Skip to main content

Hiding in Plain Sight


          Hidden Figures has one of those annoying but appropriate double meaning titles that you often find with true story movies. It refers both to the complex mathematics in astrophysics as well as to the social status of this films’ three central characters: a trio of African-American women working at NASA in the early 1960s. 
          Katherine Goble (Taraji P. Henson) is a brilliant mathematician working in a minor segregated computer department at NASA alongside Dorothy Vaughan (Octavia Spencer) who runs that department but hasn’t the job title or pay of a supervisor, and Mary Jackson (Janelle Monae) an outspoken and ambitious engineer. When the Space Team director (Kevin Costner) calls upon Katherine to work on the numbers for the plan to launch a man into space, she and her friends do all they can to prove they can contribute to the mission just as well as any of the white men working on it.
          This is an incredibly typical story, playing out exactly as any other story about people overcoming racial discrimination would. It’s not a very well-written movie either and a subplot about Katherine’s romance with a military man Jim Johnson (Mahershala Ali) seems added just to fill the runtime and has little relevance on the NASA plot. The three heroines are expectedly facing an upwards climb throughout the whole movie and have to fight the powers that believe the colour of their skin and to a lesser extent, their gender, prevents them from contributing meaningfully to the launch. What does work however is the situation. 
          The space race was an interesting point in American history, due to how vast amounts science and innovation were put into a project not so much about exploring and learning as about beating the evil Russians. And so the story set against this backdrop is an interesting one, and as such the characters are similarly interesting, likeable, and worth following.
          I like when a movie really makes me believe in the characters and Taraji P. Henson plays Katherine’s mathematical brilliance and subdued frustration very well. Yeah, there’s a point where she does the Will Hunting thing of proving her genius by writing a complex formula on a blackboard, but her intelligence seems believable enough. Janelle Monae’s Mary is a lot of fun, at times feeling like she’s a black woman from the modern era transplanted in the 60’s due to her candid attitude about discrimination and perseverance in improving herself to NASA qualifications even if she doesn’t need them. Octavia Spencer as Dorothy is perhaps the most enjoyable of the trio, a fun and funny character who feels a little left out that her two friends are making strides where she is not. And the chemistry between these ladies is very good, ensuring the film doesn’t ever become too monotonous. The rest of the cast aren’t quite as impressive. Ali is fine, but after the performance he gave in Moonlight I was expecting so much more out of what’s here a pretty bland character. Kevin Costner is decent as the guy giving Katherine a chance and even standing up for her from time to time. But he’s surrounded by the typical racist jerks you encounter in these kind of movies played by Kirsten Dunst and Jim Parsons (essentially just playing the same one-note role as on The Big Bang Theory). Glen Powell is playing up the charm as John Glenn, though I have to wonder if he really was as open-minded as the film makes him just because he was a national hero. The bigots in this movie are characters not likely based on specific people.
          For the generic racial discrimination scenes we get like Dorothy riding with her kids at the back of the bus after being kicked out of the library for reading in the white section, there are a couple sequences that work. Most notable is a (literal) running gag that turns into something serious about how Katherine has to run a half-hour to another building to use the only coloured bathroom in the facility. These brief sequences, the Pharrell Williams song that accompanies them, and their ultimate culmination are actually very impactful.
          Hidden Figures though not executed in any way uniquely for this kind of film is an important story. It’s one of those stories I do feel better for now knowing. The movie’s not great by any means but it’s saved by this legitimately interesting story and likeable characters. At the end I wanted to know a little more about what these women accomplished, especially with regards to the even bigger mission later that decade, landing a man on the moon. And when a film compels you to do some added research yourself, that’s a sign it did something right.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Disney's Mulan, Cultural Appropriation, and Exploitation

I’m late on this one I know. I wasn’t willing to spend thirty bucks back in September for a movie experience I knew was going to be far poorer than if I had paid half that at a theatre. So I waited for it to hit streaming for free to give it a shot. In the meantime I heard that it wasn’t very good, but I remained determined not to skip it entirely, partly out of sympathy for director Niki Caro and partly out of morbid curiosity. Disney’s live-action Mulan  I was actually mildly looking forward to early in the year in spite of my well-documented distaste for this series of creative dead zones by the most powerful media conglomerate on earth. Mulan  was never one of Disney’s classics, a movie extremely of its time in its “girl power” gender politics and with a decidedly American take on ancient Chinese mythology. It got by on a couple good songs and a strong lead, but it was a movie that could be improved upon, and this new version looked like it had the potential to do that, emphasizing

The Hays Code was Bad, Sex in Movies is Good

Don't Look Now (1973) Will Hays, Who Knows About Sex In 1930, former Republican politician and chair of the Motion Picture Association of America Will Hayes introduced a series of self-censorship guidelines for the movie industry in response to a mixture of celebrity scandals and lobbying from the Catholic Church against various ‘immoralities’ creating a perception of Hollywood as corrupt and indecent. The Hays Code, or the Motion Picture Production Code, was formally adopted in 1930, though not stringently enforced until 1934 under the auspices of Joseph Breen. It laid out a careful list of what was and wasn’t acceptable for a film expecting major distribution. It stipulated rules against profanity, the depiction of miscegenation, and offensive portrayals of the clergy, but a lot of it was based around sexual content: “sexual perversion” of any kind was disallowed, as were any opaquely textual or visual allusions to reproduction, and right near the top “No licentious or suggestiv

Pixar Sundays: The Incredibles (2004)

          Brad Bird was already a master by the time he came to Pixar. Not only did he hone his craft as an early director on The Simpsons , but he directed a little animated film for Warner Bros. in 1999, that though not a box office success was loved by critics and quickly grew a cult following. The Iron Giant is now among many people’s favourite animated movies. Likewise, Bird’s feature debut at Pixar, The Incredibles , his own variation of a superhero movie, is often considered one of the studio’s best. And for very good reason, as the most talented director at Pixar shows.            Superheroes were once the world’s greatest crime-fighting force until several lawsuits for collateral damage (and in the case of Mr. Incredible, a hilarious suicide prevention), outlawed their vigilantism. Fifteen years later Mr. Incredible, now living as Bob Parr, has a family with his wife Helen, the former Elastigirl. But Bob, in a combination of mid-life crisis and nostalgia for the old day