Skip to main content

Ben Affleck Turns Bootlegger


          For some time now, I’ve been fascinated by Prohibition gangsters. It might have something to do with the fact I used to get paid to play one. Nonetheless I’m still incredibly intrigued by that era, and what it brought out in people, what with the rise of organized crime. The last great prohibition gangster film was Road to Perdition which is unexpectedly a really touching story about a father and son. Ben Affleck’s Live by Night may be trying to be as good, utilizing this world to its fullest.
          The movie, based on the book by Dennis Lehane follows Joe Coughlin (Affleck) a small-time bootlegger from Boston who gets caught in the Italian-Irish gang war between bosses Maso Pescatore (Remo Girone) and Albert White (Robert Glenister) when he falls in love with White’s mistress (Sienna Miller). Eventually, it lands him in Tampa, Florida where he begins to build his own criminal empire. 
          The story of a gangster’s rise to power we’ve seen plenty of times before, but this film does it in some interesting ways. It’s episodic but in a good true-to-life way, feeling very fluent in its movement from one incident to the next. 
          This film looks great. Part of that is due to the setting which really highlights the Tampa area, the tropical atmosphere and Cuban culture. We haven’t seen many gangster films set in this part of America during this time, usually it’s New York, Chicago, or if you watch Boardwalk Empire, Atlantic City. So the environment and the kind of characters it produces are refreshing. The cinematography is excellent as well, Ben Affleck again proving to be a very strong and innovative director.
          There are a few story issues however. It’s very clear this movie’s based on a book given the pacing, particularly in the first act which is too rapid with its exposition and scene placement to develop Joe much as a character, something I have to imagine the book does better. The first act too is very disconnected from the rest of the film. It ends on a major character moment for Joe, but it doesn’t really change him or his ambitions. Even his initial plan for going to Tampa, being part of a quest of vengeance is eventually given up on and it doesn’t make a whole lot of sense. 
          In fact the biggest problem may be with the character of Joe on a whole. Though played adequately by Affleck, the film is advertised with the line: “Joe once was a good man” despite us never seeing that side of him. He fought in the war and we learn that through the opening narration, but the movie makes clear he was a criminal pretty much since he came back from Europe. The inciting incident in his becoming a gangster is never delved into and so there isn’t much investment in his morality. He apparently has a problem with killing people personally but we don’t really understand why. It gives relatively little emotional weight to his character arc. Had he not been already involved in organized crime in the first act it might have worked better. But it’s a major character oversight like this that doesn’t make it as great as Road to Perdition or Boardwalk Empire where the motivations and history of the lead figures were crucial to the audience sympathizing with them. 
          The supporting cast is filled with really good talent though. In addition to Miller, the wonderfully detestable Glenister, and a surprising Girone, Chris Messina plays Joe’s right-hand man Dion while Zoe Saldana plays another love interest Graciela. For what we see of him, Brendan Gleeson is great as usual as Joe’s police chief father, Chris Cooper plays the disciplined chief of Tampa, and Elle Fanning shows some surprising capability as his daughter. Titus Welliver and Anthony Michael Hall even appear in this movie, and the whole cast works together naturally.
          The action scenes are pretty good too. As a film like this promises, we get some good shoot-outs, and though not as bloody as they could more accurately be, they are violent and impactful. As is expected, some deaths act as punctuations, others are more drawn out. And sometimes we get gangs running through a building firing small revolvers and tommy guns.
          Live by Night isn’t a fresh take on the gangster genre and suffers for the significant character problems of its protagonist, a protagonist on whom this whole story hinges. But it does offer plenty of enjoyable performances, a look at the prohibition period from an unusual vantage point, some good action and overall direction. It may not be entirely entertaining if you’re not curious about the era, and the pacing through the second act is more akin to The Godfather than a more action-heavy gangster film, but it is very well-made and though not quite the Oscar calibre it’s probably going for, I definitely had a good enough time with it.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Disney's Mulan, Cultural Appropriation, and Exploitation

I’m late on this one I know. I wasn’t willing to spend thirty bucks back in September for a movie experience I knew was going to be far poorer than if I had paid half that at a theatre. So I waited for it to hit streaming for free to give it a shot. In the meantime I heard that it wasn’t very good, but I remained determined not to skip it entirely, partly out of sympathy for director Niki Caro and partly out of morbid curiosity. Disney’s live-action Mulan  I was actually mildly looking forward to early in the year in spite of my well-documented distaste for this series of creative dead zones by the most powerful media conglomerate on earth. Mulan  was never one of Disney’s classics, a movie extremely of its time in its “girl power” gender politics and with a decidedly American take on ancient Chinese mythology. It got by on a couple good songs and a strong lead, but it was a movie that could be improved upon, and this new version looked like it had the potential to do that, emphasizing

The Hays Code was Bad, Sex in Movies is Good

Don't Look Now (1973) Will Hays, Who Knows About Sex In 1930, former Republican politician and chair of the Motion Picture Association of America Will Hayes introduced a series of self-censorship guidelines for the movie industry in response to a mixture of celebrity scandals and lobbying from the Catholic Church against various ‘immoralities’ creating a perception of Hollywood as corrupt and indecent. The Hays Code, or the Motion Picture Production Code, was formally adopted in 1930, though not stringently enforced until 1934 under the auspices of Joseph Breen. It laid out a careful list of what was and wasn’t acceptable for a film expecting major distribution. It stipulated rules against profanity, the depiction of miscegenation, and offensive portrayals of the clergy, but a lot of it was based around sexual content: “sexual perversion” of any kind was disallowed, as were any opaquely textual or visual allusions to reproduction, and right near the top “No licentious or suggestiv

Pixar Sundays: The Incredibles (2004)

          Brad Bird was already a master by the time he came to Pixar. Not only did he hone his craft as an early director on The Simpsons , but he directed a little animated film for Warner Bros. in 1999, that though not a box office success was loved by critics and quickly grew a cult following. The Iron Giant is now among many people’s favourite animated movies. Likewise, Bird’s feature debut at Pixar, The Incredibles , his own variation of a superhero movie, is often considered one of the studio’s best. And for very good reason, as the most talented director at Pixar shows.            Superheroes were once the world’s greatest crime-fighting force until several lawsuits for collateral damage (and in the case of Mr. Incredible, a hilarious suicide prevention), outlawed their vigilantism. Fifteen years later Mr. Incredible, now living as Bob Parr, has a family with his wife Helen, the former Elastigirl. But Bob, in a combination of mid-life crisis and nostalgia for the old day