it wasn’t very good, but I remained determined not to skip it entirely, partly out of sympathy for director Niki Caro and partly out of morbid curiosity. Disney’s live-action Mulan  I was actually mildly looking forward to early in the year in spite of my well-documented distaste for this series of creative dead zones by the most powerful media conglomerate on earth. Mulan  was never one of Disney’s classics, a movie extremely of its time in its “girl power” gender politics and with a decidedly American take on ancient Chinese mythology. It got by on a couple good songs and a strong lead, but it was a movie that could be improved upon, and this new version looked like it had the potential to do that, em...

The Wizard of Oz: Birth of Imagination

“Somewhere over the rainbow, skies are blue; and the dreams that you dare to dream really do come true.” I don’t think I’ve sat down and watched The Wizard of Oz  in more than fifteen years. Among the first things I noticed doing so now in 2019, nearly eighty years to the day of its original release on August 25th, 1939, was the amount of obvious foreshadowing in the first twenty minutes. The farmhands are each equated with their later analogues through blatant metaphors and personality quirks (Huck’s “head made out of straw” comment), Professor Marvel is clearly a fraud in spite of his good nature, Dorothy at one point straight up calls Miss Gulch a “wicked old witch”. We don’t notice these things watching the film as children, or maybe we do and reason that it doesn’t matter. It still doesn’t matter. Despite being the part of the movie we’re not supposed to care about, the portrait of a dreary Kansas bedighted by one instant icon of a song, those opening sce...

So I Guess Comics Kingdom Sucks Now...

So, I guess Comics Kingdom sucks now. The website run by King Features Syndicate hosting a bunch of their licensed comic strips from classics like Beetle Bailey , Blondie , and Dennis the Menace  to great new strips like Retail , The Pajama Diaries , and Edison Lee  (as well as Sherman’s Lagoon , Zits , On the Fastrack , etc.) underwent a major relaunch early last week that is in just about every way a massive downgrade. The problems are numerous. The layout is distracting and cheap, far more space is allocated for ads so the strips themselves are displayed too small, the banner from which you could formerly browse for other strips is gone (meaning you have to go to the homepage to find other comics you like or discover new ones), the comments section is a joke –not refreshing itself daily so that every comment made on an individual strip remains attached to ALL strips, there’s no more blog or special features on individual comics pages which effectively barricades the ...