Skip to main content

There's Brilliance Behind All That Jazz


          Damian Chazelle’s Whiplash was a surprisingly tense film about a student being pushed to breaking point by a tough and abusive teacher. The film garnered lots of critical praise and earned J.K. Simmons an Oscar. It also showed very clearly that Chazelle has a passion for jazz music, a passion which drives his next film La La Land. And that passion permeates every frame of this film.
          The musical follows a pair of aspiring artists in Hollywood: struggling actress Mia (Emma Stone) and jazz musician Sebastian (Ryan Gosling) who in between auditions, try-outs, and attempts to survive in competitive industries, repeatedly run into each other and fall in love. But it doesn’t end there. What follows is a dramatic exploration of the highs and lows of artists following their dreams.
          This is a movie that loves Hollywood. The classic figures, movies, and aura of golden age Hollywood is romanticized throughout this film, from Mia’s Ingrid Bergman wallpaper to a dance sequence at the Griffith Observatory spurned on by Rebel Without a Cause. There’s also a deep love of jazz history with Sebastian being a purist in the mould of Count Basie and Louis Armstrong. Both Mia and Sebastian want to be performers of a particular calibre, but one of the most interesting things this movie does is it shows the compromises that need to be made. Often, artists are faced with the reality their dreams may not be possible and they’ll have to settle for something less glamorous. This movie explores that without being completely pessimistic about it. It captures the struggle, constant rejection, the stifling of creativity, and does so in a way that’s immediately identifiable even if you aren’t artistically inclined yourself.
          The love story is really engaging too. In some ways it’s clichéd, again in a charming way that takes you back to romantic comedies of the '40s and '50s, but with an updated take on their behaviours and personalities. The result is a terrific portrayal of a relationship, and how success or lack thereof affects it, especially in such a difficult industry. For as much as this movie may love classic Hollywood it doesn’t shy away from the harsh realities, and how difficult it is to make a name there. Both Stone and Gosling are excellent in this, each delivering one of the best performances of their career, and their chemistry is flawless. The small supporting cast consists of singer John Legend, Rosemarie DeWitt, and a great cameo by J.K. Simmons.
          La La Land is incredibly stylish and is intentionally paying tribute to the glamour of the great Hollywood musicals, with perhaps a spot of Broadway in there. There are long shots, a particular focus on lighting and shadows, and often-times stunning production design. The pacing soothes you into a moment, and the surreal choices designed to heighten a mood or illustrate a feeling of excitement, happiness, even regret are absolutely beautiful. And by proxy of that, the quick editing is superb! The choreography is very vibrant and energized, hearkening back to West Side Story, Singin’ in the Rain, An American in Paris, etc. Gosling more than once is channelling Gene Kelly while Stone may be influenced by Judy Garland. But what makes it feel new is the modernization of the setting and characters, as well as the songs themselves. The attention to detail is really engrossing as well. I love the vibrant colours of the upbeat musical sequences but also the careful shadowing of the slower pieces, obviously there to let the music carry the scene.
          In my review of Moana I proclaimed “How Far I’ll Go” as the Best Original Song winner this year. I’d like to rescind that statement in light of the bevy of great songs in La La Land. These songs are smooth, well-written, catchy, and more than that, really embody the mood of the characters. They’re really integrated smoothly, and enhance the story and tone. The piano theme of the couple is a really sweet little tune that forms an emotional weight the whole film through. The opening number “Another Day of Sun” wherein people dance on a crowded L.A. overpass, and “A Lovely Night” which particularly feels like something out of a Gene Kelly movie are really good; but “The Fools Who Dream” may be the new Best Song frontrunner for just how much passion Stone puts into it and the touching meaning it has for artists everywhere. However the fun and boisterous “Someone in the Crowd” or the soulful ballad “City of Stars” could score nominations themselves -they’re all pretty fantastic! And again, these songs are executed wonderfully, Stone and Gosling are capable singers throwing themselves into these performances, and they’re shot without cuts in a lovely fashion.
          If Whiplash was a sign young Damian Chazelle was a great talent, La La Land confirms it. This movie is a celebration of jazz music and cinema, but it’s also a down-to-earth drama about following your dreams and the highs and lows that come with that -and somehow while still being a grand musical. Really, La La Land is a celebration of artistry, and a tribute to all those who’ve both succeeded and failed along the road to achieve their creative ambitions; in short, it’s a film for all the foolish dreamers out there.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Strange History of the American Spoof Movie

Parody movies have been around for a lot longer than we tend to think of them. Even from the earliest days of Hollywood there were movies meant to satirize a particular subject or genre. In the silent era, Buster Keaton was responsible for a few. And in the early sound era, almost as soon as the monster pictures took off did you see comic versions of them -Abbott and Costello hosting a few. But parody movies tended to be subtle for most of cinema history, or parody came in conjunction with another goal of the comedy. It really wasn’t until the 1980s and 90s that it took off and became popularly understood. And there is perhaps a line to be drawn to the counterculture comedy explosion that began in the 1970s through avenues like  Saturday Night Live , which frequently parodied from even its earliest years popular movies and cultural properties of the time. But that is still a way’s back. To my generation though, ‘parody movie’ is perhaps a less known term than the more blunt ‘s...
Post a Comment
Read more

A Stylish and Charmingly Reinvented David Copperfield

The Personal History, Adventures, Experience and Observation of David Copperfield the Younger of Blunderstone Rookery (Which He Never Meant to Publish on Any Account)  is the most important book Charles Dickens ever wrote. It is not the most famous or influential by any means (that would of course be A Christmas Carol ), but it is the book that is the purest expression of the authors’ style, identity, and worldview. It is his most personal work, semi-autobiographical in its story of the chronology from infancy to adulthood of a character who overcomes great loss and hardships to find a fulfilling life as a writer. To read David Copperfield  is to understand Dickens himself. Armando Iannucci knew this when he decided to make a new adaptation of the novel for a twenty-first century audience. He also knew that Dickens adaptations are ubiquitous at this point. Films are a bit rarer, but every few years a new television adaptation rears its head to keep the authors’ unique world an...
Post a Comment
Read more

Notes on the Title Cards of The Lord of the Rings

It might be sacrilege for one who both considers The Lord of the Rings  trilogy to be one of the greatest triumphs of cinema and has been an avid lover of the films since adolescence, to declare that the original theatrical cuts of the films are better than the much beloved extended editions. Easily it’s my most controversial opinion regarding these movies. Don’t get me wrong, I do like the extended editions quite a lot, especially as someone who just enjoys spending time in that universe. They flesh it out more, add extra flavour, and in increasing the length by about an hour really emphasize the epic quality of these films. But I find that the original cuts are generally more cleanly paced, more seamlessly edited, and much more accessible to audiences. All the stuff there is to love about The Lord of the Rings  is there in the original versions, the plethora of new and extended scenes merely add to that for fans. And of those, they fall into three camps for me: 1....
1 comment
Read more